Jump to content

LTE IS LIVE!


Zerovoltz

Recommended Posts

Houston here and been getting LTE for the last 3-4 hours

Maybe they are just testing...

 

6fozyw.jpg

 

3hait.jpg

 

2w6e4aq.jpg

 

Dude, Im not far from you and I know of two towers that were getting LTE near my location and I have nothing still. I wonder if I need to restart my phone or something....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope it does go live a lil early. I have been all around Houston today just seeing if I would get an LTE connection,and nothing. But I did get eHRPD or whatever it is and still have that here at home. Its the first my phone has ever gotten that. Don't really know what it meansthough.

 

eHRPD is just the EVDO software overlay that allows smooth handoffs between 3G and LTE. It is the 3G connection being run through the LTE hub. Sometimes it is faster than the legacy EVDO, sometimes not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet!! At work, I get 3G, but the speeds still suck donkey's.....Im hoping that the LTE is as good or better than what the 4G WiMax was at my work (Penn Machine). I use Slacker radio and on 3G, its not even useable. This anticipation better be worth it lmao!!!

 

Houston is pretty close to donkey shows...

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toggle to CDMA then back to LTE/CDMA. If that doesn't work try toggling airplane mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Dude, Im not far from you and I know of two towers that were getting LTE near my location and I have nothing still. I wonder if I need to restart my phone or something....

 

Make sure you are on CDMA/LTE and try toggling airplane mode on & off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Houston is pretty close to donkey shows...

 

"You boys like Mexico?"

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

eHRPD is just the EVDO software overlay that allows smooth handoffs between 3G and LTE. It is the 3G connection being run through the LTE hub. Sometimes it is faster than the legacy EVDO, sometimes not.

 

Thanks for explaining this to me

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone testing this in San Antonio? I only have a 3d, but I am hoping that when they flip the LTE switch, they will flip the "better 3g" switch too. I get great WIMAX around the city (avg 4 down 1 up), but if I drop to 3g, it is usually 45-80 kbps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone testing this in San Antonio? I only have a 3d, but I am hoping that when they flip the LTE switch, they will flip the "better 3g" switch too. I get great WIMAX around the city (avg 4 down 1 up), but if I drop to 3g, it is usually 45-80 kbps.

 

Just picked up an EVO LTE tonight, no sign of LTE at my house, but I'm connected to a 3G tower that is listed as having LTE deployed. I haven't driven around yet to see if I have any better luck elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people at current LTE sites are averaging about 10mbps down and up (just rounding) with virtually nobody on the network, when it eventually is packed should we expect to see atrocious speeds like are now on 3G (under 500kbps down) or is the technology even better that it should always stay above a few mbps/sec?

 

These speeds are really exciting to see but if in two years we're back under 1mbps down what difference would it really make? I don't know much about the technical side of all this so I'm hoping that LTE will handle crowded networks better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint better still be testing LTE in some of these cities because it seems like some of these speeds are pretty atrocious for a empty LTE network. I am hoping to see 10-15 Mbps avg speeds everywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What app do u use to take screenshot.

 

I am waiting for LTE too in south ATL.

 

And if you have the S3. Karate chop the left side of the screen and wipe right. And tada 'screenshot' Ha! Who thinks of this stuff? Now... Off to delete the 5 screen shots I just took.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people at current LTE sites are averaging about 10mbps down and up (just rounding) with virtually nobody on the network, when it eventually is packed should we expect to see atrocious speeds like are now on 3G (under 500kbps down) or is the technology even better that it should always stay above a few mbps/sec?

 

These speeds are really exciting to see but if in two years we're back under 1mbps down what difference would it really make? I don't know much about the technical side of all this so I'm hoping that LTE will handle crowded networks better.

 

The 10mbps speeds are due to the limitations of 5x5 carriers. The back haul (microwave and fiber) can scale with increasing demand much easier than t1. I foresee much fewer issues maintaining their lte data speeds because of the much more superior back haul that supports it and relatively ample amounts of spectrum to add new carriers into when necessary.

 

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you are off base. Sprint's 5x5 carrier can have speeds up to 20-30Mbps. Some people have reported really high speeds. One thing you have to realize, and I keep saying over and over again, is LTE speeds are very signal strength dependent. Even on Verizon.

 

I was testing my new Verizon MiFi yesterday and hit only 14Mbps as a top speed. I was averaging 8-10Mbps. But I wasn't in strong signal areas. Just mid signal and marginal signals.

 

Also, Sprint has an infant LTE network. It is not fully configured, and speeds may actually be core related and not signal related. Also, most testing I have seen the past 24 hours has been on the EVO LTE and maybe it is device related.

 

Additionally, you guys need to shop around for new testing servers in Speed Test...or maybe use Root Metrics speed tester. LTE uses different routes to the Internet than the things you have previously used. The servers being used may not be ideal for testing LTE in your market. Try a few servers and compare the differences. RootMetrics is typically the best for this because they will try several servers near the backbone entry point automatically.

 

This also happens with 3G Network Vision sites. People would complain that their sites felt faster, but were not testing fast. I suggested switching testing servers and all of a sudden, their upgraded site magically was improved. ;)

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have prepared my body for this!

 

I don't have LTE in Atlanta yet, but my phone is just waiting for it. I do however have a new, upgraded, 3g tower. Managing about 1.8-2.0 down at work where before I could expect no better than 400. It's only a matter of time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Additionally, to those of you who think that Sprint's 5x5 carrier is going to fill up so fast...consider this. Sprint's LTE network is being deployed much denser than Verizon.

 

Verizon has one 10x10 LTE carrier, versus Sprint having one 5x5 carrier. Verizon can handle double the users with 10MHz channels versus Sprint's 5MHz channels. However, Verizon has double the customers. So things are roughly equal in the ability for Sprint to serve its customers similarly to Verizon before even considering site density.

 

Since Sprint is deploying its LTE on PCS spectrum, they have to put it on double to triple the amount of sites Verizon does with one 700 carrier. So over the same coverage area of one Verizon 700 cell, Sprint will actually have more capacity than Verizon does now.

 

All this panic about how Sprint LTE is going to clog up is not founded in facts. You will see LTE speeds stay pretty consistent. Also, Sprint has a lot of options for more capacity when its needed. They have more PCS spectrum for another 5x5 in many markets. They also have LTE 800 and Clearwire LTE coming online as relief valves.

 

We don't need any Chicken Littles running around here. LTE is coming live. This is a good thing. This is not the end of the world as we know it. This is the beginning of the world as we always wanted it.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 16
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Robert and I certainly didn't mean to come off that Sprint LTE was going to quickly fill up and become unusable. I was just curious how relevant these speeds posted now are to the fact that it is a pretty empty network. It sounds like that shouldn't be much of an issue.

 

Let me ask my question in another way and I'm just curious to hear your thoughts. Do you think the speeds people receive in 2-3 years from LTE after the network is more developed and more crowded would be similar (or better) than what they are going to receive now? I realize that there will be optimization along the way but also the network will get more crowded.

 

Just so you know, I'm one of those in the opinion of if you can get a steady 5mbps up and down you really don't need anything more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint must be continuing to work on the network, This morning, when I toggled my airplane mode, I connected LTE to the two nearest towers, but it quickly went to eHRPD and have not been able to connect LTE since. This was at 151st and Nall in OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

We don't need any Chicken Littles running around here. LTE is coming live. This is a good thing. This is not the end of the world as we know it. This is the beginning of the world as we always wanted it.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

S4GRU quote of the year!

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...