Jump to content

Google Nexus 5X by LG (codename "Bullhead")


PythonFanPA

Recommended Posts

Hadn't seen anything anything on this at least in the LG subsection (if info exists elsewhere, please feel free to lock if needbe mods), but Google Now passed this my way the other day:

 

http://www.ecumenicalnews.com/article/nexus-5-2015-to-come-with-new-android-m-features-including-fingerprint-sensor-and-usb-c-port-30048

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last several weeks, the 2015 Nexus rumors are for a Huawei or Xiaomi phablet and an LG handset.  I wish that I could consider it news, but it is just widespread hearsay.

 

I also get many of the same "articles" in my Google Now feed.  It mystifies me why so many come from religious or ethnic focused sites, not tech sites.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they can make a less costly nexus 2015 , like the nexus 5. I would buy one in that case, but I can not justify paying $600+ for an overly enlarged phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still happy with my Nexus 5. It runs great and never had an issue. My only complaint would be the terrible speaker and poor camera but for the price at launch it was a great deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last several weeks, the 2015 Nexus rumors are for a Huawei or Xiaomi phablet and an LG handset.  I wish that I could consider it news, but it is just widespread hearsay.

 

I also get many of the same "articles" in my Google Now feed.  It mystifies me why so many come from religious or ethnic focused sites, not tech sites.

 

AJ

 

I couldn't find the exact article I'd seen pop up on my phone, but the initial one I read did actually reference video from the Google presentation at least plus a few references to something published on Verge and BGR I believe (not that anyone's a huge fan of the latter in particular).

 

Otherwise, I am totally with you on the whole strange trend of odd sites popping up breaking news on things AJ....from 'Christian Today' to 'Latino-(whatever)' to 'Chinatopix'....I was beginning to think I was the only person who was seeing those popping up so often, you're the first person I've seen openly commenting on it to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am still happy with my Nexus 5. It runs great and never had an issue. My only complaint would be the terrible speaker and poor camera but for the price at launch it was a great deal.

 

Overall, the best two Nexus devices were both released in 2013.  The 2013 Nexus 7 and the Nexus 5.  They continue to be competitive with or even top more recent devices.  And the Nexus devices of 2014 were, well, just weird.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall, the best two Nexus devices were both released in 2013.  The 2013 Nexus 7 and the Nexus 5.  They continue to be competitive with or even top more recent devices.  And the Nexus devices of 2014 were, well, just weird.

 

AJ

I highly agree with the Nexus 5 statement, but the Nexus 7 statement, I'm kind of on the fence. On one hand, it's definitely the best tablet that came with the Nexus name, and the Nexus 9 was just disappointing. On the other hand, my Nexus 7 has slowed down so much after Lollipop, I haven't really used it anymore.

 

I'll actually be jumping ship to the LG G4 either today or tomorrow. As much as I love my Nexus 5, its battery life is really what irks me, and LG's G series has had much better luck with battery life. Even still, I'm actually planning on keeping my Nexus 5 as a secondary device until it dies. It's just that good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly agree with the Nexus 5 statement, but the Nexus 7 statement, I'm kind of on the fence. On one hand, it's definitely the best tablet that came with the Nexus name, and the Nexus 9 was just disappointing. On the other hand, my Nexus 7 has slowed down so much after Lollipop, I haven't really used it anymore.

 

I'll actually be jumping ship to the LG G4 either today or tomorrow. As much as I love my Nexus 5, its battery life is really what irks me, and LG's G series has had much better luck with battery life. Even still, I'm actually planning on keeping my Nexus 5 as a secondary device until it dies. It's just that good.

I fell in love with my N5 all over again after getting 5.1.1 and putting in a new battery especially. The original battery was giving me only 2 hrs SOT after 18 months. With the new one in place, it's about 5 hrs SOT.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last several weeks, the 2015 Nexus rumors are for a Huawei or Xiaomi phablet and an LG handset. I wish that I could consider it news, but it is just widespread hearsay.

 

...

 

AJ

Android Police broke this story, and commits in AOSP were found by another party which reference an LG device "bullhead" (2013 Nexus 5 was "hammerhead"). So it's not just the scraper sites.

 

Edit: link http://www.androidpolice.com/2015/05/26/rumor-no-nexus-tablet-in-2015-but-two-phones-a-5-2-inch-lg-code-name-angler-and-a-5-7-inch-huawei-code-name-bullhead/

Edited by djw39
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fell in love with my N5 all over again after getting 5.1.1 and putting in a new battery especially. The original battery was giving me only 2 hrs SOT after 18 months. With the new one in place, it's about 5 hrs SOT.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Where did you get a replacement battery? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly agree with the Nexus 5 statement, but the Nexus 7 statement, I'm kind of on the fence. On one hand, it's definitely the best tablet that came with the Nexus name, and the Nexus 9 was just disappointing. On the other hand, my Nexus 7 has slowed down so much after Lollipop, I haven't really used it anymore.

 

Just curious, but are you sure you're talking about the 2013 Nexus 7 and not the 2012 version?   We have a 2012 version and its been kind of hit and miss on the performance, though it improved with the latest 5.1 push from the original 5.0.x versions.  From what I'd read, the 2013 N7 wasn't affected quite as acutely - and that's the version AJ was referencing in his post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did you get a replacement battery?

From Amazon, through the seller Shine-E. Battery manuf date was December 2014, so pretty new. I put it in in April and it's still going great, about 4.5 hrs of SOT.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Amazon, through the seller Shine-E. Battery manuf date was December 2014, so pretty new. I put it in in April and it's still going great, about 4.5 hrs of SOT.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I did the same thing with my G2.  Replaced the battery after 1.5 years.  Noticeable difference, although not quite as major of a difference as your experience.  Embedded batteries are very tedious to swap out, though.  Basically taking your phone apart and putting it back together just to swap the battery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just curious, but are you sure you're talking about the 2013 Nexus 7 and not the 2012 version?   We have a 2012 version and its been kind of hit and miss on the performance, though it improved with the latest 5.1 push from the original 5.0.x versions.  From what I'd read, the 2013 N7 wasn't affected quite as acutely - and that's the version AJ was referencing in his post.

I'm definitely talking about the 2013 Nexus 7. The 2012 Nexus 7 was much worse, from what I heard, but it doesn't mean that the Nexus 7 2013 wasn't badly affected.

 

Edit: And I'm not suggesting this is happening to everyone. I have another friend who has a Nexus 7 2013, and he also said he was enjoying Lollipop on it. My Nexus 7, however, is shared between my girlfriend and me, and both of us agree that it is much worse than when it had 4.4 or 4.3.

Edited by metayoshi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fell in love with my N5 all over again after getting 5.1.1 and putting in a new battery especially. The original battery was giving me only 2 hrs SOT after 18 months. With the new one in place, it's about 5 hrs SOT.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

As comfortable as I am messing with software like ROMs and using command lines (I am a firmware engineer by profession), and as comfortable as I am installing new RAM or a new HDD/SSD in a laptop or building a new desktop from scratch, I am just not comfortable popping open a phone that's not meant to be popped open by a normal consumer. That's just me. If you're fine and happy going that route, all the power to you, and I'm glad you're able to squeeze more life into the device.

 

As I've said before, it's a great device. And even though I now have a G4, I am definitely keeping the Nexus 5 for messing around with (I already installed the Android M preview as soon as my G4 was loaded with every app I frequently use). I'm hoping the next Nexus 5 is going to be just as good for anyone going that route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm definitely talking about the 2013 Nexus 7. The 2012 Nexus 7 was much worse, from what I heard, but it doesn't mean that the Nexus 7 2013 wasn't badly affected.

 

Edit: And I'm not suggesting this is happening to everyone. I have another friend who has a Nexus 7 2013, and he also said he was enjoying Lollipop on it. My Nexus 7, however, is shared between my girlfriend and me, and both of us agree that it is much worse than when it had 4.4 or 4.3.

 

Understood, and I certainly wasn't trying to suggest that the 2013 version had no issues either - just that my understanding was that there was a definite difference between the two in terms of how they'd handled the upgrade. 

 

I can certainly corroborate that there were no performance issues with the 2012 version on KitKat, and I certainly wouldn't say there are no issues now on 5.1 either - there's still lag/hesitations off and on- just that there was a noticeable improvement over the comparatively abysmal experience with the 5.0.x versions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As comfortable as I am messing with software like ROMs and using command lines (I am a firmware engineer by profession), and as comfortable as I am installing new RAM or a new HDD/SSD in a laptop or building a new desktop from scratch, I am just not comfortable popping open a phone that's not meant to be popped open by a normal consumer. That's just me. If you're fine and happy going that route, all the power to you, and I'm glad you're able to squeeze more life into the device.

 

As I've said before, it's a great device. And even though I now have a G4, I am definitely keeping the Nexus 5 for messing around with (I already installed the Android M preview as soon as my G4 was loaded with every app I frequently use). I'm hoping the next Nexus 5 is going to be just as good for anyone going that route.

I'm not even in the software or hardware industry - I work at CVS pharmacy counting pills! - and it was pretty easy swapping out the battery? XD

 

I have plenty experience, though, building my own rigs & disassembling laptops for CPU swap, thermal paste reapplication, and heatsink & fan replacement.

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not even in the software or hardware industry - I work at CVS pharmacy counting pills! - and it was pretty easy swapping out the battery? XD

 

I have plenty experience, though, building my own rigs & disassembling laptops for CPU swap, thermal paste reapplication, and heatsink & fan replacement.

 

Sent from my SM-G925P using Tapatalk

Yeah, you do a lot of aftermarket stuff like disassembling laptops and doing thermal paste reapplication. When I build PCs, I'm a stock everything guy. I don't overclock anything or use aftermarket cooling. I'm too afraid of breaking my things even though I know other people do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think many of you guys are too OS update happy.  My 2013 Nexus 7 is still running Jelly Bean and doing just dandy.  Why fix what is not broken?  If I want Lollipop, it will come with my next handset or tablet.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As comfortable as I am messing with software like ROMs and using command lines (I am a firmware engineer by profession), and as comfortable as I am installing new RAM or a new HDD/SSD in a laptop or building a new desktop from scratch, I am just not comfortable popping open a phone that's not meant to be popped open by a normal consumer. That's just me. If you're fine and happy going that route, all the power to you, and I'm glad you're able to squeeze more life into the device.

 

As I've said before, it's a great device. And even though I now have a G4, I am definitely keeping the Nexus 5 for messing around with (I already installed the Android M preview as soon as my G4 was loaded with every app I frequently use). I'm hoping the next Nexus 5 is going to be just as good for anyone going that route.

 

On a lot of phones where you are dealing with tons of adhesive (say HTC M8/M9) I get it... but on a nexus 5 - it's basically user accessible.  I wouldn't clump all sealed phones in the same boat.  If you can build a desktop from scratch, opening a Nexus 5 is about 1000x easier.

 

Don't be scared, the Nexus 5 doesn't bite :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think many of you guys are too OS update happy.  My 2013 Nexus 7 is still running Jelly Bean and doing just dandy.  Why fix what is not broken?  If I want Lollipop, it will come with my next handset or tablet.

 

AJ

In my opinion, to each their own. Some people like to update, some people don't. That's fine. And to answer the question, "Why fix what isn't broken?" Major OS updates is rarely about fixing what's broken anyway. It's about getting new features, and unfortunately, that comes with bugs or useful features taken out if the developer is not smart enough to realize.

 

Otherwise, most of the time, new OS versions come with great benefits. The update from Eclair to Froyo, for example, added their just in time compiler for better performance. Gingerbread to Ice Cream Sandwich unified the phone and tablet UIs and is essentially the major layout we see today. Jelly Bean brought Project Butter in 4.1, Android native quick settings in the notification shade in 4.2, and NAND TRIM support for performance consistency in 4.3. KitKat brought down the requirements so that lower end phones in emerging markets can run Android. Even Lollipop, with all its bugs, finalized ART, which was supposed to increase performance, and improved little things like the quick settings menu in the notification shade.

 

In the end, it all depends on whether the owner of the device wants to upgrade or not. If you want to stay on an older firmware, that's perfectly ok. Just like how it's perfectly ok for people to upgrade if they want to. It's not really the user's fault if they run into bugs. it's on the entity providing those updates, whether that's Google, the OEM, or the network carrier. These buggy releases shouldn't be going out in the first place.

 

On a lot of phones where you are dealing with tons of adhesive (say HTC M8/M9) I get it... but on a nexus 5 - it's basically user accessible.  I wouldn't clump all sealed phones in the same boat.  If you can build a desktop from scratch, opening a Nexus 5 is about 1000x easier.

 

Don't be scared, the Nexus 5 doesn't bite :)

Again, to this, to each their own. I'm just not comfortable opening something that's not meant to be opened, whether it's easy or not. I'm perfectly happy with upgrading to my LG G4, just like how you're perfectly happy with staying with your Nexus 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hoping that the rumors are true about a Nexus 5 (2015) with a 5.2 in screen.  It will be awesome if it can maintain the screen size as my LG G2.  Hoping it will be packed with a USB Type-C port and quad HD screen.  A fingerprint sensor would be nice to really get Android Pay up and running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hoping that the rumors are true about a Nexus 5 (2015) with a 5.2 in screen. It will be awesome if it can maintain the screen size as my LG G2. Hoping it will be packed with a USB Type-C port and quad HD screen. A fingerprint sensor would be nice to really get Android Pay up and running.

I agree with everything except quad HD. I think the whole quad HD thing is very overrun rated for such a small device and I'd prefer battery life over any negligible screen size changes especially if it comes also with a performance hit.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...