Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Anything holding them back? Hardware issues?

If both 5x5 bandwidth slices are beside each other, Sprint combines them and makes them into a 10x10 which improves top end speed, edge of cell reception, etc.  If the 5x5's are not beside each other, they will stay as 2 separate 5x5's as Sprints equipment is not configured at this time to be able to perform CA on B25.  2 5x5's means that you get double the total shared bandwidth but not double the top end speed.

 

In as many cases as they can, Sprint is trading some of their bandwidth with other carriers so that both end up with more contiguous bandwidth.  Both carriers can then change to 10x10, 15x15, or 20x20.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If both 5x5 bandwidth slices are beside each other, Sprint combines them and makes them into a 10x10 which improves top end speed, edge of cell reception, etc. If the 5x5's are not beside each other, they will stay as 2 separate 5x5's as Sprints equipment is not configured at this time to be able to perform CA on B25. 2 5x5's means that you get double the total shared bandwidth but not double the top end speed.

 

In as many cases as they can, Sprint is trading some of their bandwidth with other carriers so that both end up with more contiguous bandwidth. Both carriers can then change to 10x10, 15x15, or 20x20.

Great explanation. Thank you, you and tongboy.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This thread has been abandoned for long enough...

 

Yesterday I discovered a brand new sprint site on this T-Mobile owned tower:

32CB025B-3626-4207-B768-D7EC24A1EF1B_zps

 

From top to bottom it goes: T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&T and the bottom is presumably Verizon (it's brand new too).

 

I guess that means sprint is adding sites in my area. Though I don't remember this spot being weak to begin with.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread has been abandoned for long enough...

 

Yesterday I discovered a brand new sprint site on this T-Mobile owned tower:

 

 

From top to bottom it goes: T-Mobile, Sprint, AT&T and the bottom is presumably Verizon (it's brand new too).

 

I guess that means sprint is adding sites in my area. Though I don't remember this spot being weak to begin with.

 

Location? O_O

 

Could it be a former Clear site or Maybe even an old USCC vacated site?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Location? O_O

 

Could it be a former Clear site or Maybe even an old USCC vacated site?

Good question, definitely not Clear, I don't think USCC either but they took those sites down pretty much the day after that was shut down so I could be wrong.

 

It's at 61st and Taft st. Merrillville, IN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question, definitely not Clear, I don't think USCC either but they took those sites down pretty much the day after that was shut down so I could be wrong.

 

It's at 61st and Taft st. Merrillville, IN.

 

OOooo. That was a former Nextel location so a nextel conversion!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

That is one fugly, ramshackle looking tower.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now you hurt it's feelings!

 

Hurt it is feelings?

 

I can has cheezburger?

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurt it is feelings?

 

I can has cheezburger?

 

AJ

Ugh! My bad... Now its feelings are really hurt!

 

I can't tell if the middle row is abandoned with the cables in place or if something is there...

 

Sent from my 2PS64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't tell if the middle row is abandoned with the cables in place or if something is there...

 

Somebody needs to get all of those sectors aligned.  The proper orientation is N/SE/SW.  As it stands, that tower looks like a first grader put it together.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is one fugly, ramshackle looking tower.

 

AJ

This ones worse:

 

D327DABA-8D80-4F5B-8AD2-7046511D8656_zps

 

 

Ugh! My bad... Now its feelings are really hurt!

 

I can't tell if the middle row is abandoned with the cables in place or if something is there...

 

Sent from my 2PS64

IDK what the deal is with that center rack, I see a few towers around with those kinds of setups still. IDK if it's a WISP (do they even have setups like that?) or if it's from a defunct carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This ones worse:

 

 

 

 

 

IDK what the deal is with that center rack, I see a few towers around with those kinds of setups still. IDK if it's a WISP (do they even have setups like that?) or if it's from a defunct carrier.

Those remind me of some of the US cellular setups we had around here in the north eastern Illinois area. A single tiny antenna per sector.

 

Sent from my 2PS64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those remind me of some of the US cellular setups we had around here in the north eastern Illinois area. A single tiny antenna per sector.

 

Sent from my 2PS64

 

That's what they all were around here too. I thought the towers were abandoned or something. Guess they didn't need more then that considering they only ran PCS 1x/EVDO. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Had a connection flight through O'Hare today with a ~3hr layover - is service normally as bad as I experienced today?  There were 1-2 times I would get LTE connections, but mostly I kept changing between eHRPD (with !@#$ or something along those lines underneath), 1x, and no signal.  This was in the terminal with L gates (didn't have to move between flights much).   I was really surprised since in all other airports we hit on our trip (BWI, LAX & PDX) we had excellent/consistent coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a connection flight through O'Hare today with a ~3hr layover - is service normally as bad as I experienced today? There were 1-2 times I would get LTE connections, but mostly I kept changing between eHRPD (with !@#$ or something along those lines underneath), 1x, and no signal. This was in the terminal with L gates (didn't have to move between flights much). I was really surprised since in all other airports we hit on our trip (BWI, LAX & PDX) we had excellent/consistent coverage.

Must be something that broke. Service has been consistently great there in all my experience the last few years.

 

Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be something that broke. Service has been consistently great there in all my experience the last few years.

 

You broke it, you bought it.  PythonFanTN, you now owe Sprint eleventy billion dollars.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some "update" must have happen. Cause I'm being sent to ehrpd much more then I've ever been in the past year..

 

Had a connection flight through O'Hare today with a ~3hr layover - is service normally as bad as I experienced today? There were 1-2 times I would get LTE connections, but mostly I kept changing between eHRPD (with !@#$ or something along those lines underneath), 1x, and no signal. This was in the terminal with L gates (didn't have to move between flights much). I was really surprised since in all other airports we hit on our trip (BWI, LAX & PDX) we had excellent/consistent coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • Oct security update is out.
    • Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...