Jump to content

Has anyone noticed this trend with LTE ?


Recommended Posts

I've now driven by at least 5 Sprint stores and each time I'm in that vicinity I get LTE. I noticed at some locations, I'll lose LTE one or two blocks away from the store but when I'm in front of it I definitely get a signal.

 

I'd be curious to know if anyone else noticed this trend. It'd certainly make sense since Sprint reps could tell prospective customers about LTE and show them in store how fast it can be.

 

Is there any chance they are using a signal booster (like the kind they sell on Amazon) for LTE? And is it even possible to buy a signal repeater/booster for LTE because I would love to purchase one since I lose LTE once I get in my garage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've now driven by at least 5 Sprint stores and each time I'm in that vicinity I get LTE. I noticed at some locations, I'll lose LTE one or two blocks away from the store but when I'm in front of it I definitely get a signal.

 

I'd be curious to know if anyone else noticed this trend. It'd certainly make sense since Sprint reps could tell prospective customers about LTE and show them in store how fast it can be.

 

Is there any chance they are using a signal booster (like the kind they sell on Amazon) for LTE? And is it even possible to buy a signal repeater/booster for LTE because I would love to purchase one since I lose LTE once I get in my garage.

It's possible they're using a small cells, but I avoid going to the store whenever possible.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've now driven by at least 5 Sprint stores and each time I'm in that vicinity I get LTE. I noticed at some locations, I'll lose LTE one or two blocks away from the store but when I'm in front of it I definitely get a signal.

 

I'd be curious to know if anyone else noticed this trend. It'd certainly make sense since Sprint reps could tell prospective customers about LTE and show them in store how fast it can be.

 

Is there any chance they are using a signal booster (like the kind they sell on Amazon) for LTE? And is it even possible to buy a signal repeater/booster for LTE because I would love to purchase one since I lose LTE once I get in my garage.

I was told they are using some form of a repeater at stores that have low signal. My sprint store in Tyler has low signal LTE and they were in the process of getting a Repeater so they can get LTE usable inside
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be true for company owned retail (also known as "corporate stores"), but it definitely is not true for most preferred retailers in the West Michigan Market.

 

That being said, installing repeaters in stores where in-building coverage is an issue is definitely something that happens. One got installed in a store that's less than 500 feet from a site and has no coverage issues, so take that as you will.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've now driven by at least 5 Sprint stores and each time I'm in that vicinity I get LTE. I noticed at some locations, I'll lose LTE one or two blocks away from the store but when I'm in front of it I definitely get a signal.

 

I'd be curious to know if anyone else noticed this trend. It'd certainly make sense since Sprint reps could tell prospective customers about LTE and show them in store how fast it can be.

 

 

 

hehe, No.  Every single one of our stores that I've been to has the worst service I've seen.  It's embarasing really and Network vision can't move fast enough for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the none corporate stores I have been to have LTE towers close by and you can do a speed test which I have done and have gotten great results. The corporate owned stores however are in cities that have yet to get LTE and they use WIFI to demendtrate features on the phones.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My local corporate store is right at the edge of LTE. Once the two towers thay are closedt to it are upgraded it won't be an issue but for now while in store you hsve 3G or 4G depending on which side of the store you are in.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time I was in my local Sprint corporate store, they didn't have LTE and the WiFi supplied by Sprint was so bad that they were walking outside to activate phones on the free wifi from Starbucks down the block.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they are using some sort of repeater, is this something that's available for purchase by the public?

 

In Southern CA where I'm at, I'm certain I'm not imagining it. In fact I went out to dinner with a friend last night and actually went to a restaurant in neighboring city that has a sprint store in the same plaza. Lo and behold LTE in the restaurant. 

 

It was only 3 mbps down but still, that's better than .3 down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time I was in my local Sprint corporate store, they didn't have LTE and the WiFi supplied by Sprint was so bad that they were walking outside to activate phones on the free wifi from Starbucks down the block.

I would totally hate working at that store. "Here's your new service! Oh yeah, hang on gotta borrow our neighbors wifi to get you onto our network."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they are using some sort of repeater, is this something that's available for purchase by the public?

 

 

No.

 

 

In Southern CA where I'm at, I'm certain I'm not imagining it. In fact I went out to dinner with a friend last night and actually went to a restaurant in neighboring city that has a sprint store in the same plaza. Lo and behold LTE in the restaurant.

It was only 3 mbps down but still, that's better than .3 down.

 

Sprint is not specifically upgrading sites near Sprint stores. The Sprint store that I visit in KC happened to be next to one of the later sites upgraded, so even when the market launched, there was no LTE at the store.

 

Neither of the stores here in Springfield have LTE yet. But the rural hwy 60 does all along it into the middle of the Ozarks, which is basically the middle of no where. 

 

There is no order to which sites are being upgraded. When ever the work permit, equipment, crews and backhaul are all in place, the upgrades are done. That's the only order to the upgrades. Perhaps, the sites near the Sprint stores were easier to upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time I was in my local Sprint corporate store, they didn't have LTE and the WiFi supplied by Sprint was so bad that they were walking outside to activate phones on the free wifi from Starbucks down the block.

 

Sprint's in store WiFi isn't meant to be high-speed access. It is limited to 500kb usually, and it is meant to be like that. There are three separate WiFi access points in the store. Two are cradlepoint hotspots running off aircards meant to be used to activate iPhones. For some reason WiFi activation through the aircard is faster than 3G activation regularly (tested by me, and it is true, 2-3x faster actually even though it's the same connection really). The third is a WiFi access point mounted in the ceiling that shares it's connection with the store's backhaul connection, many stores are still running off a T1 line and have not been upgraded to broadband, hence the slow speeds.

 

In addition, all of these are limited to between 5 and 10 concurrent users. So if a rep forgets to have a device "forget" the WiFi network, it can artificially clog the WiFi preventing it from being used properly by everyone else, thus necessitating a requirement for a different WiFi point. Also the cradlepoint routers were to be setup by the store itself, not a separate team sent out like the SSWIFI, as such who knows if the employee that set it up followed the instructions properly, or whether the employees there are using it properly. I say this from experience working in commission-based retail sales for 7 years, if it doesn't directly make them money, sales reps usually don't pay much attention.

 

None of these WiFi access points are meant to be public WiFi. They each have a specific purpose for the reps to utilize them for. It is against Sprint policy to provide the WiFi access information as they are only to be used for their intended purpose.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would totally hate working at that store. "Here's your new service! Oh yeah, hang on gotta borrow our neighbors wifi to get you onto our network."

Reminds me of the store in the mall a while back. The guy would go out the back door to make sure the phone worked since only roaming worked in the store. I saw one sale get reversed due to that.

 

Last time I was at our Corp store there wasn't any LTE there. I know their site kinda nearby was decommissioned. There's really no others close by and I haven't seen Sprint adding anything there in the area either. You can get some fringe LTE outside if you are holding the phone right. It's one of the many dead zones in town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any chance they are using a signal booster (like the kind they sell on Amazon) for LTE? And is it even possible to buy a signal repeater/booster for LTE because I would love to purchase one since I lose LTE once I get in my garage.

Once you get in your garage don't you switch from the weak LTE signal onto your strong and super fast and uncongested WIFI signal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of the store in the mall a while back. The guy would go out the back door to make sure the phone worked since only roaming worked in the store. I saw one sale get reversed due to that.

 

Last time I was at our Corp store there wasn't any LTE there. I know their site kinda nearby was decommissioned. There's really no others close by and I haven't seen Sprint adding anything there in the area either. You can get some fringe LTE outside if you are holding the phone right. It's one of the many dead zones in town.

It'd deter me from activating service with Sprint if they didn't even have service at the store.  I think first impressions mean a lot and when I was giving T-Mobile a go awhile back on their $30 plan, I had very strong signal in the store and when I left, I hit like 28mbps down on HSPA+ 42.  I was very happy and excited but as time went on I found a lot of dead zones where I have Sprint signal and I couldn't even send texts on T-Mobile in those areas.  Sprint may not be the fastest but I'd like to have as much voice/texting coverage as possible.  Not to mention my cousins in Starke, FL will have 4G LTE from Sprint while no one else will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'd deter me from activating service with Sprint if they didn't even have service at the store.  I think first impressions mean a lot and when I was giving T-Mobile a go awhile back on their $30 plan, I had very strong signal in the store and when I left, I hit like 28mbps down on HSPA+ 42.  I was very happy and excited but as time went on I found a lot of dead zones where I have Sprint signal and I couldn't even send texts on T-Mobile in those areas.  Sprint may not be the fastest but I'd like to have as much voice/texting coverage as possible.  Not to mention my cousins in Starke, FL will have 4G LTE from Sprint while no one else will.

You mean to tell me that people actually live in Starke, FL?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's in store WiFi isn't meant to be high-speed access. It is limited to 500kb usually, and it is meant to be like that. There are three separate WiFi access points in the store. Two are cradlepoint hotspots running off aircards meant to be used to activate iPhones. For some reason WiFi activation through the aircard is faster than 3G activation regularly (tested by me, and it is true, 2-3x faster actually even though it's the same connection really). The third is a WiFi access point mounted in the ceiling that shares it's connection with the store's backhaul connection, many stores are still running off a T1 line and have not been upgraded to broadband, hence the slow speeds.

 

In addition, all of these are limited to between 5 and 10 concurrent users. So if a rep forgets to have a device "forget" the WiFi network, it can artificially clog the WiFi preventing it from being used properly by everyone else, thus necessitating a requirement for a different WiFi point. Also the cradlepoint routers were to be setup by the store itself, not a separate team sent out like the SSWIFI, as such who knows if the employee that set it up followed the instructions properly, or whether the employees there are using it properly. I say this from experience working in commission-based retail sales for 7 years, if it doesn't directly make them money, sales reps usually don't pay much attention.

 

None of these WiFi access points are meant to be public WiFi. They each have a specific purpose for the reps to utilize them for. It is against Sprint policy to provide the WiFi access information as they are only to be used for their intended purpose.

The store I work at is ran off T1 back haul and we have two cradle points but sprint is starting to upgrade stores. Last month we got 4 dsl lines to use for in store activations and we are suppose to be getting some higher speed backhaul to replace our T1. I wish they would just use lte since our area is almost completely 1900 lte/800 1x completed.

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do switch to wifi. Im also a time warner cable user and my home is a townhouse that is connected to two other units. I'm not sure if that has anything to do with it, but at times speeds just completely crawl. I don't know if the 3 of us are all sharing from a line or what but I have to reset my modem multiple times on certain days.

 

on those days itd be nice to have LTE indoors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • On Reddit, someone asked (skeptically) if the US Cellular buyout would result in better service.  I'd been pondering this very issue, and decided to cross-post my response here: I've been pondering the question in the title and I've come to the conclusion that the answer is that it's possible. Hear me out. Unlike some of the small carriers that work exclusively with one larger carrier, all three major carriers roam on US Cellular today in at least some areas, so far as I know. If that network ceases to exist, then the carriers would presumably want to recover those areas of lost service by building out natively. Thus, people in those areas who may only have service from US Cellular or from US Cellular and one other may gain competition from other carriers backfilling that loss. How likely is it? I'm not sure. But it's definitely feasible. Most notably, AT&T did their big roaming deal with US Cellular in support of FirstNet in places where they lacked native coverage. They can't just lose a huge chunk of coverage whole still making FirstNet happy; I suspect they'll have to build out and recover at least some of that area, if not most of it. So it'd be indirect, but I could imagine it. - Trip
    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...