Jump to content

Microsoft to acquire Nokia device biz, take Windows Phone 8 primarily in house


WiWavelength

Recommended Posts

There you go, folks.  Largely the end of an era, Nokia appears to be exiting the handset business.

 

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/microsoft-to-acquire-nokias-devices-services-business-license-nokias-patents-and-mapping-services-2013-09-02?reflink=MW_news_stmp

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully microsoft is careful with integrating the nokia talent and patient with their device endeavors. Too many products launched and fled too soon by microsoft.

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There you go, folks.  Largely the end of an era, Nokia appears to be exiting the handset business.

 

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/microsoft-to-acquire-nokias-devices-services-business-license-nokias-patents-and-mapping-services-2013-09-02?reflink=MW_news_stmp

 

AJ

I just knew this was eventually going to happen after Nokia shot themselves in the foot when they went all in on windows phone. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if M$ was worried about Nokia adding Android to it's phones due to disappointing Windows Phone sales.

I am sure that once an agreement was made with microsoft back in february of 2011 that android was no longer an option.  I am not really sure how long the agreement was for though but I think we all can agree(then and now) that Nokia made a mistake partnering with microsoft.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure that once an agreement was made with microsoft back in february of 2011 that android was no longer an option.  I am not really sure how long the agreement was for though but I think we all can agree(then and now) that Nokia made a mistake partnering with microsoft.

A Nokia Android would have been good for the company, IMO.

 

 

-Luis

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully this will mean better integration, RIM is on the way out and MS can use the opening to get their foothold on the enterprise enviromente RIM is leaving behind, even if it is at a loss. Remember that MS is a very large corporation with many different businesses, some more lucrative than others, mobile sounds like a great way to give them other business. Banks give you toasters, MS will give you cheap phones that are secure and are turnkey solutions. Who know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Nokia Android would have been good for the company, IMO.

 

 

-Luis

Hell yeah it would have, I don't know about anyone else but I always wanted to see an android device by nokia.  As huge as nokia has been in the mobile industry in combination with the diversity of android, I wouldn't have been surprised if nokia turned into a close number # 2 right behind samsung.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully this will mean better integration, RIM is on the way out and MS can use the opening to get their foothold on the enterprise enviromente RIM is leaving behind, even if it is at a loss. Remember that MS is a very large corporation with many different businesses, some more lucrative than others, mobile sounds like a great way to give them other business. Banks give you toasters, MS will give you cheap phones that are secure and are turnkey solutions. Who know...

 

I think that RIM will probably be broken up into the BES group and the phone group. The BES group will then be absorbed by either Android or Apple. The phone group, who knows? How good is their patent portfolio?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The US isn't WInPhone's own market.

 

The Lumia 520/521 has actually done quite well for Nokia/MS in other markets, where people are more price-conscious (the phone is $100-$150 unsubsidized). In Mexico, WinPhone is actually above iOS and RIM in sales (behind Android of course).

 

Would I have liked to see a Lumia running Android? Sure. But Nokia's phones are high-end enough that people will put up with WinPhone due to hardware quality...and then find out that WinPhone isn't all that bad (it isn't my first choice, but really it isn't all that bad).

 

Let's face it: non-Nokia WinPhone devices haven't been anything to write home about. But the Lumias are very solid, and you've got the 520 on one end and the 1020 at the other...and that's what's keeping WinPhone from being an absolute footnote in history at this point.

 

As a web dev, I'm not a huge fan of having more devices running with IE to deal with. But the WinPhone 8 IE version is actually pretty good at rendering pages (as opposed to the atrocity that shipped with WinPhone 7), and I'll take it over older iOS browsers or Android 2.3, which is what you're getting at the Lumia 520 price point elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure that once an agreement was made with microsoft back in february of 2011 that android was no longer an option.  I am not really sure how long the agreement was for though but I think we all can agree(then and now) that Nokia made a mistake partnering with microsoft.

 

I'd wager that partnering with MS was the least worst idea. Nokia got special privileges and some cash for going all in WP. The options were S60, Meego, Android, or WP. I just don't see Nokia unseating Samsung, they would have to take HTC out the picture and then steal some marketshare from everyone else to be viable on Android.

 

The N900 was released in 09, if Nokia would have went all in Meego then I think that would have been their best option..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd wager that partnering with MS was the least worst idea. Nokia got special privileges and some cash for going all in WP. The options were S60, Meego, Android, or WP. I just don't see Nokia unseating Samsung, they would have to take HTC out the picture and then steal some marketshare from everyone else to be viable on Android.

 

The N900 was released in 09, if Nokia would have went all in Meego then I think that would have been their best option..

I can understand going with wp being that they got a quick infuse of cash from MS but even back in 2009 nokia would have stood a better chance jumping on the android bandwagon than going all in on meego. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand going with wp being that they got a quick infuse of cash from MS but even back in 2009 nokia would have stood a better chance jumping on the android bandwagon than going all in on meego. 

 

 

In 2009 yea I think so back then Android and iOS were terrible compared to what they are now.. Especially since the major players got lost with the custom skins. I would imagine Nokia would have kept things simpler. But in 2011 I think the Android window was closed and WP was their last option. 

 

I seriously wonder what they were thinking by not going Meego, Android, or WP. Did they think the market was going to just reverse and people would trade their iPhones in for S60 devices. I can't imagine how they wasted so many years..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is something to think about. We know Nokia is now part of Microsoft, I just read on WMPowersuser the possibility of Microsoft buying Blackberry. What do you people think?

I wouldn't be surprised if that happens, honestly I am shocked that they haven't already sold out to someone else.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Smart move. Corner the enterprise market and build a strong ecosystem. I always thought BB should go WP. They could own the enterprise market and be a strong third option in the consumer market. They could probably even over take apple in a few years, if they ecosystem is strong enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if that happens, honestly I am shocked that they haven't already sold out to someone else.  

It would help Microsoft, if they bought BB, but I don't see them making any big purchase so quickly.  BB, along with Nokia, would bring more talent and patents, but utlimately what Microsoft needs is strong leadership and someone with a vision who knows how to execute and sell a product. 

Edited by Makkari
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I think this will be the end of AT&T carrier exclusivity of Lumia phones. Nokia needed the short term cash that AT&T gave for exclusive phones, but Microsoft's goals are more towards increased market share. I don't know that I would buy a Lumia, but the option would be nice without being forced to use AT&T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • As far as I know it's ubiquitous. Ultimately the network decides if you should use VoNR vs VoLTE but pretty much anytime my phone is in standalone mode and I place a call, it goes over NR.   Yup, it was terrible. After a while, I just connected to the WiFi, and that worked fine at about 90Mbps. I get the feeling that rather than doing a "real" upgrade where they install new antennas, upgrade backhaul, etc., T-Mobile instead installed new radios onto the existing and already overloaded DAS and called it a day, which isn't enough. Compared to Yankee Stadium, where they actually went and deployed new antennas/radios for their n41 upgrade, and you're able to get upwards of 200Mbps at sold-out games, Arthur Ashe really is a joke. What's worse is that the folks in their NOC likely know this already, but no effort is being made to change that. I'm not asking for T-Mobile to deploy mmWave everywhere like Verizon but there is a real use case for it at stadiums.
    • Does anyone know how well implemented is VoNR in the 5 boroughs. Does anyone use it? I have an iPhone 15 Pro. Does anyone know if T-Mobile is still working on upgrading their network? It seems like the service has gone down. My phone struggles in parts of the Belt Pkwy, and data is slow. 
    • I come to the US Open men’s semifinals and finals every year, and I’ve never been able to use my T-Mobile phone successfully. Usually AT&T is the top performer—good to hear Verizon has upped their game. 
    • One sector down, two more to go — — — — —  I was at Arthur Ashe Stadium for the U.S. Open today and the good news is that there is an n25/41 DAS setup throughout USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. From the "boardwalk" to the outdoor concession area, to inside the stadium; you connect to standalone n41 and n25 everywhere via oDAS and iDAS. The bad news is that in the actual stadium it's beyond useless. While I saw strong coverage as indicated by signal bars and I was able to make calls and send texts, there was no data throughput at all. Running a speed test failed 9 out of 10 times. The only time I got a speed test to work was by switching to LTE funnily enough or by using NSA 5G where the test would initiate via LTE and then n41 would kick in giving me ~20Mbps. T-Mobile has so much traffic on their 5G network that now n41 gets bogged down before LTE. That was a first for me! In the stadium in the same area Verizon got 1.2Gbps on mmWave and LTE kept timing out when trying to test it. My Boost line on AT&T got upwards of 150Mbps on C-band and I know they have mmWave deployed as I saw their Nokia mmWave antennas deployed but I was unable to test it. In the outdoor concession area T-Mobile performed well getting over 150Mbps on n41. AT&T in these areas saw over 250Mbps on C-band and I didn't get the opportunity to test Verizon there. It just seems like 140MHz n41 is not enough capacity for the amount of people inside the stadium. Hopefully T-Mobile is considering deploying n258 to all of these stadiums since they now own that mmWave nationwide. It'd make a world of difference in terms of capacity at these venues. Bonus Pics: Verizon and AT&T mmWave Hidden carrier neutral DAS: 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...