Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Speaking of a growing number of B41 sites have you noticed any new Mobilitie sites?

 

I've seen a few added around the first sites in the K-town area, mostly north and west of there.

 

I haven't been traveled out to DTLA or West LA to notice any Mobilitie sites.  Hopefully they start expanding those Mobilitie sites to the OC and eastern parts of LA county (like past the 605 FWY).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I made a FCC complaint, Not really  against Sprint, but San Bernardino County.  Here's Sprint's response...

 

 

See attached.

 

In short, Sprint places the blame for the slow San Bernardino retune on the the IBEZ and the Mexico side not rebanding their 800mhz  Apparently SB County can't reband their 800mhz Safety freq until Mexico side rebands first.   And Sprint can't deploy 800mhz LTE until SB County rebands.  A domino effect.  So until the IBEZ is rebanded, and than SB County, LA Metro and other So Cal areas will have to wait for 800MHZ LTE.

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I made a FCC complaint, Not really  against Sprint, but San Bernardino County.  Here's Sprint's response...

 

 

See attached.

 

In short, Sprint places the blame for the slow San Bernardino retune on the the IBEZ and the Mexico side not rebanding their 800mhz  Apparently SB County can't reband their 800mhz Safety freq until Mexico side rebands first.   And Sprint can't deploy 800mhz LTE until SB County rebands.  A domino effect.  So until the IBEZ is rebanded, and than SB County, LA Metro and other So Cal areas will have to wait for 800MHZ LTE.

 

Good info. Too bad they don't mention their progress on deploying 800Mhz 1x and how far in advance that will come before LTE. I'd love to have LTE at all times indoors, but I'd settle to first have a good calling experience.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I made a FCC complaint, Not really against Sprint, but San Bernardino County. Here's Sprint's response...

 

 

That was a clever way to get a response.

 

It basically aligns with what I was told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was a clever way to get a response.

 

It basically aligns with what I was told.

 

So that 2H2018 was probably just a conservative guess on their part since they really don't know. At least that's what it sounds like. Could be anytime all the way up till the next 2 years

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that 2H2018 was probably just a conservative guess on their part since they really don't know. At least that's what it sounds like. Could be anytime all the way up till the next 2 years

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Two years actually seems about right depending on how quick Mexico rebands. Once Mexico is finished then sprint has to wait on San Bernardino to finish up. Then at some point sprint then has to put 800 MHz RRUs on nearly every site in SoCal, or at least the ones that got NV upgrades after they realize this was going to take an extra 7 years...

 

Nextel. The gift that keeps on giving. [emoji23]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I made a FCC complaint, Not really  against Sprint, but San Bernardino County.  Here's Sprint's response...

 

 

See attached.

 

In short, Sprint places the blame for the slow San Bernardino retune on the the IBEZ and the Mexico side not rebanding their 800mhz  Apparently SB County can't reband their 800mhz Safety freq until Mexico side rebands first.   And Sprint can't deploy 800mhz LTE until SB County rebands.  A domino effect.  So until the IBEZ is rebanded, and than SB County, LA Metro and other So Cal areas will have to wait for 800MHZ LTE.

 

 

Did you know that Trump promised that his proposed wall will not only block people from entering the country, but it will also block all RF to/from Mexico?  Problem solved!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you know that Trump promised that his proposed wall will not only block people from entering the country, but it will also block all RF to/from Mexico? Problem solved!

Mexico is sending all its bad signals and interference over here. (Maybe some of the signals are OK.)

 

We're going to build a Faraday Wall and AT&T Mexico is going to pay for it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

The Mobilitie small cell invasion has begun creeping toward Universal City and just SE of Burbank.  They seem to have streamlined the design and installation to something more visually appealing than the initial batch in K-Town and Hollywood.

 

qQlfRI9m.jpg

cg3Ptm2m.png

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Mobilitie small cell invasion has begun creeping toward Universal City and just SE of Burbank.  They seem to have streamlined the design and installation to something more visually appealing than the initial batch in K-Town and Hollywood.

 

 

 

 

Is there a higher res picture you might be able to link to? Just want to take a closer look!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a higher res picture you might be able to link to? Just want to take a closer look!

 

 

Here's a link to the full res picture, but it's just an iPhone pic:

http://imgur.com/qQlfRI9

 

And here's a much better closeup of a similar setup from Jonathan Kramer's site.  The only difference is a missing cover on the post of the top mounted antenna:

http://wireless.blog.law/2016/10/23/mobilities-walrus-design/ 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a link to the full res picture, but it's just an iPhone pic:

http://imgur.com/qQlfRI9

 

And here's a much better closeup of a similar setup from Jonathan Kramer's site.  The only difference is a missing cover on the post of the top mounted antenna:

http://wireless.blog.law/2016/10/23/mobilities-walrus-design/ 

 

That works! The inline photo just appeared really small on my phone. Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a link to the full res picture, but it's just an iPhone pic:

http://imgur.com/qQlfRI9

 

And here's a much better closeup of a similar setup from Jonathan Kramer's site.  The only difference is a missing cover on the post of the top mounted antenna:

http://wireless.blog.law/2016/10/23/mobilities-walrus-design/ 

 

Nice to see Nokia FTHC LTE UE Relay antennas are now in service. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice to see Nokia FTHC LTE UE Relay antennas are now in service. 

 

 

It's good to see more Nokia gear in this market.

 

Also, the placement of this site is interesting.  It's very close to a macro site (as in 1500 ft. or so away).  It seems to strategically fill in an area that might be in a signal "shadow" due to some structures in the way.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good to see more Nokia gear in this market.

 

Also, the placement of this site is interesting.  It's very close to a macro site (as in 1500 ft. or so away).  It seems to strategically fill in an area that might be in a signal "shadow" due to some structures in the way.

 

Very likely IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good to see more Nokia gear in this market.

 

Also, the placement of this site is interesting. It's very close to a macro site (as in 1500 ft. or so away). It seems to strategically fill in an area that might be in a signal "shadow" due to some structures in the way.

Hopefully they install some of these in 91214

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully they install some of these in 91214

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Or even the entire SoCal market from Orange County, to riverside county, to the I.E. and San Diego county...and like soon lol.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or even the entire SoCal market from Orange County, to riverside county, to the I.E. and San Diego county...and like soon lol.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ya I agree. For some reason, it seems like SoCal is being neglected in the sprint network upgrades

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya I agree. For some reason, it seems like SoCal is being neglected in the sprint network upgrades

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I second that. No new upgrades since early 2016 in San Diego. Permits been dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I second that. No new upgrades since early 2016 in San Diego. Permits been dead.

You may be surprised. I find my first macro 2.5 permit just this week after more than a year of nothing.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...