Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - New Orleans Market


Slimboutit

Recommended Posts

is there a tutorial for sensorly? I don't quite understand the correlation between signal strength and throughput.

 

I was at Sherwood and coursey last night. 2 speed tests, both less than 1m down, AGAIN.

 

serving cell - 419

rsrp - 119

 

so that's 6 sites I've tested in a week that are getting less than 1m down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's what I don't understand about sensorly. it shows a decent signal strength right at walkon's, where I was at.

 

also, I was at millerville and the interstate (south side) getting 3g when sensorly shows that area is lte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's what I don't understand about sensorly. it shows a decent signal strength right at walkon's, where I was at.

 

also, I was at millerville and the interstate (south side) getting 3g when sensorly shows that area is lte.

 

Make sure you are on the Sprint 4G map and stick to the two darkest purple shades as strong signals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Closing out the year... 

 

In Progress    3
Legacy    27

Decommissioned    2

3G    8
3G/4G    177
3G/800    1 (800mhz blocked)
3G/800/4G    14 (800mhz blocked)
4G    114
 

Completion Estimates based on December 2013 install/upgrade rates:

RRU Install    6/13/2014
3G Accepted    6/6/2053
4G Accepted    8/24/2014
1x800 Accepted    10/23/2103

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at a site that had "3 bars" according to the sensorly signal strength.

 

I'm still looking for an answer the question of how sensorly signal strength correlates to data throughput. I see decent speeds around town on the maps but, when I run speedtests, I'm getting less than 1m down almost every time on a brand new gs4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at a site that had "3 bars" according to the sensorly signal strength.

 

I'm still looking for an answer the question of how sensorly signal strength correlates to data throughput. I see decent speeds around town on the maps but, when I run speedtests, I'm getting less than 1m down almost every time on a brand new gs4.

I would go by your own signal strength and not Sensorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I am posting this in the New Orleans market...but...maybe you guys can answer a question I have.  I was reading back in your posts about WiMax and it got me thinking.  Where I live there is one protection site that was added which sits in the middle of town and has been avoided with NV upgrades, is this because it has the WiMax equipment?  And will the Sprint Spark sites get 1900 LTE as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I am posting this in the New Orleans market...but...maybe you guys can answer a question I have. I was reading back in your posts about WiMax and it got me thinking. Where I live there is one protection site that was added which sits in the middle of town and has been avoided with NV upgrades, is this because it has the WiMax equipment? And will the Sprint Spark sites get 1900 LTE as well?

I doubt that is the reason it was skipped. No idea on the 2.6 question as the site spacing really isn't there for us on 1.9 sites. Since work has almost stopped in the market in the past few months we are still looking at the 1.9 LTE rollout and hoping the 1x800 rollout starts soon. 2.6 just seems to far off to worry about at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt that is the reason it was skipped. No idea on the 2.6 question as the site spacing really isn't there for us on 1.9 sites. Since work has almost stopped in the market in the past few months we are still looking at the 1.9 LTE rollout and hoping the 1x800 rollout starts soon. 2.6 just seems to far off to worry about at this point.

Hmm...wonder why it was skipped.  The WiMax site is co-located with Sprint's 1x and 3G EVDO equipment, curious if they would NV this site and add 1900 LTE tor wait until contractors install Spark equipment.  One thing I notice about Ericsson around here anyway, they seem to avoid the sites that cover downtown districts.  If you look at the Nashville market map, preferably Johnson City, Kingsport, and Bristol you can see where sites are missing from the NV sites completed.  Have you seen this down your way, since Ericsson is your vendor as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm...wonder why it was skipped. The WiMax site is co-located with Sprint's 1x and 3G EVDO equipment, curious if they would NV this site and add 1900 LTE tor wait until contractors install Spark equipment. One thing I notice about Ericsson around here anyway, they seem to avoid the sites that cover downtown districts. If you look at the Nashville market map, preferably Johnson City, Kingsport, and Bristol you can see where sites are missing from the NV sites completed. Have you seen this down your way, since Ericsson is your vendor as well?

Absolutely, the downtown area is the least worked on and most sparse NV area in the market. At least this is true for New Orleans. I think the Baton Rouge crew would agree also.

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone tell me why work here has slowed down so much?

No one knows. I am guessing there was some subcontractor firings or personnel relocations going on due to the rather abrupt change in work pace. All I can find are VZW and AT&T crews building new sites or doing their 2nd LTE rollout around town lately. Been many months since I have seen a work crew for Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one knows. I am guessing there was some subcontractor firings or personnel relocations going on due to the rather abrupt change in work pace. All I can find are VZW and AT&T crews building new sites or doing their 2nd LTE rollout around town lately. Been many months since I have seen a work crew for Sprint.

Do you think work will pick back up and get back to normal?

Edited by teamgs3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think work will pick back up and get back to normal?

 

I did spot some workers at a tower near my home a couple days ago. It is the first activity at a known Sprint site in a long time.

 

So maybe a crew is sniffing around doing something. Maybe not. We shall see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They wont. I live by a protection site co-located with sprint 4g lte only and they left wimax un touched.

Hmm...wonder why it was skipped. The WiMax site is co-located with Sprint's 1x and 3G EVDO equipment, curious if they would NV this site and add 1900 LTE tor wait until contractors install Spark equipment. One thing I notice about Ericsson around here anyway, they seem to avoid the sites that cover downtown districts. If you look at the Nashville market map, preferably Johnson City, Kingsport, and Bristol you can see where sites are missing from the NV sites completed. Have you seen this down your way, since Ericsson is your vendor as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely, the downtown area is the least worked on and most sparse NV area in the market. At least this is true for New Orleans. I think the Baton Rouge crew would agree also.

 

 

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

On the fixed wireline broadband side of the house, there are many FCC initiatives for providers to start with rural areas, it turns into priority deployments, I wonder if it is the same on the wireless side. Here in NC, I noted that a drive through the country yielded LTE service, where some of the higher population areas barely had 3G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Status update for the New Orleans market January 2014:

 

Known RRU/Cabinet installs: 1

4G acceptances: 3

3G acceptances (adds to existing 4G only sites): 17

1x800 acceptances: 0

 

Completion Estimations based on Jan-2014 completion rates:

RRU Install - 4/17/2016
3G Accepted - 9/20/2014
4G Accepted - 2/8/2015
1x800 Accepted - 3/1/2104

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know why it seems like 3g is getting more work than lte right now, shouldn't have 3g been like that in the beginning?

Just the way Ericsson does things. Do the 4g one day, come back later and do the 3g another, then roll back and do the 800 stuff later.

 

Better than nothing as we haven't really seen them installing new cabinets or other upgrades of legacy. They have quite a few 4g only sites to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Status update for the New Orleans market Feb 2014:

Known RRU/Cabinet installs: 1
4G acceptances: 3
3G acceptances (majority are adds to existing 4G only sites): 41
1x800 acceptances: 0

Completion Estimations based on Feb-2014 completion rates:

RRUs Installed - 1/30/2016
3G Accepted - 4/28/2014
4G Accepted - 1/3/2015
1x800 Accepted - 7/7/2104
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Anyone having issues with LTE? I work out in belle chasse and it does not connect anymore near Engineers Road. I also carpool to work and on the way to work I noticed I was not getting any LTE on the I-10 to New Orleans.  I called Sprint yesterday and she mentioned they were upgrading towers in my area, but I  am sure it can't be every tower.  Even did a hard reset and still having LTE trouble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...