Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - DFW Market (Dallas/Ft. Worth/Wichita Falls)


purpleunicorn

Recommended Posts

kinda low. -68 dBm is really good. You're LTE connection speeds don't dive until you get lower than -101 dBm' date=' according to Robert.[/quote']

 

You misunderstood me. EVDO speeds stay steady with signal degradation and do not dive until -101dBm RSSI.

 

LTE is very signal strength dependent. Speed from LTE goes down proportionally with signal strength decrease. The speed posted above with an average signal is actually pretty darn good.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Love in Lewisville, I've been up and down FM3040 all day to no avail...

The most recent map of completed NV towers lacks coverage shows no entries for northern suburbs such as Plano, Frisco, The Colony, Carrollton, and Lewisville. Two towers in Richardson show up, and about an hour ago I established a 4G LTE connection to the one just north of UTD. Then there's one isolated completed tower just South of 380 on Preston Road.

 

The Ft. Worth area shows a lot more completed towers than the Dallas area.

 

Bob

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most recent map of completed NV towers lacks coverage shows no entries for northern suburbs such as Plano, Frisco, The Colony, Carrollton, and Lewisville. Two towers in Richardson show up, and about an hour ago I established a 4G LTE connection to the one just north of UTD. Then there's one isolated completed tower just South of 380 on Preston Road.

 

The Ft. Worth area shows a lot more completed towers than the Dallas area.

 

Bob

Yep I live in Frisco but I was in Dallas for errands..

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I live in Roanoke. I got the crappie end of this stick. Lol. LTE all around me, Enter Roanoke and nope. Anyways.... Robert you show a tower that gets 4G in June. I looked at it and its still got the old and no NV stuff. I'll post pictures if you'd like, and the tower info, if you care. That water tower I was messing with isn't upgraded yet. That guy I was talking to was fing with me. I was to out of it to realize it I guess. If I became a premium would you have the dates on that tower? If you read this. Let me know.

 

Anyways... This is the 4G up and down Highway 170 in Ft Worth. I-35W seems to be looking real good. Ft Worth Alliance Airport is covered. Also Texas Motor Speedway is covered.

 

11-16mbps LTE. 1.2-1.8mbps 3G.

 

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I live in Roanoke. I got the crappie end of this stick. Lol. LTE all around me' date=' Enter Roanoke and nope. Anyways.... Robert you show a tower that gets 4G in June. I looked at it and its still got the old and no NV stuff. I'll post pictures if you'd like, and the tower info, if you care. That water tower I was messing with isn't upgraded yet. That guy I was talking to was fing with me. I was to out of it to realize it I guess. If I became a premium would you have the dates on that tower? If you read this. Let me know.

 

Anyways... This is the 4G up and down Highway 170 in Ft Worth. I-35W seems to be looking real good. Ft Worth Alliance Airport is covered. Also Texas Motor Speedway is covered.

 

11-16mbps LTE. 1.2-1.8mbps 3G.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

Yes, dates are included in the maps in the premier member maps.

 

From JBtoro on Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-2691-0-12507300-1342440690_thumb.jpgpost-2691-0-03894000-1342440685_thumb.jpg

After a battery pull, I was finally able to get LTE signal on my GNex in Lewisville, TX - pretty decent speeds (got up to 23.91Mbps down, 9.71 up)

 

While my home and office are indicated as LTE covered at sprint.com/coverage, I can't get a LTE signal at either location (indoors or outdoors). I only got the LTE signal when I was right next to the Vista Ridge mall in Lewisville, TX

 

So, does this mean that the coverage indicated at sprint.com/coverage is 'future' coverage plans?(hopefully not!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I live in Roanoke. I got the crappie end of this stick. Lol. LTE all around me' date=' Enter Roanoke and nope. Anyways.... Robert you show a tower that gets 4G in June. I looked at it and its still got the old and no NV stuff. I'll post pictures if you'd like, and the tower info, if you care. That water tower I was messing with isn't upgraded yet. That guy I was talking to was fing with me. I was to out of it to realize it I guess. If I became a premium would you have the dates on that tower? If you read this. Let me know.

 

Anyways... This is the 4G up and down Highway 170 in Ft Worth. I-35W seems to be looking real good. Ft Worth Alliance Airport is covered. Also Texas Motor Speedway is covered.

 

11-16mbps LTE. 1.2-1.8mbps 3G.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

As Scott mentions above, the DFW schedule map in the Premier Sponsor section includes dates. I do not have a new schedule for this market. So in sites that are not competed, it shows how far behind schedule they are. Its my understanding that most of the delayed sites are backhaul related.

 

If a site that is scheduled doesn't have backhaul completed, crews will move on to another site where backhaul upgrades may have been done early.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So' date=' does this mean that the coverage indicated at sprint.com/coverage is 'future' coverage plans?(hopefully not!)[/quote']

 

No. It is current coverage. However, two things are in play. One, there are some sites that did not come up online with the launch as planned. Two, I think their maps are extremely liberal in showing coverage areas and do not appear to match up with downtilt info that I have about some of these sites.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the tower in South Arlington is still having issues. I only had a quick connection to LTE while traveling between Mansfield and Burleson. I'm definitely not getting LTE in Mansfield. I'd say the coverage map is more generous than accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at a restaurant in the Riverside neighborhood of Fort Worth. Inside the restaurant I got these speed test results from the tower labeled DA03XC301 on your NV site map.post-2939-13424932807337_thumb.jpgpost-2939-13424933437907_thumb.jpg

Earlier in the day I was downtown and connected to the tower you have labeled DA13XC532.

post-2939-13424935605928_thumb.jpgpost-2939-13424935827067_thumb.jpg

 

Those speeds are faster than my home WiFi. Unfortunately, the towers near my house are still not activated for LTE.

Sent from my GS3 on Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-2691-0-12507300-1342440690_thumb.jpgpost-2691-0-03894000-1342440685_thumb.jpg

After a battery pull, I was finally able to get LTE signal on my GNex in Lewisville, TX - pretty decent speeds (got up to 23.91Mbps down, 9.71 up)

 

While my home and office are indicated as LTE covered at sprint.com/coverage, I can't get a LTE signal at either location (indoors or outdoors). I only got the LTE signal when I was right next to the Vista Ridge mall in Lewisville, TX

 

So, does this mean that the coverage indicated at sprint.com/coverage is 'future' coverage plans?(hopefully not!)

 

I work right near Vista Ridge; Sprint has three tower co-los (One on the big main city tower down the raod from Vista Ridge, the 2nd right near where 121 @ 35E intersect in the NE quad, and the 3rd up on Bennett Road) that I know of from the Clear coverage maps [and a little help from some apps on my phone] :)

 

On the other ead of FM3040 aka Round Grove, headed towards Flower Mound is where I live, I figure that area won't see the 4G love for awhile, I'm in the middle of a big hole in Clear's service area that was future coverage at one point. If I can position the antenna just right /w the CPEi25150, i can get an RSSI of -76 and SnR of 13-17DBi, that to the tower up off Bellaire near Edmonds. I never understood why this little pocket with a few subdivisions seems to be lacking in coverage, 3G and 4G. My t-bolt has decent coverage on VZW LTE.

 

With the HTC EVO 4G LTE, there isn't a battery we can pull. I did install the 1.22 update and the newest radios, but after a few reboots here and there for the fun of it, no 4G in Lewisville I can find. I'll have to venture south later in the week and see what I can discover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Saturday, I took a trip over to UTD and here are three tests I ran:

 

7628267882_9284a67b98.jpg7628267816_56e2d702d9.jpg7628310360_dc90274245.jpg

 

----

 

Then today, while I was out running an errand in Lewisiville, near Vista Ridge Mall, I noticed 4G was on! Cause I was driving, I only had two test while I was stopped at a red light.

 

7628267294_8d5caf6055.jpg7628267704_ece528dacd.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm... You know I think it is backhaul delays. I just turned my Airave off and I am getting 3 bars solid here now, before I was getting one-two bars if I was lucky. But the download speed is still crap. It makes me think they upgraded the towers to NV equipment even though the backhaul isn't ready yet.

 

Not certain but it seems plausible. I'll keep testing over the next few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...