Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)


S4GRU

Recommended Posts

I noticed this site wasn't gmo, has it had new panels for a while? I hadn't noticed them until today.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Yeah, it was full build and accepted about 5-6 months ago.  I had a friend email me the day they were working on it.  It's the only LA site that is not GMO, though.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally getting LTE on the west side of town. Speeds are bad, but is enough to use.

I noticed it was on the day before yesterday and it had high speeds just a quarter mile from the tower and now it's slowed and have connection issues
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally getting LTE on the west side of town. Speeds are bad, but is enough to use.

I see that you are not a sponsor of the site. If you were, there is another ABQ market thread that has every site and the ones that are getting updated. In addition, Robert posts updates for what sites have been LTE accepted. He confirmed there have been 5 sites confirmed this past week. I believe there will be 4 in addition to those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that many now believe 4Mbps is bad. That's what WiMax averaged during its peak. And we all would have done nearly anything to get WiMax all around ABQ.

 

VZW was down below 1Mbps at heavy use LTE sites before adding Band 4. VZW was really bad in Farmington. Until all the sites in ABQ are live, all Sprint LTE sites will be heavily used.

 

And Sprint advertises 5-8Mbps LTE speeds. So if that's not fast enough for you, you may need to switch.

 

*sigh*

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that many now believe 4Mbps is bad. That's what WiMax averaged during its peak. And we all would have done nearly anything to get WiMax all around ABQ.

 

VZW was down below 1Mbps at heavy use LTE sites before adding Band 4. VZW was really bad in Farmington. Until all the sites in ABQ are live, all Sprint LTE sites will be heavily used.

 

And Sprint advertises 5-8Mbps LTE speeds. So if that's not fast enough for you, you may need to switch.

 

*sigh*

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I agree completely. I do notice he is in the west sir and that may be one of the new towers I found this morning. It could be all alone like you allude to you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I got another text from Sprint yesterday that said: "We're continuing to make network upgrades in your area. See how this affects your service at: sprint.us/networkupdate3" The website that it sends you to says:

"Network Update

In the next few days we will be updating one of the towers you use most. This construction may cause temprary service disprtions. We are working to ensure the udpates are made quickly to minimize any inconvenience to you. Visit sprint.com/network for information about network improvements."

Anyone else get this text? AFAIK the two towers nearest to me are the one on San Pedro south of Paseo and the one by the Del Norte Plaza on San Antonio and Wyoming and neither had been upgraded yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I got another text from Sprint yesterday that said: "We're continuing to make network upgrades in your area. See how this affects your service at: sprint.us/networkupdate3" The website that it sends you to says:

"Network Update

In the next few days we will be updating one of the towers you use most. This construction may cause temprary service disprtions. We are working to ensure the udpates are made quickly to minimize any inconvenience to you. Visit sprint.com/network for information about network improvements."

Anyone else get this text? AFAIK the two towers nearest to me are the one on San Pedro south of Paseo and the one by the Del Norte Plaza on San Antonio and Wyoming and neither had been upgraded yet.

I got that text days before my nearest tower was upgraded to LTE.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I got another text from Sprint yesterday that said: "We're continuing to make network upgrades in your area. See how this affects your service at: sprint.us/networkupdate3" The website that it sends you to says:

"Network Update

In the next few days we will be updating one of the towers you use most. This construction may cause temprary service disprtions. We are working to ensure the udpates are made quickly to minimize any inconvenience to you. Visit sprint.com/network for information about network improvements."

Anyone else get this text? AFAIK the two towers nearest to me are the one on San Pedro south of Paseo and the one by the Del Norte Plaza on San Antonio and Wyoming and neither had been upgraded yet.

Both do those towers has permits issued in May 20ish. I have a feeling that those are going to be done soon.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, Sprint in Albuquerque is pretty damned good, now. Has Albuquerque even been officially launched here? I'm having some disruption (3G/4G/zilch G) but that's because of the work being done. I remember when getting 1+ downloads was freakishly good. Let's be happy, Sprint people.... we have good service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, Sprint in Albuquerque is pretty damned good, now. Has Albuquerque even been officially launched here? I'm having some disruption (3G/4G/zilch G) but that's because of the work being done. I remember when getting 1+ downloads was freakishly good. Let's be happy, Sprint people.... we have good service.

 

 Not launched yet.  I think it is getting close.  If they get another 3-5 sites with LTE live by the time they do they next round, they may be willing to call ABQ launched.  I'm actually surprised that no Santa Fe or Farmington sites have gone live yet.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, Sprint in Albuquerque is pretty damned good, now. Has Albuquerque even been officially launched here? I'm having some disruption (3G/4G/zilch G) but that's because of the work being done. I remember when getting 1+ downloads was freakishly good. Let's be happy, Sprint people.... we have good service.

Indeed!

 

 Not launched yet.  I think it is getting close.  If they get another 3-5 sites with LTE live by the time they do they next round, they may be willing to call ABQ launched.  I'm actually surprised that no Santa Fe or Farmington sites have gone live yet.

 

Robert

I would say we would be on the next round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. Still work to be done in far ne, se and rio rancho. I've said it in the sponsor forums. 3-4 in rr and 9-10 in abq.

 

Tmo launched ABQ LTE just covering I-40 from Coors to Tramway, I-25 from San Mateo/Osuna to the Airport, and a couple of sites in the NE.  No South Valley, No North Valley, No NE Heights, No West Mesa except near I-40, No Rio Rancho or Bernalillo.  I mapped it all at the time.

 

Sprint already has more LTE coverage than Tmo did when Tmo launched.  We are getting close.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw CL working on the site. They put in the white box. Didn't get a chance to talk to the guy. It's progress. So does mean all we are waiting on is the fiber box and intagration team?

 

 

IMG_20140820_131022.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed that in the morning I can get decent speeds 2-3 mbps and then the speeds diminish down to .36 mbps. Hoping that they are still working on this issue because it's nice to see 4g but if you can't use it, it is kind of pointless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed that in the morning I can get decent speeds 2-3 mbps and then the speeds diminish down to .36 mbps. Hoping that they are still working on this issue because it's nice to see 4g but if you can't use it, it is kind of pointless.

I agree. To Robert's point earlier about the TMO rollout, they eventually did cover the rest of the area and comparing their current download performance on sensorly to Sprint's, there is far less yellow and red on T Mobiles results. I do hope and have to believe this will eventually get better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed that in the morning I can get decent speeds 2-3 mbps and then the speeds diminish down to .36 mbps. Hoping that they are still working on this issue because it's nice to see 4g but if you can't use it, it is kind of pointless.

They need more sites up. They are working on it. Not all sites/sectors are overloaded.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need more sites up. They are working on it. Not all sites/sectors are overloaded.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

This site is a monopole type setup also, maybe that will have an affect on performance?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This site is a monopole type setup also, maybe that will have an affect on performance?

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but even if the site has ground mounted rru's, which is the case for most monopoles, it won't affect the theoretical max throughput of the site.  Ground mounted sites only suffer from lower signals at the boundaries of coverage (in general) in comparison to tower mounted rru's.  You are likely seeing a speed drop due only to tower load.  The demand on the tower changes during different times of the day and will affect your speed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but even if the site has ground mounted rru's, which is the case for most monopoles, it won't affect the theoretical max throughput of the site. Ground mounted sites only suffer from lower signals at the boundaries of coverage (in general) in comparison to tower mounted rru's. You are likely seeing a speed drop due only to tower load. The demand on the tower changes during different times of the day and will affect your speed.

Most monopoles actually have RRU's up top still. At least nationally. However, the rest of your logic is spot on. A ground mount LTE site does not run slower. The signal distance will be reduced between 1% and 20% depending on the length of the run from radios to antenna.

 

The radio loss from a 50' monopole with RRU's at the base is very small. The radio loss on a 300'+ boomer with the radios 100' from the tower base is approx. 20%. Given that most of the monopoles in ABQ are 50' to 100' with the RRU's very proximate to the tower base, this is not really an issue.

 

In a city where deployment is going on and a lot of sites still missing is going to have a sector here or there that are way overburdened. AT&T is deploying LTE here and it happens all the time. I sometimes have to turn off LTE on some sectors.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4788ea7d3dc79cf1bdd4a6c88f04800b.jpg

this morning, near Blake's on Unser and Wexford in RR

Not shabby speed and ping since you have almost no signal at all. :tu:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...