Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Michigan Market (Detroit/Flint/Ann Arbor/Tri-Cities)


ReyBanz

Recommended Posts

I found some LTE 800 near Novi/Farmington Hills area. Same spot I found 1x800 late last year.

 

glad ur getting updates but hate the 3mhz in the Columbus market, Better than 3G sometimes but nice to see lte stick and not doing the 3G/lte dance and burning your battery!!!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow that's awfully close to the Canadian border...

I wish people would stop pointing this out. There's 1x800 in Detroit, which is basically ON the border. I have seen at least 6 or 7 1x800 sites there, mostly right downtown.

 

Novi is 30 miles from the border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish people would stop pointing this out. There's 1x800 in Detroit, which is basically ON the border. I have seen at least 6 or 7 1x800 sites there, mostly right downtown.

 

Novi is 30 miles from the border.

 

25 miles may be the limit given other documents (very low power after this iirc).  However these may also be privately negotiated.

Edited by dkyeager
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's here less that one mile right now.

 

Sorry for being unclear.  I was referencing B26 LTE 800 site locations.  Extensive small cells are likely your consolation prize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 miles refers to the distance to the Canadian shore, which I assume includes islands. 1x800 frequencies are divided up into primary and secondary for each country iirc.

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 miles refers to the distance to the Canadian shore, which I assume includes islands. 1x800 frequencies are divided up into primary and secondary for each country iirc.

 

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

Right, but from Detroit downtown, it's less than a mile across the water to Canada.

 

I don't see how CDMA compared to LTE really makes a difference. They are both considered wide band radio signals. The problem with the whole border thing is that Canada was still using it for iDEN radio, which is narrow band and channelized. If something on the US side was looking to use that spectrum for similar narrow band signaling, even if not iDEN, is there would not be much of an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll go even further. Southern California needs band 26 BAD. But I've lost all hope at this point

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, but things aren't worked out with Mexico. But they are with Canada. So I'm looking forward to some B26 goodness.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but things aren't worked out with Mexico. But they are with Canada. So I'm looking forward to some B26 goodness.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

 

I'm praying the file a waiver for socal like they did with Phoenix AZ. This holdup is ridiculous granted it's not their fault.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ohio and Michigan have an advantage since the are primary overall in diplomatic agreements concerning these frequencies, where Vancouver (3rd largest Canadian metro) is primary near Seattle. (Primary meaning they got more frequencies slots in this band.) Details were posted in our 800 thread, likely during the last year. Other unknown factors may also be at play.


Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correction to above, the distance is 30km ( about 18.7 miles) from the nearest Canadian shore.  http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5107-lte-800-band-26-sites-accepted-discussion/page-169

 

The frequency distribution was as follows: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5107-lte-800-band-26-sites-accepted-discussion/page-169&do=findComment&comment=496513 Continue down for several more posts.  I still believe some private agreements/ arrangements are also likely.  These links and my views are not meant to be definitive but merely enlightening.  Read through them and then put forth what you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talked to Executive Services at Sprint last week.   Scheduled for 800 LTE love, during Late April / May timeframe: Dearborn Michigan and Westland areas.   My hope is  for Northern Burbs, like Oakland County / Rochester / Auburn Hills  to receive some 800 LTE antenna attention.

Edited by dro1984
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Sprint can upgrade some of those B25 only towers soon. There is one that really annoys me and would really help if Sprint could deploy B41 and B26 on that tower. Not sure how I can check the status or push for an upgrade on that tower. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most towers in Metro Detroit need this upgrade.   Since IBEZ has been clear and open in this area now for sometime,(a year or so according to the FCC)  it once again becomes a waiting game with Sprint.    It's especially annoying when they keep advertising Detroit as a Sprint Spark or what ever the name is now.   To be that, all 3 frequencies should have been available and up until now, haven't.    IE little or no 800mHz east of Jackson Michigan. 

When I was on the phone, the gentleman from Sprint Executive Services was literally telling me when the last Tower work / update was done in the area.  We went through several.   Most if not all, have not been touched in this area since 2013/14 (Network Vision?)   that was 3 or 4 years ago. By electronic / computer age, that was an eternity ago.    There were only a handful that had some recent updates.

 

He did say and I will tell all of you this, USE YOUR Sprint Zone app and report network issues!   Report Network issues on that app!  They are actually downloading and utilizing that data to determine what tower and locations needs to be scheduled/ worked.    If they get no complaints, they assume no issue. They can see at that moment, your GPS location, the type of phone in use and network / tower numbers/load etc.    Hope that helps.    I too am waiting.   Small cell deployment at Comerica Park and Ford Field is great, but I don't live there.    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They don't advertise Sprint Spark or anything like that anymore. Just LTE Plus, which is B41 Carrier Aggregation, and they show those areas specifically on their coverage map. You'll get your B26, but don't worry about Spark. That was a marketing blunder. And it's as relevant as iDEN now.

 

Using Tapatalk on Note 8.0

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I was a handful of miles into Windsor this morning and was wondering why my phone hadn't kicked over to Rogers. I was surprised to see I was still on Sprint. In the past, my phone immediately kicked over once I emerged on the Canadian side of the tunnel.

 

Screenshot_2017-05-11-07-20-26.pngScreenshot_2017-05-11-07-26-36.pngScreenshot_2017-05-11-07-21-12.png

 

There was a brief flicker of Sprint Band 25 LTE but it dropped before I could snap a screenshot.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just for fun and out of scope for this topic, here's some screenshots of Rogers Wireless LTE in Windsor before I was off into HSPA+ land.

 

Screenshot_2017-05-11-07-32-46.png Screenshot_2017-05-11-07-33-11.png

 

Screenshot_2017-05-11-07-39-17.pngScreenshot_2017-05-11-07-39-09.png

 

Screenshot_2017-05-11-16-16-30.pngScreenshot_2017-05-11-16-16-24.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE 800 in Birmingham, MI (48009) yesterday.  GCI 08C0510F PCI 411 TAC 17943 EARFCN 8763 MCC-MNC 310-120

 

Held CDMA 800 all the way from Southfield to Auburn Hills on a call 3 days ago.  Somehow held onto a single site/sector for over 10 miles.  Finally dropped under a bridge at Opdyke and South Blvd.

 

SCP now has 19 CDMA 800 sites logged.

 

Saw new dual band antenna hardware being installed on the Sprint rack of a cell site along I696 a week ago in Southfield.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anymore local 800 sightings?     I'm still waiting for the Dearborn (Greenfield Road Tower and Telegraph Road Tower) upgrades that were promised "by end of May" per Sprint....

Edited by dro1984
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...