Jump to content

S4GRU.com Sections Font Color


chappo2000

Recommended Posts

It's no big deal..... but does anyone else have trouble reading the greyish font color of the S4GRU.com's "unselected" section titles (The Forums, The Member Zone, etc) contrasted with they dark yellow background? I'm referring to the desktop site, of course.

 

Who knows, I may need to spend next year's flex spending on glasses....

 

Edit: Also, the font color of "Started by: (User's name), (Date and Time)" as you're reading a forum post. Something about that color makes it hard for me to read. lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's no big deal..... but does anyone else have trouble reading the greyish font color of the S4GRU.com's section titles (The Forums, The Member Zone, etc) contrasted with they dark yellow background? I'm referring to the desktop site, of course.

 

Who knows, I may need to spend next year's flex spending on glasses....

 

Edit: Also, the font color of "Started by: (User's name), (Date and Time)" as you're reading a forum post. Something about that color makes it hard for me to read. lol

 

My first thought is that it may be the monitor out of color, contrast, or brightness.  The second would be to have your eyes checked. 

Outside of that, I'm not sure what else could be done.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's no big deal..... but does anyone else have trouble reading the greyish font color of the S4GRU.com's "unselected" section titles (The Forums, The Member Zone, etc) contrasted with they dark yellow background? I'm referring to the desktop site, of course.

 

Who knows, I may need to spend next year's flex spending on glasses....

 

How hard it is to change, I do not know, but it is hard for me to see as well.

 

Edit: Also, the font color of "Started by: (User's name), (Date and Time)" as you're reading a forum post. Something about that color makes it hard for me to read. lol

 

Shades of grey... I could see that being difficult to read as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's no big deal..... but does anyone else have trouble reading the greyish font color of the S4GRU.com's "unselected" section titles (The Forums, The Member Zone, etc) contrasted with they dark yellow background? I'm referring to the desktop site, of course.

 

Who knows, I may need to spend next year's flex spending on glasses....

 

Edit: Also, the font color of "Started by: (User's name), (Date and Time)" as you're reading a forum post. Something about that color makes it hard for me to read. lol

I have to agree.  I've coped by highlighting the text to read it when I need to, but different colors would be better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. I've coped by highlighting the text to read it when I need to, but different colors would be better!

Sounds like the same thing I have to do on Tapatalk when people post in black or blue colors. Hard to read on that black background.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this was brought up quite a while back but nothing ever came out of it. I do agree that its hard to read.

The section headings had been black before the IP.Board overhaul. I pointed out the visibility issue, but I do not believe that Robert was able to fix it.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was not able to fix it. I will need to use IP Board's Premium services to get them to change it. We have access to the code, but when I look at it, I get scared to touch it. It's not HTML. It's CSS, and it's like 50 files that are all stacked and embedded into each other. It is way above my skill set.

 

This has been on my to do list for a long time. But it does not take priority over content. Also on that to do list is to move The Wall to the first tab, as it used to be in the beginning of S4GRU. Also to expand The Wall to be the first 10 articles, not the first two.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps we need to reach out to see if there is a member who has the CSS background to edit the code.

And it could not just be any member. It would have to be a very well known and trusted member.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And it could not just be any member. It would have to be a very well known and trusted member.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

A really well known member is PeterNorth, but also RonJeremy. :lol:  :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is CSS ... cobol standard source? Ok ok I know my age is showing. :(

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

Cascading style sheets. They help add visual design to HTML code.

 

https://www.google.com/url?q=http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets&sa=U&ei=kyq-Uum4BdjioATq1IGwBQ&ved=0CBIQFjAB&usg=AFQjCNEeZb2W3W6trJYu9Fmaulb07tULnA

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I probably could do it. It'll just take a few days.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Perfect timing, Josh!  Because, when I'm viewing the site on New Years Eve, my vision may be a little worse than it is now. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect timing, Josh! Because, when I'm viewing the site on New Years Eve, my vision may be a little worse than it is now.

You'll be on here on New Years Eve? I'd rather be partying! Haha! :rofl:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll be on here on New Years Eve? I'd rather be partying! Haha! :rofl:

 

Oh, Josh, we know you like to party.  See the video interview...

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah the good old days of Web design. I'd always be the last to finish but have the best looking and working site in class. I even built mine for Firefox and chrome while everyone else just went with the bare minimum of IE. Good times.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...