Jump to content

Current Sprint PRLs


halcyoncmdr

Recommended Posts

EVDO roaming may have been shut off, but as AJ says, 1xRTT is either on, or off. There is no data switch in the PRL for 1xRTT. Your Verizon hotspot is likely running on EVDO. 1xRTT is extremely slow to begin with, and any amount of traffic will cut into available speeds (think Kbps as the top speed).

No what I'm saying is that when I roam on Verizon EVDO on my sprint phone it doesn't load anything but it works fine on my Verizon MiFi. It's perplexed me - I can't seem to come up with a good explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No what I'm saying is that when I roam on Verizon EVDO on my sprint phone it doesn't load anything but it works fine on my Verizon MiFi. It's perplexed me - I can't seem to come up with a good explanation.

 

Then Verizon is not authenticating your device. If it's even an area that allows EVDO roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RAvirani, on 04 Apr 2016 - 5:15 PM, said:snapback.png

 

A PRL update seems to have caused the problem so it is only natural thinking that another PRL update will fix it. I have experienced the same thing ever since I got PRL 55051 and no, it is not that Verizon's CDMA network has become decrepit in my area for my Verizon hotspot works fine on CDMA. I don't really know what the problem is but it sure seems like it was that 55051 PRL update.

 It started with PRL 55051 as you say. 

Whether it was caused by the PRL 55051 update or merely coincidental timing, right after my phone updated to PRL 55051 I lost all roaming (voice/text/data) on I-35 north of Mason City, IA to around the first rest area in MN and in the "I-90 gap" in Sprint service between Austin and the Rochester turnoff.  After a call to Sprint customer service eventually voice/text roaming came back, then later on 1x data, so I suspect authentication issues.  Also note that according to Sprint's coverage map I-35 north of Mason City is supposed to have native Sprint EVDO all the way to the Minnesota border but my phone has always switched to roaming or no service by time I pass by the Diamond Jo casino (Exit 214).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does PRL 55052 take away EVDO roaming from USCC sites? The "3G & More" coverage map has been updated again and there's no longer 3G extended coverage shown in Nebraska,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does PRL 55052 take away EVDO roaming from USCC sites? The "3G & More" coverage map has been updated again and there's no longer 3G extended coverage shown in Nebraska,

 

USCC was EVDO roaming, but it counted as off network usage. It was never considered "Roaming+" or "Extended." The 3G & More map correctly shows USCC coverage as off network roaming. You'll just get EVDO in that area, whereas in many Verizon roaming areas you'll still be on 1x.

 

USCC LTE roaming still shows, but that's a different map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC was EVDO roaming, but it counted as off network usage. It was never considered "Roaming+" or "Extended." The 3G & More map correctly shows USCC coverage as off network roaming. You'll just get EVDO in that area, whereas in many Verizon roaming areas you'll still be on 1x.

 

USCC LTE roaming still shows, but that's a different map.

I wish I'd saved a screenshot of the previous version of the "3G & More map.  I thought it was strange that USCC EVDO showed as Roaming+ (pseudonative) but USCC LTE was roaming -- this would allow people to put their phones in CDMA mode and avoid the roaming data cap, albeit with slower speeds.

 

This page indicates "Off Network Roaming" is all 1x: http://shop2.sprint.com/en/stores/popups/compare_data_speeds_popup.shtml

 

There isn't a category listed for EVDO non-Extended roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I'd saved a screenshot of the previous version of the "3G & More map.  I thought it was strange that USCC EVDO showed as Roaming+ (pseudonative) but USCC LTE was roaming -- this would allow people to put their phones in CDMA mode and avoid the roaming data cap, albeit with slower speeds.

 

This page indicates "Off Network Roaming" is all 1x: http://shop2.sprint.com/en/stores/popups/compare_data_speeds_popup.shtml

 

There isn't a category listed for EVDO non-Extended roaming.

 

USCC didn't actually show as "Roaming+". The colors were really similar, so it would be easy to confuse, but it was actually shown as 3G Roaming vs. "Nationwide" roaming. I'll see if I have a screenshot.

 

Edit: Here's the screenshot.

 

2015-09-14_1-32-28_2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC didn't actually show as "Roaming+". The colors were really similar, so it would be easy to confuse, but it was actually shown as 3G Roaming vs. "Nationwide" roaming. I'll see if I have a screenshot.

 

Edit: Here's the screenshot.

 

2015-09-14_1-32-28_2.png

 Thanks, I still wonder if PRL 55052 removes EVDO roaming since the current coverage map no longer shows it and it's not listed on the speeds chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone had a chance to look through PRLs 55052 and 54052 to see what's changed yet?

Afaik, no because no one has uploaded a copy of the changed PRL yet. Guess I'll do it this evening if no one else has by then....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I was going to try to look at it at work this morning, but the software I normally use isn't working.  I'll have to try it at home (slower, but should function in any case).

 

EDIT:  Right after posting, I figured out what was wrong.  Will have something shortly.

 

- Trip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the changes I see:

 

In Geo 3, the preferred roaming partners are now SIDs 6498, 21625, and 6499, with EV-DO.  (6498 is United Wireless, 6499 is Nex-Tech Wireless.  21625 isn't in the list I have.)

 

In Geo 4, Sprint native service now includes SIDs 4166 and 22424, the roaming priority of 4305 was increased, and 1211/1465/6488/152 were added.  (See Geo 9 below.)

 

In Geo 5, 1382 and 1996 were added as preferred roaming partners.  (C-Spire.)

 

In Geo 6, 4305 was increased, but also added to roaming are 264/1394/2094/113.  2094 comes with EV-DO.  (113 is Verizon, 264/1394 is C-Spire, 2094 is not in my list.  4305 is SI Wireless.)

 

In Geo 7, 4305 was increased, but 1280/6490/6492 were added.  All three come with EV-DO.  (All three are Bluegrass Cellular.)

 

Geo 9 is now gone, having been merged into Geo 4.  5911 is the only roaming SID not to make the jump.  The other geos are renumbered accordingly.  (5911 is US Cellular.)

 

In the former Geo 12, now Geo 11, 193 and 318 are added.  (US Cellular and Alltel, accordingly.)

 

In the former Geo 14, now Geo 13, 4305 was increased.

 

- Trip

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the changes I see:

 

In Geo 3, the preferred roaming partners are now SIDs 6498, 21625, and 6499, with EV-DO.  (6498 is United Wireless, 6499 is Nex-Tech Wireless.  21625 isn't in the list I have.)

 

In Geo 4, Sprint native service now includes SIDs 4166 and 22424, the roaming priority of 4305 was increased, and 1211/1465/6488/152 were added.  (See Geo 9 below.)

 

In Geo 5, 1382 and 1996 were added as preferred roaming partners.  (C-Spire.)

 

In Geo 6, 4305 was increased, but also added to roaming are 264/1394/2094/113.  2094 comes with EV-DO.  (113 is Verizon, 264/1394 is C-Spire, 2094 is not in my list.  4305 is SI Wireless.)

 

In Geo 7, 4305 was increased, but 1280/6490/6492 were added.  All three come with EV-DO.  (All three are Bluegrass Cellular.)

 

Geo 9 is now gone, having been merged into Geo 4.  5911 is the only roaming SID not to make the jump.  The other geos are renumbered accordingly.  (5911 is US Cellular.)

 

In the former Geo 12, now Geo 11, 193 and 318 are added.  (US Cellular and Alltel, accordingly.)

 

In the former Geo 14, now Geo 13, 4305 was increased.

 

- Trip

 

thanks for the great work.

 

sorry for the dumb question, but how do you know geo your market is in?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the changes I see:

 

In Geo 3, the preferred roaming partners are now SIDs 6498, 21625, and 6499, with EV-DO.  (6498 is United Wireless, 6499 is Nex-Tech Wireless.  21625 isn't in the list I have.)

 

In Geo 4, Sprint native service now includes SIDs 4166 and 22424, the roaming priority of 4305 was increased, and 1211/1465/6488/152 were added.  (See Geo 9 below.)

 

In Geo 5, 1382 and 1996 were added as preferred roaming partners.  (C-Spire.)

 

In Geo 6, 4305 was increased, but also added to roaming are 264/1394/2094/113.  2094 comes with EV-DO.  (113 is Verizon, 264/1394 is C-Spire, 2094 is not in my list.  4305 is SI Wireless.)

 

In Geo 7, 4305 was increased, but 1280/6490/6492 were added.  All three come with EV-DO.  (All three are Bluegrass Cellular.)

 

Geo 9 is now gone, having been merged into Geo 4.  5911 is the only roaming SID not to make the jump.  The other geos are renumbered accordingly.  (5911 is US Cellular.)

 

In the former Geo 12, now Geo 11, 193 and 318 are added.  (US Cellular and Alltel, accordingly.)

 

In the former Geo 14, now Geo 13, 4305 was increased.

 

- Trip

Is this from PRL 55052 or PRL 54052? I've noticed one of my friends with an andriod got 55052 while it seems that iPhone users received 54052...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55052. From the file provided by UPdownLoAD.

 

- Trip

I don't think there's a way for me to get 54052 off my iPhone...did any one else get 54052 that would be so kind as to upload it so we could figure out the differences?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for the great work.

 

sorry for the dumb question, but how do you know geo your market is in?

This is the best I can find. http://prl.digiblur.com/Sprint_55021.txt

Take note that there is some changes since that PRL from 11/10/2014

 

If I search for "4120"(1X 1900) or "22407"(1X 800) (SIDs for DFW and East Texas) I find it is in geo 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...