Jump to content

Calvin200

Recommended Posts

Sure thing max

 

Sent from my One using Tapatalk 2

So then the next cdma iphone will have band 12 right? And all androids from here on? And all hotspots? I meant at LEAST hotspots. Oh wait they don't. Edited by tuwsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then the next cdma iphone will have band 12 right? And all androids from here on? And all hotspots? I meant at LEAST hotspots. Oh wait they don't.

T-Mobile has more motivation than Sprint to incorporate Band 12 into its device requirements, because it actually owns a license. That said, I doubt it's really a huge motivation just yet, since it is only one license (that T-Mobile is mandated to build out this year, but T-Mobile will likely get an extension).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile has more motivation than Sprint to incorporate Band 12 into its device requirements, because it actually owns a license. That said, I doubt it's really a huge motivation just yet, since it is only one license (that T-Mobile is mandated to build out this year, but T-Mobile will likely get an extension).

Why would it build it out? It won't work on any phones until ch 51 is moved, right?

I think it'll sell it, rock bottom, rather than build it out to have nothing run on it.

TMO'd probably prefer losing it to FCC than being forced to build it out.

 

Do you think sprint will tell apple to include band 12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would it build it out? It won't work on any phones until ch 51 is moved, right?

I think it'll sell it, rock bottom, rather than build it out to have nothing run on it.

TMO'd probably prefer losing it to FCC than being forced to build it out.

 

Do you think sprint will tell apple to include band 12?

Uhh, because it has to?

 

The FCC could decide to review all licenses if it failed to build out on just one. That would be bad for any operator, as the "protection deployments" (or lack thereof) would likely not suffice under the current administration. Why do you think Clearwire and Sprint rushed to deploy WiMAX on BRS+EBS? No one wants to deal with that possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhh, because it has to?

 

The FCC could decide to review all licenses if it failed to build out on just one. That would be bad for any operator, as the "protection deployments" (or lack thereof) would likely not suffice under the current administration. Why do you think Clearwire and Sprint rushed to deploy WiMAX on BRS+EBS? No one wants to deal with that possibility.

Can't it donate that one license back to FCC?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've sold to VoiceStream before. Aerial Communications was the TDS' primary GSM venue (notwithstanding USCC Maine GSM). They could sell US Cellular to T-Mobile or Sprint. I suspect that a sale of US Cellular would be piecemeal. For example, the 700/850/AWS network would probably go to T-Mobile, while the 1900 network would go to Sprint (with maybe some swaps or whatever with T-Mobile for better contiguity and PCS block sanity).

Unless they could get the PCS for cheap I don't see Sprint spending the money to get scraps while T-Mobile walks away with the real prize (band 5). Especially when Sprint's network is already basically setup for it while T-Mobile would have to go back and add it on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless they could get the PCS for cheap I don't see Sprint spending the money to get scraps while T-Mobile walks away with the real prize (band 5). Especially when Sprint's network is already basically setup for it while T-Mobile would have to go back and add it on.

It's not just spectrum but 5mil customers. More scale.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Customers weren't mentioned at all and would only only make a piecemeal more tricky.

Sprint is not interested in AWS but they're definitely interested in customers, 700Mhz A block because of all the rural roaming. One thing that the upcoming 600 MHz auction will do is to remove the exclusion zones of Channel 51 threby making A Block usable. Sprint wants to have Block A as a roaming fallback in case they don't win enough or any of 600Mhz.If they can by some Block A on the way, then that's great. Son wants scale. He's not going to get it by attacking Verizon and AT&T. He will get it by mergers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is not interested in AWS but they're definitely interested in customers, 700Mhz A block because of all the rural roaming. One thing that the upcoming 600 MHz auction will do is to remove the exclusion zones of Channel 51 threby making A Block usable. Sprint wants to have Block A as a roaming fallback in case they don't win enough or any of 600Mhz.If they can by some Block A on the way, then that's great. Son wants scale. He's not going to get it by attacking Verizon and AT&T. He will get it by mergers.

I know that Sprint would sell any AWS it gets but as for the A block, I'm not sure what they would do with it. As far as the sale of USCC goes, like I said in this thread before, until they are signs that there is going to be a sale, it's just a silly rumor.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that Sprint would sell any AWS it gets but as for the A block, I'm not sure what they would do with it. As far as the sale of USCC goes, like I said in this thread before, until they are signs that there is going to be a sale, it's just a silly rumor.

What signs?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once this is public, I could see Verizon, ATT offering $$$ for pieces of USM to screw with sprint. If they're smart, they'd let TMO scavenge to make FCC/DOJ happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THERE ARE NO SIGNS OR SOURCES. But this is how rumors get started, so for the sake of sprint, lets not feed this. The fact that sprint is now well funded puts all of its competitors on the defensive

 

Sent from my Note II. Its so big.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have?! When did that happen?! Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

Sent from my One using Tapatalk 2Sent from my One using Tapatalk 2
No they haven't. That video says they're gonna support LTE roaming handoff between the bands, not that sprint will put band 12 on its phones.If sprint is really gonna do this, why do the a block holders keep screaming about device incompatibility?And why don't sprint phones have b12 today so it can be turned on later? Edited by tuwsy
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No they haven't. That video says they're gonna support LTE roaming handoff between the bands, not that sprint will put band 12 on its phones. If sprint is really gonna do this, why do the a block holders keep screaming about device incompatibility? And why don't sprint phones have b12 today so it can be turned on later?

 

After watching the video this is also my viewpoint. I didn't hear anything mentioning adding band 12 to Sprint phones. Also if they were going this route, I don't think we would have upcoming triband phones, but quadband ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After watching the video this is also my viewpoint. I didn't hear anything mentioning adding band 12 to Sprint phones. Also if they were going this route, I don't think we would have upcoming triband phones, but quadband ones.

He doesn't specifically say band 12 but he does talk about roaming on 700 MHz and you need band 12 to do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn't specifically say band 12 but he does talk about roaming on 700 MHz and you need band 12 to do that.

Roaming of rural carriers onto sprint's network enabled by rural carriers including bands 25, 26 on their phones.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roaming of rural carriers onto sprint's network enabled by rural carriers including bands 25, 26 on their phones.

But he talks about roaming being about the customers and what about Sprint customers roaming on rural carriers? You need band 12 and unless they use some other bands, you can't get around that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But he talks about roaming being about the customers and what about Sprint customers roaming on rural carriers? You need band 12 and unless they use some other bands, you can't get around that.

My opinion is that this more about making money from rural carriers than about sprint customers having more LTE coverage. What fraction of sprint customers roam (once nv is done)? Is it worth putting band 12 on ALL sprint phones for that small fraction?

 

Why don't the rurals just build out LTE band 26? They'd instantly have voice and LTE coverage and roaming onto sprint and they wouldn't have to worry about getting band 12 devices.

 

Qualcomm's transceivers are very specific in number/type of bands they can handle. Forgot which one but one of them can do:

(Example config for CDMA carriers)

3x low band: 26, 13, 5

(sprint, VZW, VZW)

3x mid band: aws, pcs, band 1

(TMO/VZW, VZW/sprint. ?Softy?)

1x high band: 2.5 ghz (sprint, softy)

 

And we're done. Where you gonna fit band 12? You want sprint to pay a premium to apple to get its own band 12 CDMA phone?

Edited by tuwsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...