Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Oklahoma Market


Serious

Recommended Posts

looks like the cell site near my place in Yukon (SW 15th and Mustang Rd) has NV equipment now and is broadcasting LTE

 

I live off Czech Hall and Reno (walking distance to the 711 on the corner) and switching to Sprint (just waiting on the phones to arrive), do you believe the LTE signal would reach this way? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live off Czech Hall and Reno (walking distance to the 711 on the corner) and switching to Sprint (just waiting on the phones to arrive), do you believe the LTE signal would reach this way?

You shouldn't have any problem there. Be sure to install sensorly when you get your phones. Except for right around 40, Yukon hasn't really been mapped much

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You shouldn't have any problem there. Be sure to install sensorly when you get your phones. Except for right around 40, Yukon hasn't really been mapped much

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without trying to sound like an idiot what is sensory?

I currently get 25-30Mbps down on Verizon but I just cannot deal with the capped data, then again what good is unlimited data if you cannot use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sensorly maps signals and is user based so in areas that users of the app a have mapped, it is way more accurate than the maps provided by the carriers. IT actually shows you were people have gotten signals at. Below is a screenshot from Sensorly showing Midwest City.  The purple is where others and I have mapped Sprints LTE signal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

mwc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.  One dual band Network Vision panel per sector is enough in nearly all cases.  Only if the number of CDMA1X/EV-DO/LTE carriers exceeds the output capacity of the panel does a sector require a second panel alongside the first.

 

Thus, any additional panels that go up in the next few years will typically be for subsequent bands, such as BRS/EBS 2600 MHz, PCS/AWS-2 1900 MHz, etc.  Sprint is well positioned to take on additional bands, if necessary, for native or hosted network coverage.  The other big three operators are hamstrung by frequently full racks that will require swapping out panels to make room.

 

AJ

Sloppiest install I see around town always ends up being Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live off Czech Hall and Reno (walking distance to the 711 on the corner) and switching to Sprint (just waiting on the phones to arrive), do you believe the LTE signal would reach this way? 

I heard it reported that the SW 15th tower near Mustang road is active LTE so that should be good for you.  My GF's brother lives in your vicinity near SW 4th & Czech Hall Rd., I'll have to drive over that way and check it out. 

 

Sensorly maps signals and is user based so in areas that users of the app a have mapped, it is way more accurate than the maps provided by the carriers. IT actually shows you were people have gotten signals at. Below is a screenshot from Sensorly showing Midwest City.  The purple is where others and I have mapped Sprints LTE signal.

 

 

 

 

 

 

mwc.jpg

But you're map is missing the most important part of MWC!  ;)

 

So is the SE 44th & Sooner Rd tower doing you any good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without trying to sound like an idiot what is sensory?

I currently get 25-30Mbps down on Verizon but I just cannot deal with the capped data, then again what good is unlimited data if you cannot use it.

You will not get that on Sprint of course, even at NV completion. Probably 7-14 in Okc will be the norm for a while. This also depends on your signal values etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard it reported that the SW 15th tower near Mustang road is active LTE so that should be good for you.  My GF's brother lives in your vicinity near SW 4th & Czech Hall Rd., I'll have to drive over that way and check it out. 

 

But you're map is missing the most important part of MWC!  ;)

 

So is the SE 44th & Sooner Rd tower doing you any good?

 I avoid the SE 44th & Sooner area as much as possible(MIL lives there) so not sure how good it is. My kids have mapped it when going to grandmas but they didn't do any speed test. Next time I will make sure you house is in the map lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else having issues today connecting to data?  Had the problem regardless of where I have went so far today in Midwest City and switched between 4 different towers.  Thought it was just me until a buddy of mine in Norman called and said having same issue. Voice is working normal just data giving issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else having issues today connecting to data? Had the problem regardless of where I have went so far today in Midwest City and switched between 4 different towers. Thought it was just me until a buddy of mine in Norman called and said having same issue. Voice is working normal just data giving issues.

had issues here in Kansas but has since been resolved

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Working again here but speed is all over the place. Some am getting half of 3G speeds. Problem was only 4G. 3G workef fine.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Working again here but speed is all over the place. Some am getting half of 3G speeds. Problem was only 4G. 3G workef fine.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

sounds like here

 

Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a new serving cell showing up in south Tulsa (159) that is giving me better speeds (3~4 mbps) but signal strength is still low indoors at -110dbm. I wonder which site got updated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The site at 81st and Harvard is now in progress, the new antennas and rrus are visible. There is still a line attached to the rack.

 

As of now all sites around me have NV equipment (although I wish more of them would broadcast lte)

 

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best I could do with a cell phone, but notice the 4 RRUs behind all the new antennas:

 

5c4gwKe.jpg

 

I'm not fully versed on how Sprint is doing these sites, but I was under the assumption that all the antennas would be replaced. They added new ones with RRUs, but left what appears to be the legacy ones on the Sprint rack as well (top rack is Nextel, I'm not talking about those). Do they come back later and hook up the old antennas to the new equipment, or how does that work? 

 

By the way, I have been getting 4G from my building on Chesapeake campus for a few days.  Speed test this morning was 7080 kbps down, 4089 kbps up with a 264 ping.

 

I think my building might be on the northern edge of the signal though since I do not get it when I am on 63rd and Classen.  I have not driven south to do a map on sensorly because of traffic around campus.  Maybe on the way home today.  I am responsible for the dot on Sensorly near NW 62nd and Classen.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else having issues today connecting to data?  Had the problem regardless of where I have went so far today in Midwest City and switched between 4 different towers.  Thought it was just me until a buddy of mine in Norman called and said having same issue. Voice is working normal just data giving issues.

 

From now till September we will have intermittent network "errors" in the sense that the NV complete towers are now strained due to lack of 4G signals coming from adjacent cells.  If MR. :dazed:  would pay the local telcos to turn on the fiber connection these sites would already be live. The fiber is there at the site.  :coffee:

 

The site at 81st and Harvard is now in progress, the new antennas and rrus are visible. There is still a line attached to the rack.

 

As of now all sites around me have NV equipment (although I wish more of them would broadcast lte)

 

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Tapatalk 2

 And now you will be closed in from every side as 111 & Yale is live & 97 Memorial site was "in progress" Saturday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From now till September we will have intermittent network "errors" in the sense that the NV complete towers are now strained due to lack of 4G signals coming from adjacent cells.  If MR. :dazed:  would pay the local telcos to turn on the fiber connection these sites would already be live. The fiber is there at the site.  :coffee:

 

 

 And to make it worse were I live, the tower that is about half a mile away from the house goes down at least once or twice a week. It funny when I call it in and they have to call me back multiple times due to the drop calls.  Hopefully that tower will get updated soon and the issue will go away. Would be great to actually use the phone part of my phone at home with out worrying if the call will drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From now till September we will have intermittent network "errors" in the sense that the NV complete towers are now strained due to lack of 4G signals coming from adjacent cells.  If MR. :dazed:  would pay the local telcos to turn on the fiber connection these sites would already be live. The fiber is there at the site.  :coffee:

 

 And now you will be closed in from every side as 111 & Yale is live & 97 Memorial site was "in progress" Saturday.

 

Do not think after the magical market "launch" that the issues go away either.  Sites will continue to go down for days at random sometimes all services from the site are mixed services.  The LTE site I pick up at my desk at work with a -97dBm signal has a tough time streaming even audio during the middle of the day.  Tech support always has excuses about "updating towers".  Where?  I look everyday and haven't seen crews here in a while.  Ericsson is going to have their work cut out for them...or maybe that's by design to keep their contract?  Recently it seems here that several sites have severe coverage issues even after acceptance.  Maybe QC will catch them on the tail end of the project?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do not think after the magical market "launch" that the issues go away either.  Sites will continue to go down for days at random sometimes all services from the site are mixed services.  The LTE site I pick up at my desk at work with a -97dBm signal has a tough time streaming even audio during the middle of the day.  Tech support always has excuses about "updating towers".  Where?  I look everyday and haven't seen crews here in a while.  Ericsson is going to have their work cut out for them...or maybe that's by design to keep their contract?  Recently it seems here that several sites have severe coverage issues even after acceptance.  Maybe QC will catch them on the tail end of the project?

 

Hope so!

 And to make it worse were I live, the tower that is about half a mile away from the house goes down at least once or twice a week. It funny when I call it in and they have to call me back multiple times due to the drop calls.  Hopefully that tower will get updated soon and the issue will go away. Would be great to actually use the phone part of my phone at home with out worrying if the call will drop.

any NV on your tower yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I have been getting 4G from my building on Chesapeake campus for a few days.  Speed test this morning was 7080 kbps down, 4089 kbps up with a 264 ping.

 

I think my building might be on the northern edge of the signal though since I do not get it when I am on 63rd and Classen.  I have not driven south to do a map on sensorly because of traffic around campus.  Maybe on the way home today.  I am responsible for the dot on Sensorly near NW 62nd and Classen.

 

Well, I mapped it a bit more on sensorly.  I also go the SignalCheck app and here are the results I am seeing:

RSRP: -109 to -113 dBm range

RSRQ: -11 to -20 dB, SNR 10.6 to 14 db

Serving Cell: 05C0E501

 

I always assumed based on the map here that I would be using OK------ or OK------, but since I only get the signal from 62nd and Classen down to I-44 through Villa and I-44, I am guessing it is OK------.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...