Jump to content

Sprint says about one quarter behind on LTE target


Recommended Posts

Wasn't aware Sprint had coverage in Jamaica and Cuba.

 

Isaac.. No delays there. Maybe Laplace and Plaquemines Parish for a week or two. Flip over to another tower and come back to those.

 

The hurricane thing was just an excuse. And would have only been at the most a few days delay as crews got out of the way but I don't think they had started in the New Orleans market then anyways.

 

They still haven't started in Baton Rouge almost 2 months after the hurricane happened and to be honest it really wasn't that much of a hurricane event.

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

What about that weird derecho thing that hit DC a few months back? Could they be blaming it on that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait I thought it was the birds nesting in the towers causing delays....now its hurricanes. Lol

 

Still though they are doing fine all things considered. I remember long ago they were yapping about 2014-5 and then said LTE would be deployed by end of 2013 everywhere...so a qtr off ain't much with all things considered.

 

Dates on big projects move all the time...its the nature of forecasting the things and if ever spot on u should quit and play the lotto bc u have too much luck on ur side. Lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

When you say heart of the Midwest, you mean Kansas right? B)

 

That would be the heart of Sprint lol, everyone knows Ohio is the heart of the Midwest lol ;)

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE-LESS using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sandy has the potential to delay everything on the east coast. Already talking evacuation possibilities along the Chesapeake, Delmarva, Jersey Shore, and NYC areas.

 

(Not making excuses for Sprint here, just giving the forecast)

 

Is it still supposed to be just cat 1?

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it still supposed to be just cat 1?

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

It's not supposed to be a tropical system. It's going to be some sort of tropical/extratropical hybrid system. And "just a cat 1" completely underwhelms the magnitude of this thing. It is going to be much more expansive than a normal hurricane, pushing a lot more water onto the shore than normal, and it is interacting with another system in the mid-atlantic ocean that is will be cause a huge fetch of water to be pushed into the Northeast, combining with full moon astronomical high tides, and you get extraordinary coastal flooding. Then there's the possible foot of rain, and blizzard conditions possible over inland areas. This could be a Nor'Easter like none other.

 

Not to be an alarmist, there's still a lot to be pinned down, but it's very concerning.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be the heart of Sprint lol, everyone knows Ohio is the heart of the Midwest lol ;)

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE-LESS using Tapatalk 2

 

No no no. Everyone knows that Kansas is the heart of the Midwest. At least that's what they teach us in school. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No no no. Everyone knows that Kansas is the heart of the Midwest. At least that's what they teach us in school. :D

 

Tomato, tamoto? Lol as long as we get some LTE love

 

 

Sent from my EVO LTE-LESS using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not supposed to be a tropical system. It's going to be some sort of tropical/extratropical hybrid system. And "just a cat 1" completely underwhelms the magnitude of this thing. It is going to be much more expansive than a normal hurricane, pushing a lot more water onto the shore than normal, and it is interacting with another system in the mid-atlantic ocean that is will be cause a huge fetch of water to be pushed into the Northeast, combining with full moon astronomical high tides, and you get extraordinary coastal flooding. Then there's the possible foot of rain, and blizzard conditions possible over inland areas. This could be a Nor'Easter like none other.

 

Not to be an alarmist, there's still a lot to be pinned down, but it's very concerning.

 

Anything more than a Cat 3 and I'm not hanging out. Stayed outside most of the day when the Cat 3 was passing several years ago, watching shingles fly across the field was interesting.

 

I just repeat what the northerner's tell us, "why would you want to live close to the coast and in a flood area like that?" NYC should be fine, it's not like they are close to the coast or anything like that ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait I thought it was the birds nesting in the towers causing delays....now its hurricanes. Lol

 

 

No No, You are misinformed... Its not Birds, its ANGRY Birds!!! A New version rumored to be put out by a rival company where you shoot birds at sprint towers and try and knock the evil technicians off!!! This is what is REALLY slowing it down!

 

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

No No, You are misinformed... Its not Birds, its ANGRY Birds!!! A New version rumored to be put out by a rival company where you shoot birds at sprint towers and try and knock the evil technicians off!!! This is what is REALLY slowing it down!

 

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

 

Hmm... How about shoot the birds but not knock the techs off? If you don't get the birds fast enough the birds attack the techs. That would be an awesome game!

 

Sent from my C64 w/Epyx FastLoad cartridge

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Anything more than a Cat 3 and I'm not hanging out. Stayed outside most of the day when the Cat 3 was passing several years ago, watching shingles fly across the field was interesting.

 

I just repeat what the northerner's tell us, "why would you want to live close to the coast and in a flood area like that?" NYC should be fine, it's not like they are close to the coast or anything like that ;)

 

Lol... Esp the flood area part... Too much water up there and the financial district is a gonner. Lol

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
This makes me sad, means I likely won't see LTE until 2015. :(

 

This thread discusses a one quarter delay, not one year.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't the plan to have 12,000 sites completed this year? There's only 34 days left this year and you need to factor Christmas into that. I don't see how that number is possible.

its not going to happen and that is why as said in this thread that they are a quarter behind which is about 3 months I bealve
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wasn't the plan to have 12,000 sites completed this year? There's only 34 days left this year and you need to factor Christmas into that. I don't see how that number is possible.

 

Definitely not going to happen.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not going to happen and that is why as said in this thread that they are a quarter behind which is about 3 months I bealve

 

I was pointing out that the math doesn't really add up for just a quarter behind. At the current rates of deployment, it seems like they are more than 3 months behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well! The way i look at it, theres still a "great unknown outcome" to the softbank investment. I would expect all plans to go into hyperdrive once Son is officially sitting at the table. Is money the key to a faster deployment? Not necessarily, but I fail to believe he will be satisfied with the status quo of the old cash strapped sprint

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was pointing out that the math doesn't really add up for just a quarter behind. At the current rates of deployment, it seems like they are more than 3 months behind.

It does in a way, but theres markets that have not started yet as far as we know and some have been delayed like the michagain market,Minnesota thats now having sites accepted, some seconed round markets havent even started yet or alteast haven't had sites accepted from sprint. I think that sprint had that number a little high, but if all the markets would have started on time i could see it being around that number
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The number of sites accepted only tells part of the story. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of sites that work is currently under way.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
    • I wouldn’t be shocked if it’s Verizon, too. In my area they have multiple nodes on the same block as full macro sites with mmWave, in direct line of sight. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...