Jump to content

Report: Sprint Deal Unlikely to Get Past Clearwire Shareholders


cletus

Recommended Posts

http://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/2013/05/17/report-sprint-deal-unlikely-to-get-past-clearwire-shareholders/

 

According to an analysis by Reuters, investors that own a combined 31% stake in Clearwire have said in statements or interviews with the news service that they are unsatisfied with the current proposal up for a vote on May 21.

At least 50% of Clearwire’s minority shareholders must vote in favor of the deal for it to go forward.

 

Meanwhile Clearwire doesn't have the financing to continue it's network upgrades :rolleyes:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Clearwire recently told their shareholders essentially that if they did not approve the deal, they were going to skip their next debt payment and possibly go into bankruptcy.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It ends up being a big mess when shareholders and bondholders and management all have conflicting interests.

 

I think the logical step that SoftBank will take, despite past rhetoric, will be to sweeten the pot. At that point, Clear shareholders will likely vote in acceptance of the deal. In other words, I'm not overly concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It ends up being a big mess when shareholders and bondholders and management all have conflicting interests.

 

I think the logical step that SoftBank will take, despite past rhetoric, will be to sweeten the pot. At that point, Clear shareholders will likely vote in acceptance of the deal. In other words, I'm not overly concerned.

 

Or wait until September or October when Sprint's agreement expires and then they only need 65% of the vote. Sprint already has those votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Or wait until September or October when Sprint's agreement expires and then they only need 65% of the vote. Sprint already has those votes.

 

Wouldn't bankruptcy affect those dynamics quite drastically? Why not just raise the offer, avoid bankruptcy, outbid Charlie, and be on the way, rather than having to deal with the messy and retracted process of bankruptcy?

 

That literally makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the deal is voted down and anything else happens that causes Uncle Char-Char to think his bid for Sprint isn't going to be successful, he is going to barrel in with another bid for Clear and I'm certain it will be very, very high...... Not because it makes sense, but because if he fails to get Sprint, he will stop at nothing to complicate sprint's future in every way possible.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the deal is voted down and anything else happens that causes Uncle Char-Char to think his bid for Sprint isn't going to be successful, he is going to barrel in with another bid for Clear and I'm certain it will be very, very high...... Not because it makes sense, but because if he fails to get Sprint, he will stop at nothing to complicate sprint's future in every way possible.

 

That's precisely why SoftBank should up their bid.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Son thinks there is a chance that Sprint will accept Dish's offer or they will end up in a bidding war, what purpose does an incremental increase in the Clear bid (that pulls just enough support for passage) accomplish? Some of the Clear shareholders, Crest specifically, are out there babbling on about wanting $7 or more a share. If Charlie is the Sprint winner, let Crest win as many other shareholders over as they can... $7? Heck, why not $10!

 

Once (and if) the Clear bid fails, Clear then becomes another debt obligation for Sprint= 1) Prevent bankruptcy or up the offer until 2) the bylaws can be amended and other acquisition avenues pursued. Either way, Clear continues to be a debt obligation and another anchor around the neck of a potentially merged "Dish/Sprint" that Charlie won't have the $$$ or borrowing capacity to afford.

 

And of course, Sprint could simply vote against a Dish acquisition of Clear, no matter how high the price. If the Clear bid fails, i'm in support of giving the shareholders a megaphone and flooding the market with insane demands. It puts Charlie in an even more uncomfortable position.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And of course, Sprint could simply vote against a Dish acquisition of Clear, no matter how high the price. If the Clear bid fails, i'm in support of giving the shareholders a megaphone and flooding the market with insane demands. It puts Charlie in an even more uncomfortable position.

 

Megaphone. Maybe that would be a good rebranding for Sprint if Ergen somehow wins this bidding war.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somehow I believe that IF Dish pulls this off all that Charlie will have is spectrum, a huge pile of debt,and potentially an unfinished rollout of NV... for some reason I just can't see the real motive here: who really wants to watch TV or movies on a mobile device?  That business model, IMHO, implies a huge paradigm shift in how we use our smart phones..possibly I'm showing my age here!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole thing is a giant game of chicken.

 

Sprint loses a bunch of equity as well if Clearwire goes into BK.

 

It's a lose/lose if the result is BK.  The bigger question is - who has more to lose?  Sprint or the minority equity holders?

 

At this point, even Verizon has suggested, by making an offer on some clearwire spectrum, that in BK situation they would bid on assets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somehow I believe that IF Dish pulls this off all that Charlie will have is spectrum, a huge pile of debt,and potentially an unfinished rollout of NV... for some reason I just can't see the real motive here: who really wants to watch TV or movies on a mobile device?  That business model, IMHO, implies a huge paradigm shift in how we use our smart phones..possibly I'm showing my age here!!

 

Yea at which point he dismantles Sprint and sells off its spectrum to its secret partner Verizon/AT&T.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole thing is a giant game of chicken.

 

Sprint loses a bunch of equity as well if Clearwire goes into BK.

 

 

If Clearwire were to go into BK, that would be quite the whopper.  It could cause a feeding frenzy, but I wonder who would be left holding the bag.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea at which point he dismantles Sprint and sells off its spectrum to its secret partner Verizon/AT&T.

I think you've hit on it..Dish might even have the FCC over a barrel on this as it would not want the spectrum to go unused and it probably could not force Dish to employ it..Dish makes a ton on the sale and 4 carriers is whittled down to three..I guess it could go down like this...huge gamble on the part of Dish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Clearwire were to go into BK, that would be quite the whopper.  It could cause a feeding frenzy, but I wonder who would be left holding the bag.

 

AJ

shareholders like myself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

shareholders like myself

Maybe there would be a few fries left in the bag for you.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 5,000 shares of CLWR myself.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearwire will not go into bankruptcy. Sprint will fund them until October with convertible bonds. Again, I am of the rather firm opinion that Sprint should sell the EBS leases and Clearwire network to Dish, when Dish comes up with an offer that Sprint likes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well, that's never a good sign.  It's interesting that these minority shareholders have convinced themselves that there are any other viable suitors for Clearwire.  Or that Sprint, being the majority shareholder would ever vote to sell to anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Tbh not that surprising. Every ISP seems to want to have an MVNO to pitch to their customers to make them stickier and maybe make some money in the process. And unlike USCC the MVNO should be able to cover TDS's entire wireline area, with infrastructure costs that are borne by someone else. Entertaining, yes. Surprising, not really...particularly when competing against Comcast or Spectrum, or even eventually T-Mobile fixed + mobile. This also strengthens my bet that they'll rebrand all their fixed wireless stuff as TDS, as that runs on spectrum they're keeping for now.
    • No? RCS on Google messages works great for me, messages between anyone with RCS enabled go through with no problems. Don't remember the last time I had an issue. I only have issues with people on iPhones on different carriers from T-Mobile.
    • Has anyone experienced a ridiculous amount of difficulty with Google messages with RCS enabled?  It has been a train wreck for me for the past year so I now use WhatsApp.  That works very well for all of us.... Android and iOS.  
    • Probably not worth the fiddling given that that's a few percent of the band. Also, if they really wanted to push my assumption is there are still guard bands in play for the n41 carriers so they could fit two "100 MHz" carriers into 194 MHz anyway. Looks like minimum guard band is less than 1 MHz and a 100 MHz channel is only 273 30 KHz resource blocks, which is a bit over 80 MHz total, so if they really wanted to pull another 5% or so capacity out they could.
    • Saw that for a while. Now back to n25 + n71 + n41-100Mhz + n41-90Mhz.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...