cletus Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 http://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/2013/05/17/report-sprint-deal-unlikely-to-get-past-clearwire-shareholders/ According to an analysis by Reuters, investors that own a combined 31% stake in Clearwire have said in statements or interviews with the news service that they are unsatisfied with the current proposal up for a vote on May 21.At least 50% of Clearwire’s minority shareholders must vote in favor of the deal for it to go forward. Meanwhile Clearwire doesn't have the financing to continue it's network upgrades 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 And Clearwire recently told their shareholders essentially that if they did not approve the deal, they were going to skip their next debt payment and possibly go into bankruptcy. Robert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraydog Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 It ends up being a big mess when shareholders and bondholders and management all have conflicting interests. I think the logical step that SoftBank will take, despite past rhetoric, will be to sweeten the pot. At that point, Clear shareholders will likely vote in acceptance of the deal. In other words, I'm not overly concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 It ends up being a big mess when shareholders and bondholders and management all have conflicting interests. I think the logical step that SoftBank will take, despite past rhetoric, will be to sweeten the pot. At that point, Clear shareholders will likely vote in acceptance of the deal. In other words, I'm not overly concerned. Or wait until September or October when Sprint's agreement expires and then they only need 65% of the vote. Sprint already has those votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraydog Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Or wait until September or October when Sprint's agreement expires and then they only need 65% of the vote. Sprint already has those votes. Wouldn't bankruptcy affect those dynamics quite drastically? Why not just raise the offer, avoid bankruptcy, outbid Charlie, and be on the way, rather than having to deal with the messy and retracted process of bankruptcy? That literally makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffDTD Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 If the deal is voted down and anything else happens that causes Uncle Char-Char to think his bid for Sprint isn't going to be successful, he is going to barrel in with another bid for Clear and I'm certain it will be very, very high...... Not because it makes sense, but because if he fails to get Sprint, he will stop at nothing to complicate sprint's future in every way possible. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraydog Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 If the deal is voted down and anything else happens that causes Uncle Char-Char to think his bid for Sprint isn't going to be successful, he is going to barrel in with another bid for Clear and I'm certain it will be very, very high...... Not because it makes sense, but because if he fails to get Sprint, he will stop at nothing to complicate sprint's future in every way possible. That's precisely why SoftBank should up their bid. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scubajwd Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Ugly unprintable thoughts creep in here..... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffDTD Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 If Son thinks there is a chance that Sprint will accept Dish's offer or they will end up in a bidding war, what purpose does an incremental increase in the Clear bid (that pulls just enough support for passage) accomplish? Some of the Clear shareholders, Crest specifically, are out there babbling on about wanting $7 or more a share. If Charlie is the Sprint winner, let Crest win as many other shareholders over as they can... $7? Heck, why not $10! Once (and if) the Clear bid fails, Clear then becomes another debt obligation for Sprint= 1) Prevent bankruptcy or up the offer until 2) the bylaws can be amended and other acquisition avenues pursued. Either way, Clear continues to be a debt obligation and another anchor around the neck of a potentially merged "Dish/Sprint" that Charlie won't have the $$$ or borrowing capacity to afford. And of course, Sprint could simply vote against a Dish acquisition of Clear, no matter how high the price. If the Clear bid fails, i'm in support of giving the shareholders a megaphone and flooding the market with insane demands. It puts Charlie in an even more uncomfortable position. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 And of course, Sprint could simply vote against a Dish acquisition of Clear, no matter how high the price. If the Clear bid fails, i'm in support of giving the shareholders a megaphone and flooding the market with insane demands. It puts Charlie in an even more uncomfortable position. Megaphone. Maybe that would be a good rebranding for Sprint if Ergen somehow wins this bidding war. AJ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scubajwd Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Somehow I believe that IF Dish pulls this off all that Charlie will have is spectrum, a huge pile of debt,and potentially an unfinished rollout of NV... for some reason I just can't see the real motive here: who really wants to watch TV or movies on a mobile device? That business model, IMHO, implies a huge paradigm shift in how we use our smart phones..possibly I'm showing my age here!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irev210 Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 The whole thing is a giant game of chicken. Sprint loses a bunch of equity as well if Clearwire goes into BK. It's a lose/lose if the result is BK. The bigger question is - who has more to lose? Sprint or the minority equity holders? At this point, even Verizon has suggested, by making an offer on some clearwire spectrum, that in BK situation they would bid on assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luuminator Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 If it fails I don't think Sprint will approve anyone to buy clear, so thoses other shareholders are screwed. Thats my personal opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted May 18, 2013 Author Share Posted May 18, 2013 In the Game of Loans, you accept the Sprint offer or go bankrupt trying. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebody00 Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Somehow I believe that IF Dish pulls this off all that Charlie will have is spectrum, a huge pile of debt,and potentially an unfinished rollout of NV... for some reason I just can't see the real motive here: who really wants to watch TV or movies on a mobile device? That business model, IMHO, implies a huge paradigm shift in how we use our smart phones..possibly I'm showing my age here!! Yea at which point he dismantles Sprint and sells off its spectrum to its secret partner Verizon/AT&T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 The whole thing is a giant game of chicken. Sprint loses a bunch of equity as well if Clearwire goes into BK. If Clearwire were to go into BK, that would be quite the whopper. It could cause a feeding frenzy, but I wonder who would be left holding the bag. AJ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scubajwd Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 Yea at which point he dismantles Sprint and sells off its spectrum to its secret partner Verizon/AT&T. I think you've hit on it..Dish might even have the FCC over a barrel on this as it would not want the spectrum to go unused and it probably could not force Dish to employ it..Dish makes a ton on the sale and 4 carriers is whittled down to three..I guess it could go down like this...huge gamble on the part of Dish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielholt Posted May 18, 2013 Share Posted May 18, 2013 If Clearwire were to go into BK, that would be quite the whopper. It could cause a feeding frenzy, but I wonder who would be left holding the bag. AJ shareholders like myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 shareholders like myself Maybe there would be a few fries left in the bag for you. AJ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 I have 5,000 shares of CLWR myself. Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted May 19, 2013 Share Posted May 19, 2013 Clearwire will not go into bankruptcy. Sprint will fund them until October with convertible bonds. Again, I am of the rather firm opinion that Sprint should sell the EBS leases and Clearwire network to Dish, when Dish comes up with an offer that Sprint likes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geesmill Posted May 20, 2013 Share Posted May 20, 2013 I guess we will see what happens tomorrow. Clearwire aquisition shareholder vote scheduled for 05/21/13, Tuesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawvega Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 The vote apparently has been postponed: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/clearwire_shareholder_vote_postponed_6EdqTZjGXe889DTt6kvqHM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marioc21 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 The vote apparently has been postponed: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/clearwire_shareholder_vote_postponed_6EdqTZjGXe889DTt6kvqHM Well, that's never a good sign. It's interesting that these minority shareholders have convinced themselves that there are any other viable suitors for Clearwire. Or that Sprint, being the majority shareholder would ever vote to sell to anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IamMrFamous07 Posted May 21, 2013 Share Posted May 21, 2013 Maybe the vote got postponed so sprint can work up a better deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts