Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Lower Central Valley Market (Fresno, Bakersfield, Visalia)


aelenes

Recommended Posts

Im not seeing anything on sensorly?

 

Have we been FOOLED?

I would sure hope not, but we just can't be sure. If we could have had a screenshot with a map showing current location and LTE at the same time, that would be awesome.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't use sensorly

 

I used it in Florissant mo and it showed areas of lte but when I tried to locate my phone showed only 3g

 

Why do you not use Sensorly? We need to you map the LTE coverage that you find! It's the most reliable way of knowing where LTE is, much better than the Sprint coverage maps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I already explained why lol

 

You don't use it because you couldn't find LTE where it showed there was? Simple answer to that. Someone either had a stronger device than you and was able to pick up LTE in that area, or the tower was down for any number of reasons. Florrisant is not in a launched market, and Sprint has no obligation to keep those towers operating 24/7 until the market is launched. 

 

If this is why you are not using Sensorly, that is a very, very silly reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My reason is sound

 

I have a gs3

 

 

Sensorly said I had lte there which it didn't I went to several places

 

The airport had it though it was right about that

 

Frankly, I don't understand your reason. Someone was able to map an LTE signal, then for some reason, that tower (or towers) were taken down by Sprint and you were not able to connect. But that doesn't change the fact that someone had been able to map LTE in that area. That particular area is back online now, I can tell you that for a fact. Please tell me how Sensorly gave you any false information? 

 

As the saying goes on this site - "Sensorly or it didn't happen."

 

Until we see those Sensorly blips on Fresno, we cannot confirm LTE is active in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can I not make this clear?

 

It said I had lte available but my phone didn't pick it up for the entirety of my visit

 

That is the nature of Sensorly, and the Sprint buildout. Signals come and go during the buildout. That area does in fact have LTE coverage now, as the issue with the towers was fixed.

 

As the saying goes on this site - "Sensorly or it didn't happen."

 

Until we see those Sensorly blips on Fresno, we cannot confirm LTE is active in the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I still have to say I don't understand why that one experience makes you refuse to use Sensorly. It's not like it lied to you. The information it showed was valid. The network changed. Sensorly has no way of knowing when a site is up or down due to maintenance.

 

You don't even have to look at the map, just map for the rest of us. It's not that hard, and it lets others that maybe don't visit this site see that there is LTE in the area. 

 

The main reason we ask for Sensorly is we have had people troll the pages, posting that "I have LTE in XYZ City! Look here's a screen shot of my speedtest!" when in reality, they were not in XYZ City. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I seen lte pop up on my gfs gs3 on shaw and villa

 

 

Maybe on of those is the one my wife's gs3 accidently picked up?

 

What is this, Utah?

 

You wont tell us where you allegedly picked up Sprint LTE because you know I will drive out there. I already did that at the Shaw/Villa site that would have been the one that you picked up, so you don't want to repeat that mistake. Bad trolling job is bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol by all means go for it

 

It's in an area u once spoke of

 

Why can't you just tell us so someone can go map it and that way Dkoellerwx can add it to the map he has located here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just leave it at that if ya don't wanna believe me I already said where it was it's not on me lol I took a screenie. Of it

 

It's not my problem if u can't find it maybe it was just on when I happen to be around who knows right like u said about the Florissant thing

Edited by dontsh00tmesanta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol, hopefully for not too much longer. With all of the sites I've sought out, I sure hope I'm the first one on S4GRU to actually see it (cough cough) in the Fresno area.

 

You can have Visalia/Tulare, though!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...