ericdabbs Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Looks like Verizon plans to start refarming PCS spectrum for LTE sometime in 2015. I wonder how many towers will they add LTE on PCS spectrum. http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-start-refarming-pcs-spectrum-lte-2015/2013-06-27 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefbal99 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Look for Verizon to also be aggressive with LTE Advanced. According to Palmer, the company will deploy LTE Advanced features such as carrier aggregation strategically where it needs it. She declined to give a timeframe for deploying LTE Advanced but said that Verizon is aggressively looking at carrier aggregation for its 700 MHz and AWS spectrum. Read more: Verizon to start refarming PCS spectrum for LTE in 2015 - FierceWireless http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-start-refarming-pcs-spectrum-lte-2015/2013-06-27#ixzz2XR7VKzpy Subscribe at FierceWireless I thought Big Red's 750Mhz LTE base stations and antennas were all Rel 8 and couldn't support the new versions of LTE? Maybe with the AWS spectrum deployment they are replacing/updating cabinets with newer equipment? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mondays In Flames Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I read an article that states VZW plans to go LTE only in 2014, that's pretty drastic considering if their LTE network ever goes down, their customers don't have another data connection to fall back on. (Not sure if your article states that, sorry I didn't read, but I thought I would put this out there) -Luis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deval Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I thought Big Red's 750Mhz LTE base stations and antennas were all Rel 8 and couldn't support the new versions of LTE? Maybe with the AWS spectrum deployment they are replacing/updating cabinets with newer equipment? I'm sure they have the $$ to push through an NV-like project pretty quickly, since their existing footprint is basically on 800 or 1900mhz spacing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericdabbs Posted June 27, 2013 Author Share Posted June 27, 2013 I am curious if Verizon plans to follow Sprint and ATT and upgrade its network equipment to install RRUs up next to the panels instead of ground mounted radios. I mean if they have to upgrade anyways to add AWS LTE and other things to be LTE-Advanced compliant, I don't see why Verizon wouldn't invest the capital in infrastructure to do so. I am curious if Tmobile's approach with the Ericcson AIR panels (radio+antenna combined) is the future of wireless antenna deployment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevster1321 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 They have been pulling permits for AWS antennas in CT for over six months and it doesn't say anything about replacing cabinets or anything like that. all it says is they are replacing 3 PCS for 3 AWS. Edit: so I just went back and looked at the permits and they are replacing most or all the antennas but are not using multi mode antennas. So it's 3 PCS 3 AWS 3 cellular 3 LTE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irev210 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I would guess Verizon will pick whatever offers them the lowest total lifecycle costs - capital costs be darned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jefbal99 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 They have been pulling permits for AWS antennas in CT for over six months and it doesn't say anything about replacing cabinets or anything like that. all it says is they are replacing 3 PCS for 3 AWS. So they are replacing PCS only antennas with PCS/AWS combo antennas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevster1321 Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 So they are replacing PCS only antennas with PCS/AWS combo antennas? no it looks like they are setting it up for 3 antennas of each a total off 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TechSmurf Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 In Tucson they're running one hybrid cable up the tower to a junction box and splitting the fiber off to 1 alcalu AWS RRU per sector, generally behind one dedicated AWS panel. None of the plans involve any retrofit to existing equipment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shockerengr Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 I would guess Verizon will pick whatever offers them the lowest total lifecycle costs - capital costs be darned. It seems more like this would be the other way around - keeping capital costs down at the expense of running costs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TechSmurf Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Just found another Tucson plan that does involve replacement of some non-AWS equipment at the same time.. but they're running a pair of 1 5/8" coax up the tower for some of the new panels in addition to the hybriflex and reusing 12 existing coax. No RRUs other than the 1/sector for AWS. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
briank86 Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I'm sure they have the $$ to push through an NV-like project pretty quickly, since their existing footprint is basically on 800 or 1900mhz spacing. Solely having money will not guarantee a quick network overhaul considering union crews are involved.Union crews can only complete as much work as they have manpower. Contract crews help to provide additional bandwidth when needed. Sprint only used contractors, thus speeding up the process tremendously. The only real benefit Verizon will have is their backhaul and some equipment is already in place. I expect for them to have just as long of a process if not longer. Although by then Sprint's network should be nearing completion, possibly with tri-band LTE advanced and 1XA covering almost all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffDTD Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I cant wait to hear the network experience opinions of the people who jump at the first LTE only handsets. Hopefully, they will be priced more aggressively thus creating an artificial draw to them for some of the very penny pinchers who take to the forums to sprint hate Sent from my Note II. Its so big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deval Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I cant wait to hear the network experience opinions of the people who jump at the first LTE only handsets. Hopefully, they will be priced more aggressively thus creating an artificial draw to them for some of the very penny pinchers who take to the forums to sprint hate Sent from my Note II. Its so big. I doubt it, once a Sprint hater, always a Sprint hater, according to Sprintusers.com 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geesmill Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Solely having money will not guarantee a quick network overhaul considering union crews are involved.Union crews can only complete as much work as they have manpower. Contract crews help to provide additional bandwidth when needed. Sprint only used contractors, thus speeding up the process tremendously. The only real benefit Verizon will have is their backhaul and some equipment is already in place. I expect for them to have just as long of a process if not longer. Although by then Sprint's network should be nearing completion, possibly with tri-band LTE advanced and 1XA covering almost all. I find it hard to believe VZW uses union anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryry4ya Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 Solely having money will not guarantee a quick network overhaul considering union crews are involved.Union crews can only complete as much work as they have manpower. Contract crews help to provide additional bandwidth when needed. Sprint only used contractors, thus speeding up the process tremendously. The only real benefit Verizon will have is their backhaul and some equipment is already in place. I expect for them to have just as long of a process if not longer. Although by then Sprint's network should be nearing completion, possibly with tri-band LTE advanced and 1XA covering almost all. I find it hard to believe VZW uses union anything. ..they do in Toledo, OH ( I talked to a few )...but, I saw 6 Alcatel Lucent vans going through the town and they ended up with brand new big fat panels. There's squared big ones. Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geesmill Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 ..they do in Toledo, OH ( I talked to a few )...but, I saw 6 Alcatel Lucent vans going through the town and they ended up with brand new big fat panels. There's squared big ones. Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2 I stand corrected, I forgot Lucent or whatever they are called now has CWA/IBEW members. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmike Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 Union crews can only complete as much work as they have manpower. Am I misunderstanding something? Isn't the ability to perform manual labor always limited by manpower availability, regardless of union affiliation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milan03 Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 I am curious if Verizon plans to follow Sprint and ATT and upgrade its network equipment to install RRUs up next to the panels instead of ground mounted radios. I mean if they have to upgrade anyways to add AWS LTE and other things to be LTE-Advanced compliant, I don't see why Verizon wouldn't invest the capital in infrastructure to do so. I am curious if Tmobile's approach with the Ericcson AIR panels (radio+antenna combined) is the future of wireless antenna deployment. In the next 2-3 years, AIR-like solutions are gonna be the norm as you're effectively eliminating most unwanted signal loss at the sectors. I've been meaning to bring to your attention that Ubidyne already has 3GPP2 solution for Antenna Integrated Radios, so that's coming. Hoping that Sprint will look into this solution. http://www.pegasplanet.com/news/000009797Picture.jpg That said, I'm already seeing existing Verizon eNb cell sites with RRUs added! Months ago: http://i.imgur.com/SghZWkk.jpg Now: http://i.imgur.com/Hx0RAeo.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 That's probably when I expect Sprint to start refarming their PCS A-F holdings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deval Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 In the next 2-3 years, AIR-like solutions are gonna be the norm as you're effectively eliminating most unwanted signal loss at the sectors. I've been meaning to bring to your attention that Ubidyne already has 3GPP2 solution for Antenna Integrated Radios, so that's coming. Hoping that Sprint will look into this solution. http://www.pegasplanet.com/news/000009797Picture.jpg That said, I'm already seeing existing Verizon eNb cell sites with RRUs added! Months ago: http://i.imgur.com/SghZWkk.jpg Now: http://i.imgur.com/Hx0RAeo.jpg But correct me if I'm wrong, they are only deploying RRUs for their AWS panels, not legacy 700mhz and 1900/800 panels, correct? So basically they are adding more panels per site? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milan03 Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 But correct me if I'm wrong, they are only deploying RRUs for their AWS panels, not legacy 700mhz and 1900/800 panels, correct? So basically they are adding more panels per site? I think these are multimode 700/AWS now with RRU. 800/1900 is where their CDMA stuff is that's separate. Verizon has so much funding, who knows what next lol... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deval Posted July 1, 2013 Share Posted July 1, 2013 I think these are multimode 700/AWS now with RRU. 800/1900 is where their CDMA stuff is that's separate. Verizon has so much funding, who knows what next lol... Ok makes sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ericdabbs Posted July 1, 2013 Author Share Posted July 1, 2013 I think these are multimode 700/AWS now with RRU. 800/1900 is where their CDMA stuff is that's separate. Verizon has so much funding, who knows what next lol... What would be nice is if we can see the FCC document that shows what band classes these Verizon RRUs support to confirm that is multimodal 700/AWS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.