Jump to content

Mobilesolutions

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    1,193
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mobilesolutions

  1. HA! only 980!! I had better quit now then. The limitations of Metro fiber would mean you average less than a gigabit per second. I'd charge a lot for it & i'd be a nazi about how much data you run over it. I probably wont be doing any FTTH for a few years. I do have a feasible & economic way of doing so for most of the areas i intend to serve. I hope to fix that.
  2. Most of the iPhone users carry a potent strain of eHerpies.
  3. You will not get that on Sprint of course, even at NV completion. Probably 7-14 in Okc will be the norm for a while. This also depends on your signal values etc.
  4. Sloppiest install I see around town always ends up being Verizon.
  5. All in favor of EBS/BRS rollout say "I". A poll emerges in the Sponsor section; unanimous decision in favor of the motion and we have tri band Lte from Sprint! I like the addendum. Not so sure how Son would feel about "us" having such a large collective voice on his wireless decisions, but i think if i could talk to him i would iron out any unsettled nerves.
  6. This means to ideally supply a site with both bands of LTE would total around 260 Mbps. That sounds like the perfect world. We aren't there yet i promise. No carrier has 260mbps at even a majority of its footprint. Yes in a lot of places fiber is readily available . Sounds ideal though .
  7. It really depends on the location. In towns with many metro fiber companies it is much easier often to get large capacity to a given location; the problem comes when there is a lack of diversity for internet providers.
  8. I know some areas that are low traffic 100mbps may not be justifyable. Also some remote areas that are not microwave fed it may just not be feasible to run that capacity. And whattttttttt I hope your not paying 1400 for a 50/50 circuit. I hardly pay more than that for dedicated gigabit.
  9. I have the best sources imaginable. Yes the idea would be 100mbps at every site but its not feasible in a lot of places.
  10. Even if a site has fiber Sprint is still paying for a circuit. Usually 20/50mbps but that totally depends on the metro fiber availability.
  11. Well LTe sites are all over accepted and legacy 3G is still running along side with T1s, of course the LTe connection has fiber or microwave .
  12. So MIMO will be workable within carrier bands. And if I'm not mistaken carrier aggregation is having MIMO using connections from separate bands? Carrier aggregation is using multiple bands yes, also keep in mind that aggregate air link backhaul should also be considered as this will bolster overall capacity especially for microwave sites.
  13. If we are wanting to do an app I like the "report LTE connection" button that screenshots your engineering screen and puts a dot on the map showing some basic connection ststistics . this way its user generated and non sponsors can have a general idea of where LTe is available without seeing GPS locations for the sites. I suppose there are still some hiccups in the idea.
  14. Now that markets like Chicago are nearing ubiquitous coverage the transition into Lte advanced with 800SMR will give Sprint equal playing fields with the duopoly for indoor network coverage. Obviously 5x5 speeds are not as "fast" but this is just as large a decision based on capacity needs; of which Sprint's effective network load is under 1/2 of either AT&T or Verizon. Literally this is right around the corner for you guys Chicago is one of the first areas to see an 800 MHZ signal from Sprint and come this fall when SMR capable smartphones roll out you will be among the first to experience it first hand.
  15. Yes, the incumbent telcos & cable cos can do nothing to stop us now Yes, when consumer demand is strong the cable companies will begin sluggishly switching over to FTTH connections to the masses. Yes, there are cities with many cable companies and Fiber companies such as NYC you have mentioned. For cites like mine, residents have Cox cable or Windstream to chose from. Cox offers 60/5 in town for $85.00 per month. We lack the competition to motivate them to step up, A friend of mine recently switched to directTV and bundled with windstream with the 24mbps package windstream is unable to deliver more than 2mbps to her home. For us, without an intervention we are unlikely to ever see an affordable fiber connection. :alien:
  16. Isn't that far away? Gigabit is 10 years away from being available in MOST all the metropolitan areas. Only a small portion of internet users have any NEED for internet speeds greater than 50mbps. Of course in the future this will change.
  17. most households will have no use for gigabit fiber.
  18. "Small cells" will could potentially bridge the gap, I'm also quite aware small cells alone is not a full solution. But for a 5x5 provider it will at least offer coverage most everywhere within the macro network.
  19. no explanation, no nothing, logged on one day to find my account permanently suspended, along with my paypal account. I was a member for 4 years with a perfect feedback.
  20. I had a 300 something rating with a 100% feedback and ebay shut down my account. Screw em.
  21. I'm 20 going on 57 My time is limited
×
×
  • Create New...