Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/24/technology/mobile/tmobile-tech-company-of-year/?google_editors_picks

 

Thoughts on this? I don't think they deserved it. They aren't a technology company to me. Technology companies are companies like Google, Apple, Intel, and Qualcomm who are actively innovating and pushing the envelope. T-Mobile does not innovate, they only make use what technology companies have created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just saw a commercial of Tmobile claiming they have the only unlimited LTE plan... Well, that's clearly wrong. How can they claim that

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

Only unlimited LTE family plan, key word being family
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/24/technology/mobile/tmobile-tech-company-of-year/?google_editors_picks

 

Thoughts on this? I don't think they deserved it. They aren't a technology company to me. Technology companies are companies like Google, Apple, Intel, and Qualcomm who are actively innovating and pushing the envelope. T-Mobile does not innovate, they only make use what technology companies have created.

Talking about CNNMoney, if it was Fox Business, than I be concerned, but we are talking CNN here, only one worse is MSNBC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about the 2 for 100 family plan right now on sprint with unlimited everything?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Crapatalk

Was it out before tmobile had their plan, or was it in reaction to tmobile? That commercial has aired since the day they released the plan? Just curious, is sprints plan two lines only or more ate a discounted rate?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The plan changes may have affected many but obviously it didn't affect the vast majority of customers.

 

A majority is not the point.  For example, a majority of Sprint subs have been fine with the company, the network, the service, etc., during implementation of the Network Vision initiative.  But it is largely the unhappy, vocal minority that give Sprint its currently poor reputation.

 

In the poll for the TmoNews article, over 20 percent of the respondents have been unhappy with the forced plan changes.  That is a significant percentage.  Also, some of the commenters have reason to believe that T-Mobile employees/astroturfers have been intentionally skewing the poll results and comments in T-Mobile's favor.  If true, that could indicate the minority percentage is actually even greater.

 

In the end, why does this matter?  It shows that T-Mobile (and its "un-carrier" shtick) is not the greatest thing since sliced bread -- despite any marketing campaign or tech press celebration to the contrary.  And, about these plan changes, many T-Mobile users feel that John Legere lied to them -- the same charge that gets lobbed at Sprint regarding many things.  Now, personally, I have little sympathy for these affected users -- because most of them seem to be or have been on grossly inexpensive and/or perk laden "unlimited" data plans that are out of whack for the LTE smartphone era.  Regardless, this goes to show that the current Magenta cause célèbre still has a whole lot of users who feel wronged or dissatisfied.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/24/technology/mobile/tmobile-tech-company-of-year/?google_editors_picks

 

Thoughts on this? I don't think they deserved it. They aren't a technology company to me. Technology companies are companies like Google, Apple, Intel, and Qualcomm who are actively innovating and pushing the envelope. T-Mobile does not innovate, they only make use what technology companies have created.

100% agree on the classification that they aren't a tech company the same way MS, Google, Apple, and hardware/software companies are; however, they do play in the tech sector as a utility/services company, so I can see why they were picked by the editors.

 

I'm honking for Apple as a long-time shareholder & 30 year user, but Apple Pay is making NFC a BFD for retailers and banks. That's disruption. They'd get my vote...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agree on the classification that they aren't a tech company the same way MS, Google, Apple, and hardware/software companies are; however, they do play in the tech sector as a utility/services company, so I can see why they were picked by the editors.

 

I'm honking for Apple as a long-time shareholder & 30 year user, but Apple Pay is making NFC a BFD for retailers and banks. That's disruption. They'd get my vote...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Except Google already did NFC payments.... But as usual they didn't pressure retailers to adopt the technology. Even them there are a bunch of popular retailers who have disabled their NFC terminals because they're adopting CurrentC, which is a crappy solution.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except Google already did NFC payments.... But as usual they didn't pressure retailers to adopt the technology. Even them there are a bunch of popular retailers who have disabled their NFC terminals because they're adopting CurrentC, which is a crappy solution.

In classic Google fashion, they launched a feature without a plan to grow adoption beyond launch. After all, NFC payments aren't going to take off on grandma's free-with-contract phone... Apple had banks on board well before launch (I have friends at MasterCard who had NDAs in place for 18+ months). I'm not sure how Google prepared/launched NFC Payments...

 

(At least, I didn't see any banks sending out emails about loading up your Google Wallet with NFC Payment cards like I've seen with Citi, Bank of America, Chase, USAA, etc for Apple Pay. )

 

CurrentC is currently a ham-fisted solution at best, and the shareholders will ultimately decide if that impacts their bottom line. My guess is that eventually, you'll see retailers who cater to a tech-savvy crowd acquiesce. Others, like WalMart (the ringleader of CurrentC merchants) will resist. Time will tell!

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google Wallet's doing better than Apple Pay, even though carriers like T-Mobile push Isis/Softcard on most of their android devices. 

 

http://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-pay-responsible-for-1-percent-of-november-digital-payments-google-wallet-garners-4-percent/

Don't forget the amount of Google Wallet capable devices vs the amount of iPhone 6/6+ in the US. Google Wallet's been around for a 3+ years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5Ghz LTE? How much power will be required to make that work  :o

 

I use 5Ghz wifi at home for speed in most areas, but need 2.4Ghz to reach some parts of the house. Obviously a cell tower will have more power, but geez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5Ghz LTE? How much power will be required to make that work  :o

 

I use 5Ghz wifi at home for speed in most areas, but need 2.4Ghz to reach some parts of the house. Obviously a cell tower will have more power, but geez.

5GHz LTE would not be on the macro network. And it isn't designed to replace the licensed system on 700/AWS/PCS, but to supplement it with additional capacity through on-demand carrier aggregation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5Ghz LTE? How much power will be required to make that work  :o

 

I use 5Ghz wifi at home for speed in most areas, but need 2.4Ghz to reach some parts of the house. Obviously a cell tower will have more power, but geez.

 

A cell site could pump out a gigawatt transmission on the downlink, but that would not matter if it could not receive a milliwatt transmission on the uplink because of path loss.  The error in thinking is that the amount of transmitted power is the key.  Instead, the amount of received power is the issue.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In classic Google fashion, they launched a feature without a plan to grow adoption beyond launch. After all, NFC payments aren't going to take off on grandma's free-with-contract phone... Apple had banks on board well before launch (I have friends at MasterCard who had NDAs in place for 18+ months). I'm not sure how Google prepared/launched NFC Payments...

 

(At least, I didn't see any banks sending out emails about loading up your Google Wallet with NFC Payment cards like I've seen with Citi, Bank of America, Chase, USAA, etc for Apple Pay. )

 

Not this again.  Basically, you are insinuating that a mobile technology does not really matter until Apple embraces it and makes the hoi polloi feel they need it.  And you do not see this as a problem?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...