Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Anything holding them back? Hardware issues?

If both 5x5 bandwidth slices are beside each other, Sprint combines them and makes them into a 10x10 which improves top end speed, edge of cell reception, etc.  If the 5x5's are not beside each other, they will stay as 2 separate 5x5's as Sprints equipment is not configured at this time to be able to perform CA on B25.  2 5x5's means that you get double the total shared bandwidth but not double the top end speed.

 

In as many cases as they can, Sprint is trading some of their bandwidth with other carriers so that both end up with more contiguous bandwidth.  Both carriers can then change to 10x10, 15x15, or 20x20.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If both 5x5 bandwidth slices are beside each other, Sprint combines them and makes them into a 10x10 which improves top end speed, edge of cell reception, etc. If the 5x5's are not beside each other, they will stay as 2 separate 5x5's as Sprints equipment is not configured at this time to be able to perform CA on B25. 2 5x5's means that you get double the total shared bandwidth but not double the top end speed.

 

In as many cases as they can, Sprint is trading some of their bandwidth with other carriers so that both end up with more contiguous bandwidth. Both carriers can then change to 10x10, 15x15, or 20x20.

Great explanation. Thank you, you and tongboy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This thread has been abandoned for long enough...

 

Yesterday I discovered a brand new sprint site on this T-Mobile owned tower:

32CB025B-3626-4207-B768-D7EC24A1EF1B_zps

 

From top to bottom it goes: T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&T and the bottom is presumably Verizon (it's brand new too).

 

I guess that means sprint is adding sites in my area. Though I don't remember this spot being weak to begin with.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread has been abandoned for long enough...

 

Yesterday I discovered a brand new sprint site on this T-Mobile owned tower:

 

 

From top to bottom it goes: T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&T and the bottom is presumably Verizon (it's brand new too).

 

I guess that means sprint is adding sites in my area. Though I don't remember this spot being weak to begin with.

 

Location? O_O

 

Could it be a former Clear site or Maybe even an old USCC vacated site?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Location? O_O

 

Could it be a former Clear site or Maybe even an old USCC vacated site?

Good question, definitely not Clear, I don't think USCC either but they took those sites down pretty much the day after that was shut down so I could be wrong.

 

It's at 61st and Taft st. Merrillville, IN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question, definitely not Clear, I don't think USCC either but they took those sites down pretty much the day after that was shut down so I could be wrong.

 

It's at 61st and Taft st. Merrillville, IN.

 

OOooo. That was a former Nextel location so a nextel conversion!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That is one fugly, ramshackle looking tower.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now you hurt it's feelings!

 

Hurt it is feelings?

 

I can has cheezburger?

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurt it is feelings?

 

I can has cheezburger?

 

AJ

Ugh! My bad... Now its feelings are really hurt!

 

I can't tell if the middle row is abandoned with the cables in place or if something is there...

 

Sent from my 2PS64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't tell if the middle row is abandoned with the cables in place or if something is there...

 

Somebody needs to get all of those sectors aligned.  The proper orientation is N/SE/SW.  As it stands, that tower looks like a first grader put it together.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is one fugly, ramshackle looking tower.

 

AJ

This ones worse:

 

D327DABA-8D80-4F5B-8AD2-7046511D8656_zps

 

 

Ugh! My bad... Now its feelings are really hurt!

 

I can't tell if the middle row is abandoned with the cables in place or if something is there...

 

Sent from my 2PS64

IDK what the deal is with that center rack, I see a few towers around with those kinds of setups still. IDK if it's a WISP (do they even have setups like that?) or if it's from a defunct carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This ones worse:

 

 

 

 

 

IDK what the deal is with that center rack, I see a few towers around with those kinds of setups still. IDK if it's a WISP (do they even have setups like that?) or if it's from a defunct carrier.

Those remind me of some of the US cellular setups we had around here in the north eastern Illinois area. A single tiny antenna per sector.

 

Sent from my 2PS64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those remind me of some of the US cellular setups we had around here in the north eastern Illinois area. A single tiny antenna per sector.

 

Sent from my 2PS64

 

That's what they all were around here too. I thought the towers were abandoned or something. Guess they didn't need more then that considering they only ran PCS 1x/EVDO. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Had a connection flight through O'Hare today with a ~3hr layover - is service normally as bad as I experienced today?  There were 1-2 times I would get LTE connections, but mostly I kept changing between eHRPD (with !@#$ or something along those lines underneath), 1x, and no signal.  This was in the terminal with L gates (didn't have to move between flights much).   I was really surprised since in all other airports we hit on our trip (BWI, LAX & PDX) we had excellent/consistent coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a connection flight through O'Hare today with a ~3hr layover - is service normally as bad as I experienced today? There were 1-2 times I would get LTE connections, but mostly I kept changing between eHRPD (with !@#$ or something along those lines underneath), 1x, and no signal. This was in the terminal with L gates (didn't have to move between flights much). I was really surprised since in all other airports we hit on our trip (BWI, LAX & PDX) we had excellent/consistent coverage.

Must be something that broke. Service has been consistently great there in all my experience the last few years.

 

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be something that broke. Service has been consistently great there in all my experience the last few years.

 

You broke it, you bought it.  PythonFanTN, you now owe Sprint eleventy billion dollars.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some "update" must have happen. Cause I'm being sent to ehrpd much more then I've ever been in the past year..

 

Had a connection flight through O'Hare today with a ~3hr layover - is service normally as bad as I experienced today? There were 1-2 times I would get LTE connections, but mostly I kept changing between eHRPD (with !@#$ or something along those lines underneath), 1x, and no signal. This was in the terminal with L gates (didn't have to move between flights much). I was really surprised since in all other airports we hit on our trip (BWI, LAX & PDX) we had excellent/consistent coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...