Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What if this is really SoftBank pushing this? That has easily got lost in this discussion.

  • Like 5
Posted

What if this is really SoftBank pushing this? That has easily got lost in this discussion.

 

I think they are playing a big role in this.  They have stated in the past to compete with the big 2 they need a bigger footprint.  This certantly would help. 

Posted

What if this is really SoftBank pushing this? That has easily got lost in this discussion.

 

I mentioned Masayoshi. I definitely feel like this is his doing and that he is pushing for this. He wants to either squash or merge them, and its easier to combine companies than to fight them while upgrading the network.

Posted

Why and how would this benefit us? Combined Sprint and Tmobile coverage compatible with our existing service? I am confused. Someone elaborate for me please.

Posted

Why and how would this benefit us? Combined Sprint and Tmobile coverage compatible with our existing service? I am confused. Someone elaborate for me please.

I saw thus coming but I figured maybe in 5 years

Posted

I'd much rather Sprint take the $20 billion they could potentially spend on a merger and just put T-Mobile out of business by accelerating the NV plan. Get me all three glorious bands of LTE (Spark? Still feels odd saying that) and blanket the country.

 

People will see a difference between VZW and AT&T. And they won't be switching to T-Mobile for the off-chance they travel out of the country and can roam on a paltry amount of free 3G/LTE.

 

Also, maybe get some better commercials.

 

 

I think they are playing a big role in this.  They have stated in the past to compete with the big 2 they need a bigger footprint.  This certantly would help. 

 

I don't think merging with T-mobile really "increases their footprint", just doubles up on the footprint that already exists?!  They need to expand to rural markets and just put a tower on every 4th power line throughout the country with that $20 billionz.

Posted (edited)

Yeah, I could have told them that about a year ago! Masa has had his eyes on T-Mobile from the beginning!

Edited by bigsnake49
Posted

I think a merger between the 2 is almost inevitable.  That is the only way either of them will be able to truly compete with VZW and AT&T.  I think the combination of technologies and frequencies will be a hurdle though.  I think the best possibliity for them to get the merger approved will be if they disband all of the prepaid brands into its own company.... kinda like when the government broke up Ma Bell back in the day.

Posted

I very excited about a possible merger. Tmobile has a ton of useful spectrum while sprint has a bunch of high frequency spectrum

Posted

I mentioned Masayoshi. I definitely feel like this is his doing and that he is pushing for this. He wants to either squash or merge them, and its easier to combine companies than to fight them while upgrading the network.

 

It is his doing, although Sprint had looked at it and were in pretty deep negotiations before AT&T made their ill fated attempt to absorb T-Mobile.

Posted

I just hope the sprint leadership goes away and is replaced by T-Mobile's. Tmobile has better advertising, stores, customer support, better plan to attract customers, speed in major cities, etc. This latest problem with sprint sims has me peeved that they want to lose customers by not providing sims.

Posted

What if this is really SoftBank pushing this? That has easily got lost in this discussion.

 

Considering they own 80% of Sprint and are on the board, this is definitely at the urge of Softbank. I'm not for it at all. More lost competition.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yeah I'm assuming this is Softbank's doings (through Sprint).  It would be interesting to see if regulators would let this happen.

Posted

What if this is really SoftBank pushing this? That has easily got lost in this discussion.

It most definitely is.

 

I am definitely not surprised by this news, I think I may have even mention this before but in either case though, I just don't see it happening.

Posted

Sprint has some serious add and needs to learn how to successfully complete one task before loving onto the next. I hope this does not go through as I was planning to switch to tmo once my contract comes up. We all know how the Nextel merger went. This will be no different especially given the recent track record of successfully competing projects on time. Regulators please squash this.

  • Like 2
Posted

I very excited about a possible merger. Tmobile has a ton of useful spectrum while sprint has a bunch of high frequency spectrum

 

And neither have great coverage.

 

They'd be better off building coverage instead of buying customers.

  • Like 1
Posted

Can't we just get 800, 1900, and 2500 running and call it a day. That would be enough to make people leave att and verizon for us. Why merge with tmobile. Eh.

  • Like 1
Posted

I can't say I see this happening.

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

Sprint has some serious add and needs to learn how to successfully complete one task before loving onto the next. I hope this does not go through as I was planning to switch to tmo once my contract comes up. We all know how the Nextel merger went. This will be no different especially given the recent track record of successfully competing projects on time. Regulators please squash this.

 

Nextel could have only suceesfully merged with either AT&T or Verizon. They were the only ones that had the footprint to match Nextel's.

Guest Rxpert83
Posted

There's no way it'll pass the regulatory folks

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 3
Posted

People, this doesn't necessarily mean less competition. But I do think that Sprint would be better off with USCC than with T-Mobile.

  • Like 7
Posted

There's no way it'll pass the regulatory folks

 

I would not be so certain.  There is a world of difference between AT&T-T-Mobile and Sprint-T-Mobile.  One creates an anti competitive behemoth; the other just helps level the playing field.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Vinegar Hill is getting the Brooklyn Heights treatment now with regard to small cells. I mapped two more small cells in the neighborhood in the past few days so now T-Mobile is up to 8 of them in such a tiny neighborhood. While it's cool they're doing this since it means outdoors you get a consistent 400Mbps+ almost everywhere, it sucks because they're obviously deploying so many of them to make up for their lack of a macro site in the entire neighborhood. Because there isn't a macro, the small cells have a greater coverage area than you see in other neighborhoods and you often connect to them while indoors but coverage and speeds fall off indoors much faster on small cells than on macros in my experience.  Even Dish has better coverage than T-Mobile in Vinegar Hill since they added the site on top of the Extra Space Storage building alongside AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile needs to get in line with their competitors there.
    • It seems like that is the smallest Google Play System change that google releases. I see 12 MB updates really regularly. 
    • Went back to Greenville last week and what an insane change 4 years has made! Every site in the city has n25/41/71 now and T-Mobile has even added new sites in the city since the last time I was there. As a result, their coverage and speeds are great everywhere. Unfortunately I don't have my Verizon line anymore so I'm unable to compare their performance to T-Mobile but they definitely had better coverage and speeds than AT&Tin my testing.  On the LTE side of things, T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 71, 10MHz Band 66, and 5MHz Band 2 deployed. On the 5G side, they have 190MHz n41, 15MHz n25, and 15MHz n71 deployed. As you'd expect 5G is several times faster than LTE here because of that. One thing I noticed though is that T-Mobile's speeds pretty much never go above 1Gbps here. I'm not sure if it's a backhaul limitation or if they're seriously pushing their 5G home internet product here but on most sites I was seeing 500-600Mbps with some sites having peaks in the high 800s-low 900's. I also noticed that upload speeds weren't nearly as good as they were in NYC. I attribute this to the fact that site spacing often cause the phone to drop to n25 or n71 for uploads as opposed to using n41. I have a handful of high (>100Mbps) upload speed tests but that was with me virtually right next to a site. Since I drove my own car instead of riding with family, I used the opportunity to map a ton of rural roads outside to Greenville to see what kind of coverage I'd get. T-Mobile has stepped up their game a ton in this regard as I found that coverage matched and in many cases surpassed what I was seeing on AT&T. areas where AT&T dropped to 1 bar or even no signal, I held onto weak n71 and was still able to place calls using VoNR. There are still areas where I would drop signal but those were areas where I'm certain the only carrier available was U.S. Cellular since they still have a ton of macros that they're the only tenant on. The U.S. Cellular merger won't add much to T-Mobile's spectrum coffers there; they'll increase 600MHz from 20MHz to 30MHz, gain another 10MHz of AWS, and acquire the rest of the 24GHz band, but they'll gain a ton new sites to bolster their rural coverage in this area and make it pretty much the best in the region.  — — — — — I also mapped Dish while down there. Dish's doesn't have much spectrum in Pitt County, they only have 5MHz n71, 25MHz n70 and 5MHz n29. This lack of spectrum combined with what is pretty much a skeleton/license protection network meant that in most cases I was only on 1-2 bars of n71 indoors and while outdoors I wasn't seeing speeds nearly as good as I get in NYC. While directly in front of a site I could get over 300Mbps but in most cases while out and about I wasn't seeing over 100Mbps. In fact, at my hotel I was only able to get about 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on n71. Maybe as they densify I'll see more consistently high speeds but their lack of spectrum will remain a huge bottleneck much like it was for T-Mobile pre-Sprint merger. — — — — — AT&T and Verizon are the only carriers with small cells in Greenville. Verizon has a significantly larger deployment than AT&T though, with AT&T having it along some roads where they have weaker coverage while Verizon seems to be using them for added capacity Uptown and especially around ECU. They started being installed around 2019 but none of them have 5G as far as I can tell, only LTE. AT&T also has C-band and DoD deployed on every site in the city, giving me speeds in the range of 350-400Mbps in most areas. — — — — — Here are some photos of small cells in Greenville.  
    • Just checked and found a 12MB Google Play System update ready to download.    Still October 1 for the date after however. 
    • Looks like my little area finally has some decent mobile connectivity. Still have a few dead spots on both tmo and firstnet... https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10549791800  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...