Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

  • The WSJ reports Sprint (S +5%) could make a bid for T-Mobile USA (TMUS +7.8%) in 1H14. Both Sprint and T-Mobile shares have spiked in response.
  • The FCC would doubtlessly give close scrutiny to a deal that would reduce the number of nationwide U.S. carriers to three from four. But Sprint majority owner SoftBank (SFTBF) hasn't been scared to make big bets.

http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1464871?source=email_rt_mc_readmore

 

 

 

I knew Son had deep pockets, but DAMN! He is on a take over mission.

Posted

http://vrge.co/1cGVOf4

 

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303293604579256561000513396

 

Sprint Corp. is working toward a possible bid for rival T-Mobile US Inc., people familiar with the matter said, setting the stage for a giant telecom merger that if permitted by regulators would leave the U.S. wireless market dominated by three big companies.

 

Sprint is studying regulatory concerns and could launch a bid in the first half of next year, the people said. A deal could be worth more than $20 billion, depending on the size...

And here...we...go...

 

 

  • Like 7
Posted

My first thought. Awesome! Now, let me really think about it....

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Right there with you. I would wonder what Son would want to do if he has his money split on CDMA and GSM. Would that mean that Sprint Network roll out would slow? 

Posted

I highly doubt that this will fly by the DoJ and FCC. It seems pretty clear that four national carriers is the goal, and the benefits of a merger of Sprint and T-Mobile would certainly not outweigh the costs of losing that competition.

 

There isn't much synergy between the two at all. There is literally no band+technology overlap, and their combined spectrum resources would be absurd and extremely tilted towards high frequencies. The only possible case here would be that having a carrier with 80 million customers instead of two with around half each would give more pressure on the big two.

 

I suspect, however, that this would occur more through S+TM price increases rather than ATT/VZ price decreases.

Posted

Just came to post the same thing.  This is interesting, but does it make sense with different wireless technologies?!  That's always been my criticism. 

  • Like 1
Posted

This might actually be a possibilty after all. Masayoshi is going to swallow up the competition at all costs. He had his eye on T-Mobile and it seems he is illing to go after them, after all.

Posted

Wow. I can't imagine- If this actually makes it through regulators Sprint will surely be top dog within a year. 

I don't think the GSM to CDMA difference is much of an important factor looking forward. TMO purchased Metro PCS, a CDMA carrier. Plus LTE technologies are pretty similar among carriers with the exception of spectrum its deployed on and TD / FD LTE.

 

At least that's my take.

Posted

O_O this is big. I sort of knew this would happen at some point. But as mmark27 said, the different technologies might be a bit of a problem. Perhaps they can run both networks separately like T-Mo did with Metro PCS? I'd like to avoid another Nextel fiasco again.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

If they really plan to move on tmo, I would not be surprised to see future sprint phones setup just like nexus5.

Posted

This might actually be a possibilty after all. Masayoshi is going to swallow up the competition at all costs. He had his eye on T-Mobile and it seems he is willing to go after them, after all.

 

Maybe they'll run as separate brands still and when the time comes for VoLTE, they'll merge under one brand. Or maybe they'll offer a series of Nexus 5-like devices that have both CDMA and GSM radios and you choose which network you would like to on. However, having all LTE bands to use would be awesome.

Posted

As long as the Network Vision infrastructure is maintained, I don't think CDMA will go away for current Sprint customers anytime soon. This isn't as far fetched as it seems... Network Vision infrastructure will be able to support legacy T-Mobile tech as well, IIRC. I think the technical aspect isn't the hardest part of this. 

 

The competitive aspect per the FCC? You better believe that will be examined.

  • Like 1
Posted

I hope this doesn't go through. The US wireless market would be very uncompetitive I think at three major carriers. Most European countries have four and much smaller populations (although much smaller geographic areas so returns to scale aren't as high).

  • Like 5
Posted

As long as the Network Vision infrastructure is maintained, I don't think CDMA will go away for current Sprint customers anytime soon. This isn't as far fetched as it seems... Network Vision infrastructure will be able to support legacy T-Mobile tech as well, IIRC. I think the technical aspect isn't the hardest part of this. 

 

The competitive aspect per the FCC? You better believe that will be examined.

 

Yup, I remember reading that the network vision infrastructure would make a merger like this possible.  The network differences are really not the big problem here.  And I guess this is coming up now as the NV upgrades would be close to complete by the time something like this would close.  Sprint has wanted to do this for a while, but my guess is they had to get to a certain point in the NV upgrade to try and pull it off. 

Posted

I highly doubt that this will fly by the DoJ and FCC. It seems pretty clear that four national carriers is the goal, and the benefits of a merger of Sprint and T-Mobile would certainly not outweigh the costs of losing that competition. There isn't much synergy between the two at all. There is literally no band+technology overlap, and their combined spectrum resources would be absurd and extremely tilted towards high frequencies. The only possible case here would be that having a carrier with 80 million customers instead of two with around half each would give more pressure on the big two. I suspect, however, that this would occur more through S+TM price increases rather than ATT/VZ price decreases.

 

 

I agree. He might want to run them as two separate companies. But then that would be counterproductive...

Posted

As a recent T-Mobile converter, please, no. God no. Im finally able to actually use my connection. I think Sprint should give it a couple years to get the network vision plan fleshed out before making any power moves

Posted

As a recent T-Mobile converter, please, no. God no. Im finally able to actually use my connection. I think Sprint should give it a couple years to get the network vision plan fleshed out before making any power moves

 

I don't see how this is relevant. Your network experience doesn't instantly change if they merge.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't see how this is relevant. Your network experience doesn't instantly change if they merge.

You are indeed correct. Likely nothing will change in the short term. But I believe tmobile's pricing to be better than Sprint's for now. And pricing would likely be the first thing to change in a merger I believe.

Once network vision is done, Sprint will blow them out the water on data coverage though

Posted

I'd much rather Sprint take the $20 billion they could potentially spend on a merger and just put T-Mobile out of business by accelerating the NV plan. Get me all three glorious bands of LTE (Spark? Still feels odd saying that) and blanket the country.

 

People will see a difference between VZW and AT&T. And they won't be switching to T-Mobile for the off-chance they travel out of the country and can roam on a paltry amount of free 3G/LTE.

 

Also, maybe get some better commercials.

  • Like 9
Posted

Sprint needs to focus on finishing Network Vision first. Then after the network vision is complete they can go out the T Mobile. Until then they shouldn't do anything

Posted

I have no words for the thought process or how possible this will be going forward but just reading into it they're going to see what the powers that be have to say before they even the side of the going to move forward or not!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It seems like that is the smallest Google Play System change that google releases. I see 12 MB updates really regularly. 
    • Went back to Greenville last week and what an insane change 4 years has made! Every site in the city has n25/41/71 now and T-Mobile has even added new sites in the city since the last time I was there. As a result, their coverage and speeds are great everywhere. Unfortunately I don't have my Verizon line anymore so I'm unable to compare their performance to T-Mobile but they definitely had better coverage and speeds than AT&Tin my testing.  On the LTE side of things, T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 71, 10MHz Band 66, and 5MHz Band 2 deployed. On the 5G side, they have 190MHz n41, 15MHz n25, and 15MHz n71 deployed. As you'd expect 5G is several times faster than LTE here because of that. One thing I noticed though is that T-Mobile's speeds pretty much never go above 1Gbps here. I'm not sure if it's a backhaul limitation or if they're seriously pushing their 5G home internet product here but on most sites I was seeing 500-600Mbps with some sites having peaks in the high 800s-low 900's. I also noticed that upload speeds weren't nearly as good as they were in NYC. I attribute this to the fact that site spacing often cause the phone to drop to n25 or n71 for uploads as opposed to using n41. I have a handful of high (>100Mbps) upload speed tests but that was with me virtually right next to a site. Since I drove my own car instead of riding with family, I used the opportunity to map a ton of rural roads outside to Greenville to see what kind of coverage I'd get. T-Mobile has stepped up their game a ton in this regard as I found that coverage matched and in many cases surpassed what I was seeing on AT&T. areas where AT&T dropped to 1 bar or even no signal, I held onto weak n71 and was still able to place calls using VoNR. There are still areas where I would drop signal but those were areas where I'm certain the only carrier available was U.S. Cellular since they still have a ton of macros that they're the only tenant on. The U.S. Cellular merger won't add much to T-Mobile's spectrum coffers there; they'll increase 600MHz from 20MHz to 30MHz, gain another 10MHz of AWS, and acquire the rest of the 24GHz band, but they'll gain a ton new sites to bolster their rural coverage in this area and make it pretty much the best in the region.  — — — — — I also mapped Dish while down there. Dish's doesn't have much spectrum in Pitt County, they only have 5MHz n71, 25MHz n70 and 5MHz n29. This lack of spectrum combined with what is pretty much a skeleton/license protection network meant that in most cases I was only on 1-2 bars of n71 indoors and while outdoors I wasn't seeing speeds nearly as good as I get in NYC. While directly in front of a site I could get over 300Mbps but in most cases while out and about I wasn't seeing over 100Mbps. In fact, at my hotel I was only able to get about 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on n71. Maybe as they densify I'll see more consistently high speeds but their lack of spectrum will remain a huge bottleneck much like it was for T-Mobile pre-Sprint merger. — — — — — AT&T and Verizon are the only carriers with small cells in Greenville. Verizon has a significantly larger deployment than AT&T though, with AT&T having it along some roads where they have weaker coverage while Verizon seems to be using them for added capacity Uptown and especially around ECU. They started being installed around 2019 but none of them have 5G as far as I can tell, only LTE. AT&T also has C-band and DoD deployed on every site in the city, giving me speeds in the range of 350-400Mbps in most areas. — — — — — Here are some photos of small cells in Greenville.  
    • Just checked and found a 12MB Google Play System update ready to download.    Still October 1 for the date after however. 
    • Looks like my little area finally has some decent mobile connectivity. Still have a few dead spots on both tmo and firstnet... https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10549791800  
    • A permit was submitted for a new T-Mobile site at 42-83 Hunter St in Long Island City. There used to be a T-Mobile site in this area but it got decommissioned a couple of years ago because the building it was on got demolished. The location of this new site is significantly better than the previous site's location though, situated more centrally in the densest part of LIC on the roof of a building that's less than 10 years old so they won't have to worry about demolition anytime soon. — — — — — Sprint eNB 5791 -> T-Mobile gNB 1371770 This site took well over a month to go live and has n25 and n41 sharing the same gNB which is new to me. Usually n25 shares a gNB ID with n71.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...