Jump to content

Report Your LTE Connection Here


Recommended Posts

Ran into some interesting speedtests driving west from Highway 100 and 394 in St. Louis Park to 169 and points northwards. I noticed during one of the tests it changed the test server from Minnetonka MN to Detroit MI and back. Odd.

 

lte4.png

 

A little later:

lte5.png

 

Farther north but nearing the edge of LTE in that part of town - still getting respectable speed even at -118 dbm:

lte7.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chelsea, MA on 12/14/12 (Up to 6 Download)

Van Nuys, CA on 12/26/12 (Up to 26 Mbs Download)

Linden, VA on 1/19/13 (Up to 18 Mbs Download)

 

Tested on Galaxy Nexus

Edited by Jon_h
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fajardo, Puerto Rico 6 -17 Mbps :tu:

 

Wow, that's awesome, and I'm very jealous heh...

 

I noticed LTE in the metro area yesterday, for the first time ever, but it was very brief... Not sure if it's a test site or what. Driving out of my home, along carretera #2 - corner of Suchville (near the police station, between Bayamon & Guaynabo).

 

My phone connected on the way out and again on the way in, held the LTE connection even as I got home (further away from that street corner) but eventually lost it, didn't even have time to do a Speedtest because I didn't have the app installed and I was driving anyway. I did take a screenshot of the 4G settings page when I stopped at a light tho, not sure if that has any use.

 

Is there a thread or something around here specific to Puerto Rico? Just joined and I'm a bit lost, I don't mind putting in a donation for the member's zones if that's where it's at... Just curious if there's a lot of other members from PR around here.

Edited by Impulse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Managed to sensorly map some new LTE in East Orlando today between Howell Branch and Aloma. I've been seeing LTE mapped for a few weeks now, but not picking it up on my phone. Finally starting to see in on the phone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got LTE in Beaverton, OR... near SW Scholls Ferry Rd and SW Roy Rodgers Rd.

 

Getting 4G down here in Salem recently. Just started Wednesday and it didn't stay on very long but tonight it's connected and been on 4G for most of the night. My best speedtest so far was 8down/10up.

 

0vgYg2U.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Getting 4G down here in Salem recently. Just started Wednesday and it didn't stay on very long but tonight it's connected and been on 4G for most of the night. My best speedtest so far was 8down/10up.

 

 

Ah cool! If you have a program called Sensorly, you can use that to map out the 4G down there where you found it. :tu:

 

Sent from my Rooted Galaxy Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm new to this forum but I joined because I was so excited to see that I now have 4G LTE in Hillsboro' date=' Oregon.[/quote']

 

What part of Hillsboro? Just wondering because I got a tag of that last night and want to try and narrow it down. :)

 

Sent from my Rooted Galaxy Note II using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chemistry Rom on xda uses actual signal for bars on LTE connection for samsung galaxy s3

 

here is a screenshot showing that..

 

Screenshot_2013-02-01-22-13-39_zps458e8d82.png

 

(yes, im connected to an airave at the moment lol ) (lte went to 3g 2 seconds after grabbing this shot) LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now you got me thinking as I was digesting the goofiness they have in Systemui to display the signal. I was trying to see if it would be easy to put numbers instead of bars like in CM.

 

Will have to see if it would be easy to flip it for data signal. Hmmm... Hope it is easy.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signs of 4G in San Diego!

 

Driving home last night on the I-5 south at Gilman Dr. I picked up a 4G signal! Pure luck that I glanced at my phone at that time and noticed it. I looped back and exited at Gilman Dr. to get a speed test.

 

Hopefully this a good sign that San Diego might be going live soon.

 

2013-02-01 17.02.14.png

 

2013-02-01 17.10.40.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LTE in Eaton Rapids, Michigan. I was driving the entire time but speed tests were 14 down and 10 up.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was sitting in my dentist office in Martin City, MO and decided to do a speed test. Wow :tu:

Mapped a bunch of LTE today on sensorly.

 

 

ZrZyng1l.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What part of Hillsboro? Just wondering because I got a tag of that last night and want to try and narrow it down. :)

 

Sent from my Rooted Galaxy Note II using Forum Runner

Check out sensorly for Hillsboro. A coworker and I have mapped most all of the live LTE areas to date.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out sensorly for Hillsboro. A coworker and I have mapped most all of the live LTE areas to date.

 

Nice work! Thanks for helping with all that mapping. Now if you can help find that tower near the Sylvan area, we'll be in great shape, lol.

 

Sent from my Rooted Galaxy Note II using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice work! Thanks for helping with all that mapping. Now if you can help find that tower near the Sylvan area, we'll be in great shape, lol.

 

Sent from my Rooted Galaxy Note II using Forum Runner

I did post a screen shot of my LTE engineering screen while connected to LTE on the mystery Sylvan tower last Friday in the Washington/Oregon forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm getting an LTE signal indoors at my work. I'm right on the edge of the coverage area at El Camino Real and College Blvd in Carlsbad, CA 92008.

 

I got report of three more additional San Diego sites last night. But I had a plumbing emergency and haven't had a chance to look up the locations yet.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about your plumbing. As I have long suspected, it's a lot easier to be patient when you are in an LTE area (like me!). ;)

 

I'm happy when each of our members gets LTE. However, the day that you received LTE is one of the chief NV milestones for me. Next to perhaps my own.

 

This makes San Diego one of the fastest markets that AlcaLu switched from 3G only to start firing up LTE. Hope they start making this a trend. Only Raleigh/Durham, Charlotte and Norfolk started LTE sooner into the NV process...as far as Alcatel Lucent is concerned.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...