Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - San Diego Market


ferhusky

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

1st time posting, long time viewer.

 

I feel there has been a more stable connection at my office, (Kearny Mesa off 163 between Balboa and Clairemont Mesa Blvd) throughout the day. Hopefully the LTE switch will happen soon, I (like many San Diegans) have been waiting for beyond 3G speeds since WiMax was introduced and nothing for almost 3 years now.

 

Are there any further updates to the San Diego market?

 

Couple more in progress sites is added weekly. It's starting slow but it's steady progress at least. Additional info is in the sponsor area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've recently received 25 more In Progress sites to add for the San Diego market. I will do that the next time I get a chance. Out to dinner with the family tonight.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've recently received 25 more In Progress sites to add for the San Diego market. I will do that the next time I get a chance. Out to dinner with the family tonight.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Robert, when a site has been accepted does that mean LTE is coming to those sites soon?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert, when a site has been accepted does that mean LTE is coming to those sites soon?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Not sure what you're asking...

 

If a site is accepted for 4G, the LTE could be active immediately or be blocked for testing. If the market is launched, it will have a better chance of not being blocked, but most sites go live and accept connections right off the bat.

 

If a site is accepted for 3G only, it has to be upgraded and accepted for 4G before you will likely see LTE coming from it.

 

Sprint accepts the completed work. They don't accept the site for work to start on it.

 

Does that answer your question?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was there a major delay because of permit issues? Have seen many permits for last month but nothing much for Jan. Anyone know how to look up info that is useful? https://publicservices.sdcounty.ca.gov/CitizenAccess/ Would be nice if someone can put something together for San Diego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delays? They had 30 sites completed last week. That's pretty impressive.

 

Don't forget that San Diego is an Alcatel Lucent market. AlcaLu tends to only bring online the 3G side of a completed NV site in the beginning of deployment. Around 3-6 months of work, they start to bring up the LTE side of completed sites. It's just the way they roll.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3G unusually bad in Del Mar today (15th St & Camino Del Mar). Haven't seen speeds like this in a long time. At least where I work, the WiFi has improved, so data isn't much of an issue (for me anyways) plus our cold weather has gone away. It's a beautiful and 66° esupy5uq.jpgpymymaqy.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3G unusually bad in Del Mar today (15th St & Camino Del Mar). Haven't seen speeds like this in a long time. At least where I work, the WiFi has improved, so data isn't much of an issue (for me anyways) plus our cold weather has gone away. It's a beautiful and 66° pymymaqy.jpg

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

If I had a view like that... I'm not sure I would even bother looking at my phone! Lol

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard it gets worse before it gets better when they are working on NV?

 

Just tested mine - Not too bad in El Cajon... Capacity is a huge issue where I am, so I'll watch the tests later in the day to see the variance. (NV has not started on any of the towers near me that I can tell)

 

Screenshot_2013-01-17-11-25-50_zps990c3f25.png

 

here is one off topic

64916101524373343201371_zpsb115bf78.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, as much as I want 4G here in San Diego, I don't mind them getting the 3G upgraded first. As of now 3G seems to do better when comes to streaming video like Netflix at high rates of speed while in the car (sitting as a passenger of course).

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hold on to your panties everyone! LTE was spotted for a short while this past Saturday in Eastlake, right near Albertsons off of East H Street/Proctor Valley Rd and Mt Miguel Rd with an iPhone 5.

 

Sensorly capture or it didn't happen!

 

Just kidding, I believe you. But I'd love to see some purple on that map. For anyone that has no idea what I'm talking about, check out this map: http://www.sensorly.com/map/4G/US/USA/Sprint/lte_310sprint#q=san diego, ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know exactly where that is. On my next day off which wouldn't be until the weekend at the earliest, I'll try to capture that on Sensorly, unless somebody from the South Bay is reading this and able to get to it before I can. Unfortunately from what I understand, Sensorly can't upload information about the status of 3G/4G networks from the iPhone.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd been having many data and voice problems over the weekend and was on the phone with Sprint yesterday and again this morning. Not that the CS reps have correct info all the time but the person I spoke with at Sprint made a very interesting comment to the effect that LTE was supposed to be lit up on February 1 in San Diego. I hope he was right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the San Diego interactive map, the closest tower to that location is *edited.

Edited by Dkoellerwx
Please keep sponsor info, such as site IDs and specific address, inside of the sponsor forums.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody just posted over on Sprint's forums that they are getting LTE in the Carmel Mtn area.

 

That's where I live. Unfortunately I work in the Kearny Mesa area where 3g has somewhat improved over the past few days. Hopefully I'll see some LTE when I get back home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody just posted over on Sprint's forums that they are getting LTE in the Carmel Mtn area.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Got a link for that? I'm curious to know where in Carmel Mountain it is. I live in Scripps Ranch, so it's only 10 minutes away

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...