Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Upper Central Valley Market (Sacramento, Stockton, Redding, Eureka & Reno/Lake Tahoe)


iwalkthrowwalls

Recommended Posts

It means that Sprint and Samsung is inching closer to finally converting every single site in the Sacramento cluster of about 40-50 cell towers/sites. Once all are converted they fire them all up at the same time (cluster launching) for 3G and 4G will go live too on any site with high speed backhaul (high speed internet connection) delivered by contracted companies. If that site has backhaul delivered then LTE will be fired up on that site when they do the final cluster launch of our market.

 

Can't be more than a few weeks now.

You mean there is light at the end of the tunnel, Sacramento should be cluster launched in a few weeks?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that estimate is accurate (and you have been very understandably hesitant to quote timeframes before), that should coincide with what I am HOPING is the release and availability of a tri-band Samsung Note 4. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that estimate is accurate (and you have been very understandably hesitant to quote timeframes before), that should coincide with what I am HOPING is the release and availability of a tri-band Samsung Note 4. :-)

A reliable source of the S4GRU webmaster is pretty encouraging.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got some Sensorly mapping done in and around Mather and on my way into work to catch some of the new LTE signals that went live in Rancho. It's a lot more dependable since they first went live. Good times.  :)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm interested in knowing how good coverage will be while traveling (driving) long-ish distances.

 

For example, if I'm driving up I-5 or 99, I wonder how spotty the coverage will be as all the remaining Sprint covered areas get updated to 4G LTE.

 

As of right now, my current service, verizon, has me connected darn near everywhere I go. I'm trying to decide if the trade off for unlimited data is worth it for the loss in coverage.

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's your call. I haven't had much of a problem when traveling unless I'm in a known spotty area (between Woodland and Red Bluff is off and on, but last time I drove through, it was consistent). Traveling south along 99 between Sacramento and San Diego last month was awesome coverage with the exception of the grapevine between Grapevine and Gorman. Other than that, it was great. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Arden area keeps getting short, intermittent signal losses. I lost all data for about 20-30 seconds at a time today, but several minutes on Friday. Are they doing work on the towers here and in Downtown?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's your call. I haven't had much of a problem when traveling unless I'm in a known spotty area (between Woodland and Red Bluff is off and on, but last time I drove through, it was consistent). Traveling south along 99 between Sacramento and San Diego last month was awesome coverage with the exception of the grapevine between Grapevine and Gorman. Other than that, it was great. 

 

Earlier this year when I still had sprint, I drove up to Eureka and passed through a couple sections with no service. I am guessing that I experienced no data service for about a total of 1 1/2 hours out of the 5(ish) hour drive. Was bummed out but there are a lot of hills and trees around that probably don't help much. Not sure about the south bound drive, never tried to stream music or used a service that required constant data usage while driving south. I would assume that it would be better since the land is pretty flat.

 

I'll probably end up switching back anyway. As long as I can listen to spotify on my normal morning commute with no interruptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Earlier this year when I still had sprint, I drove up to Eureka and passed through a couple sections with no service. I am guessing that I experienced no data service for about a total of 1 1/2 hours out of the 5(ish) hour drive. Was bummed out but there are a lot of hills and trees around that probably don't help much. Not sure about the south bound drive, never tried to stream music or used a service that required constant data usage while driving south. I would assume that it would be better since the land is pretty flat.

 

I'll probably end up switching back anyway. As long as I can listen to spotify on my normal morning commute with no interruptions.

I was in bodega bay recently and I had completely no service. It wouldn't even go into roam even though other people had service.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The North Coast is awful with reception. I usually don't even have my phone on when I go that way. But, in the flat valley interior, it's pretty good overall except for some spotty areas around Mt. Shasta. The hilly environment isn't very conducive to a clear signal. I use Spotify and Pandora very often on my drives in the car and I haven't had any issues driving north on I-5 or south on Hwy 99. Yes, I assume it's probably because it's relatively flat. And the markets that direction are pretty built out at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume that "few years" remark is sarcasm. Be mindful that there's been a lot of confusion in this tread and someone may very well think that is literally true.

Sure the Sac cluster will be launched soon, but it will take months, maybe years till we see PCS/SMR LTE and not drop down to 3G because random cell sites don't have backhaul. Forget about TD-LTE.

 

Anybody see those new Family Plans sprint unveiled today? BS! I don't think a phone left to download 24/7 can even download 20GB in a month given how slow their network is. Verizon new $60/2GB talk/text + device subsidy sounds enticing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure the Sac cluster will be launched soon, but it will take months, maybe years till we see PCS/SMR LTE and not drop down to 3G because random cell sites don't have backhaul. Forget about TD-LTE.

 

Anybody see those new Family Plans sprint unveiled today? BS! I don't think a phone left to download 24/7 can even download 20GB in a month given how slow their network is. Verizon new $60/2GB talk/text + device subsidy sounds enticing.

 

Feel free to go to Verizon.

 

There may be others that may have what you want. Don't limit yourself just because. All we can do here is make sure you and others are informed and make the right decisions for yourselves.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure the Sac cluster will be launched soon, but it will take months, maybe years till we see PCS/SMR LTE and not drop down to 3G because random cell sites don't have backhaul. Forget about TD-LTE.

 

Your sarcastic "Correction: few years" comment was in response to someone asking about when the cluster launch was expected in the City of Sacramento. Those of us who have been following this thread closely for the past year understand that a cluster launch is not the end game but it is a significant milestone -- significant enough for me to plan on becoming a Sprint customer when that happens (and not a moment sooner), and significant enough for existing Sprint customers here to consider hanging on with Sprint with that milestone being within view. Will it be perfect and as good as Verizon on Day One of cluster launch? Of course not. I don't think most of us expect that. But with my clunker 3G Android 2.3.4 phone with insufficient memory to handle even basic use, I'm looking forward to getting a cutting edge device with WiFi calling on a decent network that will only get better with an unlimited data plan.

 

Hopefully the rest of the commentary in this thread is on point.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After getting a G3, I now can get LTE pretty easy at my house, work, and even the GYM. All speeds 3Mbit+ so I am happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So does the Samsung cluster influence Davis at all?

What do you mean?  What samsung cluster?  Davis has been cluster launched already.  All that's left is upgrading the last 4 towers with new backhaul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, driving home yesterday, I picked up LTE on the eastbound 50 between Watt and Bradshaw exits. I think it was from the tower that you see from the freeway further up. I lost it after I passed Bradshaw, then picked it up again near Mather Field exit. I also had some solid LTE while near Sunrise Mall yesterday afternoon. I did a bit of mapping and some speed tests on Sensorly when I wasn't driving.

 

Good times.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my contract is coming up for renewal in a few weeks. Before I go out and get a new phone (currently on iphone 5) I was hoping the Community could answer the following:

 

Are there sites transmitting LTE over band 26 and/or band 41 yet in the UCV Market?

 

Also, how soon "should" the UCV be SPARK ready?

 

Thanks in advance ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming they must still be testing and tweaking.  I noticed that the towers that I've been getting LTE from for the past couple of weeks are today only connecting 3G eHRPD.   The coloma tower is showing 3g, but speed tests were better than I've ever seen them on 3G.   I also had LTE for a brief moment on Monday morning on one of the rural sites north of auburn, but since then I've gotten 3G only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming they must still be testing and tweaking.  I noticed that the towers that I've been getting LTE from for the past couple of weeks are today only connecting 3G eHRPD.   The coloma tower is showing 3g, but speed tests were better than I've ever seen them on 3G.   I also had LTE for a brief moment on Monday morning on one of the rural sites north of auburn, but since then I've gotten 3G only.

That's my guess, too. It's in fits and starts, but it is still out there more often than not in certain parts of Rancho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...