Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Chicago Market


thesickness069

Recommended Posts

Those of you with an M8 can disable B25 to check B26/B41 coverage while you're there. I'm not going this year, sadly, but I do want to see speed tests from congested sectors.

 

Can a one max do that now? i know we couldn't do it when it first came out, but i didn't keep/follow up with the topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. I was able to text, send picture messages, and make calls about 80 percent of the time. I only found myself on B41 once and the second carrier a handful of times. No B26 there, which could have been helpful. My sister on her iPhone 4 had a less than stellar experience as she couldn't send any texts via SMS, but her iMessages were working just fine on 3G. My friend with Verizon was stuck on 1x most of the time, so that make me a little warm and fuzzy on the inside. Next year I'm expecting an even better experience. Later this month I'm going to North Coast, so it will be interesting to see how the network performs there too.

 

Edit: I also did not lose LTE once. That right there is a win as well!

Yeah let me know about North Coast, I will be going to Riot Fest next month and will be checking things out there.  I noticed about the same as you, Id say 75% of the time I could do what I wanted, but I stuck myself on EVDO and 1XRTT on purpose to save battery.  My sister who has an iphone 4s from ATT couldn't do squat and oddly enough my one buddy who has an iPhone 5 from Sprint also said he couldn't do squat, I am going to assume he got stuck on the overcrowded B25 original carrier since you say there was no B26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did sprint or any other carriers have cows in the area??

I saw them but I was too preoccupied with music, drinking, and girls to bother go taking a look.  I saw the COW behind the Perrys stage on Columbus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet!! Between the music and the girls. Who wouldn't be looking at other things then the cows lol

For sure, its safe to say whoever took the over on girls wearing those high waisted 80s style acid wash shorts made a killing this weekend.  Too bad they are ugly as hell on 95% of girls who wear em.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For sure, its safe to say whoever took the over on girls wearing those high waisted 80s style acid wash shorts made a killing this weekend. Too bad they are ugly as hell on 95% of girls who wear em.

I've been talking to my buddies about this exact trend. I don't get it, and frankly, it isn't really attractive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah let me know about North Coast, I will be going to Riot Fest next month and will be checking things out there. I noticed about the same as you, Id say 75% of the time I could do what I wanted, but I stuck myself on EVDO and 1XRTT on purpose to save battery. My sister who has an iphone 4s from ATT couldn't do squat and oddly enough my one buddy who has an iPhone 5 from Sprint also said he couldn't do squat, I am going to assume he got stuck on the overcrowded B25 original carrier since you say there was no B26.

Your friend with the iphone 5 could have benefited from the second pcs carrier, just like your s3. I'm sure there was some second carrier being broadcasted in that area. There was when I was there 2 weeks ago.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet!! Between the music and the girls. Who wouldn't be looking at other things then the cows lol

 

You could look at the girls who are cows.

 

Ooh, ouch, that was cold!

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been talking to my buddies about this exact trend. I don't get it, and frankly, it isn't really attractive.

Find a girl who has a small waist, coupled with a larger than average butt (just for example, go with white girls who usually have zero butt at all lol). To the point where they go up a size or two in shorts to get them over their butt. The high wasted ones actually show off their butts without making them look frumpy or fat in the waist/midsection.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find a girl who has a small waist, coupled with a larger than average butt (just for example, go with white girls who usually have zero butt at all lol). To the point where they go up a size or two in shorts to get them over their butt. The high wasted ones actually show off their butts without making them look frumpy or fat in the waist/midsection.

 

I can't believe I just read that in the Chicago network thread of a wireless nerd site.   :hmm:

 

Robert

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe I just read that in the Chicago network thread of a wireless nerd site. :hmm:

 

Robert

I'm not the one who started the conversation about the ladies. Don't you know the age old rule of keep your woman happy and you'll be happy? To do that I sometimes am forced to go shopping with my girlfriend, it makes it easier to get out quick when you can grab things for them lol. Oh and I've worked in the stock rooms of a few clothing stores...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not the one who started the conversation about the ladies. Don't you know the age old rule of keep your woman happy and you'll be happy? To do that I sometimes am forced to go shopping with my girlfriend, it makes it easier to get out quick when you can grab things for them lol. Oh and I've worked in the stock rooms of a few clothing stores...

 

I've married the most beautiful woman who loves me, dotes on me, and satisfies my every desire.  I'm a very lucky man.

 

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I set my phone to CDMA only like I was saying earlier to save battery, which worked, but then I noticed the entire time my Signal Check Pro said I was on EVDO 3G.  I thought we are done with EVDO in Chicago now since all our sites are NV1.0 complete and broadcasting 3G as eHRPD.  When I turn it back to LTE/CDMA and I go into 3G then my Signal Check says eHRPD.  Did I misinterpret something here, I thought I wasn't supposed to see EVDO show up anymore in NV1.0 complete markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I set my phone to CDMA only like I was saying earlier to save battery, which worked, but then I noticed the entire time my Signal Check Pro said I was on EVDO 3G.  I thought we are done with EVDO in Chicago now since all our sites are NV1.0 complete and broadcasting 3G as eHRPD.  When I turn it back to LTE/CDMA and I go into 3G then my Signal Check says eHRPD.  Did I misinterpret something here, I thought I wasn't supposed to see EVDO show up anymore in NV1.0 complete markets.

 

You cannot use eHRPD when in CDMA only mode.  eHRPD is the EVDO that runs through the LTE core.  You essentially shut down all things LTE when you go into CDMA only mode, including eHRPD.  eHRPD and EVDO are exactly the same thing.  It's one and the same signal, just the network side traffic routing and processing is different.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cannot use eHRPD when in CDMA only mode.  eHRPD is the EVDO that runs through the LTE core.  You essentially shut down all things LTE when you go into CDMA only mode, including eHRPD.  eHRPD and EVDO are exactly the same thing.  It's one and the same signal, just the network side traffic routing and processing is different.

 

Robert

Boom, got it now.  Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find a girl who has a small waist, coupled with a larger than average butt (just for example, go with white girls who usually have zero butt at all lol). To the point where they go up a size or two in shorts to get them over their butt. The high wasted ones actually show off their butts without making them look frumpy or fat in the waist/midsection.

Girls in high waisted 80s style shorts :td:

Girls in good ole low waisted short shorts :tu:

Sprint service at Lolla 2014 :banana:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a brief question. They started band 26, about a month and a half ago. I am seeing speeds at 2 down, and 12 up, and before they were the opposite, and I saw the numbers even out a couple times. The times of day that I find the numbers to go up or down does NOT really change much, even at like 2 am... Can someone tell me what is going on? I know I made the cardinal sin, no more talking about chicks, *sigh*, any help with the question is appreciated guys!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a brief question. They started band 26, about a month and a half ago. I am seeing speeds at 2 down, and 12 up, and before they were the opposite, and I saw the numbers even out a couple times. The times of day that I find the numbers to go up or down does NOT really change much, even at like 2 am... Can someone tell me what is going on? I know I made the cardinal sin, no more talking about chicks, *sigh*, any help with the question is appreciated guys!

 

I'm not entirely sure what you are asking. Why are uploads faster than downloads? Or why do the speeds never change?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they get slower? Probably because more triband or iPhone 5s/c devices started using the new band.

 

Well, that's a little odd... It's the same speeds at VERY LATE HOURS... So that might not be it? When I'm in the city, the later it gets, the speeds change drastically.. I don't understand why it's doing this a month and a half after upgrades..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i once had the issues where the upload and download speeds seemed reversed. What i ended up doing is having sprint refresh the data profile on my phone.

 

Prl update joke, sorry, I didn't get it until later, I just had an epidural today, I'm literally EXHAUSTED, I'm a disabled vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that's a little odd... It's the same speeds at VERY LATE HOURS... So that might not be it? When I'm in the city, the later it gets, the speeds change drastically.. I don't understand why it's doing this a month and a half after upgrades..

I have only seen this hours when the carrier was super crowded during peak work hours in the loop.  When I check later at night when the loop empties out it usually goes back to greater DL bandwidth than upload, your situation is strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...