Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion


CriticalityEvent

Recommended Posts

I guess we can all say that duffess has made it easy for himself to be prosecuted for criminal trespass at a cell site by posting a video of it on YouTube. You are right about him deserving to get burned. Bad part about it is he is a ham radio operator who is to nosey for his own good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

NSFW... how not to do a cell site video. Dumbass deserved the RF burn. :lol:

What a douche. I love how he is freaking out about RRU's that are designed to be outdoors are in the weather. He has the sense of most of our trolls.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, to be clear, Sprint has a little over 39k CDMA sites (growing slightly on a monthly basis), not 38k.

 

I'm just a bit taken aback by the number of T-Mobile sites that will be sitting on AWS HSPA+ or worse for the foreseeable future. 14k sites...some of which are doubtless deployed for capacity and not just coverage. It's not immediately clear how many of those 14k still have H+, and aren't going LTE due to lack of AWS spectrum, and how many are EDGE or worse with no recourse.

If TMO upgrades its rural sites to "only" AWS HSPA+21, I'll consider that MISSION ACCOMPLISHED lol.

 

Does TMO really only have 10 MHz AWS and 10 MHz PCS in its most rural sites? I can't browse the FCC database right now but this site

 

http://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=99&p=1495

 

seems to indicate that TMO has at least 20 MHz of AWS everywhere, enough for HSPA+ and LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that MetroPCS was for the longest time (still is in some cases I think) 1x + LTE, not 1x + EvDo + LTE. They don't have much spectrum to work with.

Was MetroPCS leasing EvDo from Sprint/Verizon then?  They advertised it everywhere I saw them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the TMO-Metro slides (above couple posts), it says 60-65% of metro subs get net phone every year.

 

That means that each year, 35-40% don't so assuming a bunch of stuff, that means that after 2.5 years - when Legere said they're shutting down CDMA -there will be:

[.35, .4]^2.5 = [7.2, 10.1]% of Metro subs (as of June 2013) who will still be on a CDMA phone.

 

This assumes that TMO doesn't do anything, in terms of advertising, to push HSPA+ phones which is not the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else noticed that T-Mobile's upload speeds are relatively high? My Sprint upload speeds at it's highest are about 9Mbps, whereas I regularly see on T-Mobile upload speeds of 12Mbps on a 5x5 network.

 

Just wondering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone else noticed that T-Mobile's upload speeds are relatively high? My Sprint upload speeds at it's highest are about 9Mbps, whereas I regularly see on T-Mobile upload speeds of 12Mbps on a 5x5 network.

 

Just wondering.

TMO just launched LTE so not surprising. We'll see what a year of adding unlimited users does.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over on the Howard Forums I saw a link to this article posted:

 

http://www.wiwavelength.com/2013/07/a-taste-of-t-mobile-lte-bandwidth.html?m=1

 

by our very own AJ. And I guess it goes accordingly in this thread since it is about T-Mobile? 

 

I'm waiting anxiously on the Miami breakdown...

 

Good news.  We now have a publisher lined up.  And, like New York, Miami is one of the handful of markets that we decided worthy of a detailed dissection.

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Your direct link does not work.  But since I created the map that prompted the GigaOM article, I probably have copyright permission to submit a link to another copy:

 

http://i43.tinypic.com/muxv6w.png

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TMO just launched LTE so not surprising. We'll see what a year of adding unlimited users does.

With double the capacity and less customers than the other 3 I don't see unlimited data taking any effect on the speeds.

 

Sent from my T-Mobile LG Escape using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing I HATE about Tmobile: they won't show you on the map LTE vs HSPA+ vs 3G. They force you to zoom in ALL the way, click on a location and THEN they'll tell you what it is.

 

Everyone knows TMO's coverage sucks do why are they trying so hard to obfuscate it?

Edited by asdf190
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing I HATE about Tmobile: they won't show you on the map LTE vs HSPA+ vs 3G. They force you to zoom in ALL the way, click on a location and THEN they'll tell you what it is. Everyone knows TMO's coverage sucks do why are they trying so hard to obfuscate it?

 

All carriers do things like this.

 

Look at Sprint site, roaming/non-roaming colours are green and slightly less green.

This is done on purpose. They should use green for native and any other colour for roaming, not green.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All carriers do things like this.

 

Look at Sprint site, roaming/non-roaming colours are green and slightly less green.

This is done on purpose. They should use green for native and any other colour for roaming, not green.

At least they give you a color for LTE. TMO colors any 3G, HSPA+, LTE shades of green depending on signal strength.

 

Not the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least they give you a color for LTE. TMO colors any 3G, HSPA+, LTE shades of green depending on signal strength.

 

Not the same thing.

He didn't say they were the same thing. He said all carriers try to obfuscate something to their convenience and then he provided you an example of Sprint...

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing I HATE about Tmobile: they won't show you on the map LTE vs HSPA+ vs 3G. They force you to zoom in ALL the way, click on a location and THEN they'll tell you what it is.Everyone knows TMO's coverage sucks do why are they trying so hard to obfuscate it?

I agree it sucks they don't differentiate between HSPA+ and LTE.

 

However, about T-Mobile's coverage sucking, are you referring to the usual rural coverage they always get hammered on, or their urban? I ask because I'm always told by my friends with T-Mobile that they have excellent coverage throughout the city and although it's an incredibly small sample size, I have confirmed they have excellent signal and speeds in places I struggle to pull a simple text-based website on Sprint.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree it sucks they don't differentiate between HSPA+ and LTE.

 

However, about T-Mobile's coverage sucking, are you referring to the usual rural coverage they always get hammered on, or their urban? I ask because I'm always told by my friends with T-Mobile that they have excellent coverage throughout the city and although it's an incredibly small sample size, I have confirmed they have excellent signal and speeds in places I struggle to pull a simple text-based website on Sprint.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I don't have Tmobile (yet) but on this thread, AJ and some other people gave examples of in city coverage that TMO lacks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't say they were the same thing. He said all carriers try to obfuscate something to their convenience and then he provided you an example of Sprint...

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

I agree but my point is that TMO takes the obfuscation to a whole new level: it forces you to zoom in, all the way, and click on a point to learn if that point gets LTE.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree but my point is that TMO takes the obfuscation to a whole new level: it forces you to zoom in, all the way, and click on a point to learn if that point gets LTE.

 

Agree. It's incredibly annoying! Probably to be able to call 4G both HSPA+ and LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's still some remote cities where clicking pops up 3G, indicating it's below HSPA+21.

What does it take to go from H+: 7.2, 14.4, 21?

 

Is it a pure software update?

That usually has more to do with backhaul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's still some remote cities where clicking pops up 3G, indicating it's below HSPA+21.

What does it take to go from H+: 7.2, 14.4, 21?

 

Is it a pure software update?

 

You need the spectrum and the backhaul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...