Jump to content

LG G2 -- the first Sprint tri band LTE handset (was "LG Optimus G2")


Thai

Recommended Posts

According to this page, it appears we'll get a 32GB variant.

 

http://www.lg.com/global/g2/sub3.html

 

 

Says Battery is 3000 MAh, and it's got 1x/EvDo as the supported radios. So I know this specs page is referring to international version, rather than Korean version.

I think they're being general on that page. If you notice in the LTE part it lists SVLTE but we know from FCC documentation that the Sprint variant doesn't have that. Also, I can't remember which one but one of the Korean operators uses (or used) 1XEVDO.

 

EDIT: It appears that the operator that uses EVDO was, ironically, LG U+.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it definite that its not going to be SVLTE?

 

 

Theres no chance that the analysis of the FCC filing is false?!@!@#

 

Yes its pretty definitive that it won't support SVLTE. In order to have SVLTE, the phone must have separate transmission paths for CDMA and LTE.  See below on more details.  Like they say the proof is in the pudding.

 

We will start with the LG G2.  From looking at the FCC filing for LG G2 screenshot below (Left screenshot) you can see that CDMA AND LTE 800/1900 (BC 25 and BC 26) go through the same antenna (lavender color).  Also you can see from the screenshot below (left bottom screenshot) that there are only 2 transmission paths for the LG G2 ...all the cellular stuff (LTE, CDMA/EVDO) in Path 1 and BT/Wifi in Path 2.

 

Contrast that with the Galaxy S4 which supports SVLTE where CDMA and LTE 1900 go through separate paths.  From the screenshot below (middle screenshot), CDMA has one path (yellow color) and LTE has one path (red color).

 

Unfortunately it looks like at least the first generation of triband LTE devices do not support SVLTE.  Perhaps triband LTE devices in 2014 could bring back SVLTE but I doubt it.  I personally don't talk and surf at all really so this won't affect me much but it would still be a nice handy feature to have.

 

 

Source for Galaxy S4 info, AJ and his article

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-343-updated-a-short-time-from-now-in-a-galaxy-not-far-away/

LG G2.jpg

Galaxy S4.jpg

LG G2 Tx Paths.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes its pretty definitive that it won't support SVLTE. In order to have SVLTE, the phone must have separate paths for CDMA and LTE.

 

We will start with the LG G2. From looking at the FCC for LG G2 screenshot below (Left screenshot) you can see that CDMA AND LTE 800/1900 (BC 25 and BC 26) go through the same antenna (lavender color).

Looks like it could theoretically support SVLTE on BC 41 (ex-Clearwire TD-LTE 2500), since those use completely separate antennas, but whether the radio and baseband will support doing that is a different question entirely. And that would be of limited utility in most markets anyway.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it could theoretically support SVLTE on BC 41 (ex-Clearwire TD-LTE 2500), since those use completely separate antennas, but whether the radio and baseband will support doing that is a different question entirely. And that would be of limited utility in most markets anyway.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

 

Right I remember I brought this issue up before in some post either in this thread or somewhere else that perhaps BC41 (LTE 2600) would be able to perform SVLTE but I remember AJ replied back saying that it wasn't able to.  I am trying to look for the post but I can't remember where I posted.  I do remember it because another poster brought up the idea and I responded to it which got me thinking.

 

If it were able to perform SVLTE over BC41 only, it would be rather strange that the functionality would work sometimes and not others (assuming you are not an LTE engineering menu addict).

 

Maybe AJ can chime in as to what his explanation was that not even BC41 would be able to do SVLTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like it could theoretically support SVLTE on BC 41 (ex-Clearwire TD-LTE 2500), since those use completely separate antennas, but whether the radio and baseband will support doing that is a different question entirely. And that would be of limited utility in most markets anyway.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

I dunno, on my WiMax device I find Clearwire 2500 fairly useful (I can use WiMax while talking but not 3g).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, on my WiMax device I find Clearwire 2500 fairly useful (I can use WiMax while talking but not 3g).

 

that is because Wimax and CDMA are on separate transmission paths.  CDMA and EVDO (3G) share the same transmission path hence no 3G while talking.

 

I have the Moto Photon and I am able to use 4G and talk at the same time but not 3G and talk at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is because Wimax and CDMA are on separate transmission paths.  CDMA and EVDO (3G) share the same transmission path hence no 3G while talking.

 

I have the Moto Photon and I am able to use 4G and talk at the same time but not 3G and talk at the same time.

Yeah I get that but my poorly made point was that being able to get data from Clearwire towers is only of "limited utility" until you consider how many towers they will be putting 2500 LTE on vs how many Clear towers currently broadcast WiMax. I think it would be of great use to do this but I doubt it will be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe AJ can chime in as to what his explanation was that not even BC41 would be able to do SVLTE.

 

Separate antennas do not necessarily entail totally separate radio paths.  The separate antennas could be on the same radio path with a pole switch in between.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Separate antennas do not necessarily entail totally separate radio paths.  The separate antennas could be on the same radio path with a pole switch in between.

 

AJ

 

So where do you read in the FCC filings in generatl that talks about all the transmission paths that are available on a phone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Separate antennas do not necessarily entail totally separate radio paths. The separate antennas could be on the same radio path with a pole switch in between.

 

AJ

I once saw a dancer make a fantastic pole switch...

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So where do you read in the FCC filings in generatl that talks about all the transmission paths that are available on a phone?

 

The simultaneous transmission modes, hence transmission paths, are usually detailed under the SAR testing.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I once saw a dancer make a fantastic pole switch...

 

...while you were switching your pole in your pocket?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mid September for At&t and Verizon. Sprint is usually either ahead or on par with at&t in terms of release so we'll see. :P

 

http://m.androidcentral.com/lg-g2-launching-us-carriers-mid-september

 

It can't be.....Verizon releasing a flagship phone before the rest of the major carriers.  This must be a typo...haha.  I guess LG and Verizon were able to resolve the Verizon logo issues a lot faster than HTC and Verizon with the HTC One.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gah! The lack of information on this device is killing me! Somebody supply me with new Sprint info!

What info do you want that hasn't already been given? I'm interested in seeing what people think of it, but as far as I know no one even has any review samples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What info do you want that hasn't already been given? I'm interested in seeing what people think of it, but as far as I know no one even has any review samples.

Looking for a release date. I'm sold on the device.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gah! The lack of information on this device is killing me! Somebody supply me with new Sprint info!

What info do you want that hasn't already been given?

 

The information is already out there.  "The cat totally out of the bag!  You're still standing here debating.  Don, what the hell else do you need?"

 

(NSFW)

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFbNRS-1WVw

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...