Jump to content

Google announces Project Fi: Partners with Sprint and T-Mobile for Network Access (previous title: Google to start it's own Wireless Service; using T-Mobile/Sprint for it's Network Footprint.)


IamMrFamous07

Recommended Posts

This ensures I won't be be trying this out. Google Voice is something I'm not willing to give up, it's too bad they couldn't make them compatible.

I'm really surprised by the Google Voice incompatibility and feel the same way in that it's a deal killer.

 

I average 4GB/month on SERO Premium anyway so it's unlikely I'd be able to save money without making a significant effort to reduce data consumption.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 CAF using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully Fi will encourage Sprint to push out VoLTE faster for seamless handoffs. Any updates on VoLTE by any chance?

Sprint is not gonna push out volte till they get 800mhz lte everywhere because there's no seemless fallback to 3G voice like for TMO, att.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if FI is replacing voice, what features of voice aren't included in FI? I just use voice for my voicemail.

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't understand the FI's coverage map. Looks like AT&T is being used in some states for roaming but most of the state of MT is no coverage? AT&T covers MT well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't understand the FI's coverage map. Looks like AT&T is being used in some states for roaming but most of the state of MT is no coverage? AT&T covers MT well..

If AT&T is more expensive, Google may be holding off on any MT coverage knowing that both Tmo and Sprint coverage is imminent. Sprint is going statewide in Montana with Project Cedar, installing NV on Chinook Wireless sites. And Tmo is making a move in Western Montana using newly acquired 700-A assets it purchased.

 

Using Moto X² on Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint is not gonna push out volte till they get 800mhz lte everywhere because there's no seemless fallback to 3G voice like for TMO, att.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Why no fallback to 3G voice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDMA and lte are not inherently compatible.

The upgrade path for CDMA operators was supposed to be Ultra Mobile Broadband not lte.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

But Verizon is falling back to 3G from VoLTE, aren't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Your call will drop. And you'll have to redial.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

They could use some over-the-top solutions. a.k.a Republic Wireless fallback

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was playing around with the pricing sliders and something caught my attention -- if you only want to pay for what you use, then sign up for a 1GB plan. Any overage will be billed the same way the refunds are handled, at the ~$0.01/MB rate. Your monthly plan cost will stay fixed at $30 for the Fi basics ($20) and 1GB of data ($10; which, as far as I know, is required to have a Fi plan). Use less than 1GB, and you get money back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was playing around with the pricing sliders and something caught my attention -- if you only want to pay for what you use, then sign up for a 1GB plan. Any overage will be billed the same way the refunds are handled, at the ~$0.01/MB rate. Your monthly plan cost will stay fixed at $30 for the Fi basics ($20) and 1GB of data ($10; which, as far as I know, is required to have a Fi plan). Use less than 1GB, and you get money back.

Is there a family plan option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are no family plan options. That is why everyone hates the pricing.

 

I don't hate GoogleFi's pricing because of not having a family plan. I'm disappointed because the pricing per gb is so expensive, at $10 for every 1gb.

 

Google has decided to use both Sprint's network and T-Mobile's network, yet they price the data so high, purposely aiming their service to people who mainly use wifi. So, it doesn't end up making much sense. Why bother using two wireless networks together to create one really awesome network system for Google's service, when they are trying to limit the usage of that system, in favor of using wifi? The per gb data pricing is more expensive than Verizon's promotional per gb data pricing together with the 1st line included overall. 

 

Google ought to have charged $5 per gb. Then they'd have something to really enjoy. Right now, only wealthy people can find value in what they are charging which might make it worth for them to drop AT&T and Verizon for, though only if they like the Nexus 6. I figure they likely have either an Apple Iphone 6plus 128gb, or some custom phone company that wouldn't work with Google's wireless service anyways.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Google has decided to use both Sprint's network and T-Mobile's network, yet they price the data so high, purposely aiming their service to people who mainly use wifi. So, it doesn't end up making much sense. Why bother using two wireless networks together to create one really awesome network system for Google's service, when they are trying to limit the usage of that system, in favor of using wifi?

 

this.

 

I expect it is mostly to not scare away the carriers, however.

 

Even at $5/gb, that's 10 gig for $50 (not including the additional "the basics" charge @ $20), that's still more expensive than an iphone $50 unlimited plan or regular $60 android unlimited plan.

 

$50 (20+30) for 3 gig is simply laughable.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this.

 

I expect it is mostly to not scare away the carriers, however.

 

Even at $5/gb, that's 10 gig for $50 (not including the additional "the basics" charge @ $20), that's still more expensive than an iphone $50 unlimited plan or regular $60 android unlimited plan.

 

$50 (20+30) for 3 gig is simply laughable.

 

It's not totally lauhgable.

Cricket - ATT - gives you 2.5GB for $35 (with autopay) but you don't get international 256kbps, speeds limited to 8mbps.

 

For most people, it's laughable but for someone who travels - a lot - internationally it'd make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if they added AT&T LTE service to this, or Verizon, and it would not be laughable anymore.  I still don't think $10/gig is outrageous.  It's just not competitive with discount plans or special unlimited offers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And if they added AT&T LTE service to this, or Verizon, and it would not be laughable anymore. I still don't think $10/gig is outrageous. It's just not competitive with discount plans or special unlimited offers.

I would pay big money to a company that would offer a sim that could hop between Verizon, ATT, Sprint, T-Mobile, and US Cellular. I realize that will probably never happen...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would pay big money to a company that would offer a sim that could hop between Verizon, ATT, Sprint, T-Mobile, and US Cellular. I realize that will probably never happen...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

The problem with this is the people in the industry that say NEVER.....To be innovative and to move forward, they should never say never! Use it as a co-opetition! This should happen!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would pay big money to a company that would offer a sim that could hop between Verizon, ATT, Sprint, T-Mobile, and US Cellular. I realize that will probably never happen...

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I'm sure it could happen, but it would be damn expensive. You would be paying for network expenses of all four carriers if you wanted seamless roaming of some sort. Something more realistic might be a SIM that gives access to those networks, with an account you add money to and a different per gigabyte price depending on the network you're on and an app to track what you've used on each network, along with being able to prioritize service quality or service cost.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google has decided to use both Sprint's network and T-Mobile's network, yet they price the data so high, purposely aiming their service to people who mainly use wifi. So, it doesn't end up making much sense. Why bother using two wireless networks together to create one really awesome network system for Google's service, when they are trying to limit the usage of that system, in favor of using wifi? The per gb data pricing is more expensive than Verizon's promotional per gb data pricing together with the 1st line included overall. 

 

It makes perfect sense to me. The selling point of being a Sprint customer, or any carrier that isn't an MVNO, is basically two things, the availability of off network roaming and the price/GB of additional data. The logical niche for MVNOs is to have lower upfront costs, but make up the balance by making their money on marking up the data that their customers DO use.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline June 1 for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio covering 27500-28350Mhz expiring 6/8/2028. No reported sightings.  Buildout notice issue sent by FCC in March 5, 2024 https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/letterPdf/LetterPdfController?licId=4019733&letterVersionId=178&autoLetterId=13060705&letterCode=CR&radioServiceCode=UU&op=LetterPdf&licSide=Y&archive=null&letterTo=L  No soecific permits seen in a quick check of Columbus. They also have an additional 200Mhz covering at 24350-25450 Mhz and 24950-25050Mhz with no buildout date expiring 12/11/2029.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...