Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Utah Market (Salt Lake City/Ogden/Provo/St. George/Cedar City)


Rafaelcab

Recommended Posts

Sorry, poorly worded. In the past it was connecting to cell ID 87 in hyrum. But yesterday I picked up LTE and noticed the new one - 400.

That's what I assumed but just wanted clarification.

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's probably the tower west of town, it went live on Friday

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

Good to know, hopefully they do the tower downtown. Although it's nice to be getting lte on main street, east of it between 4th and 14th north is like a black hole for decent service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When will all the sites in Utah County be lit up with LTE?

Utah county has a ton of LTE sites already lit up.  Even on sprints coverage map it shows that LTE is live with coverage in Utah County because coverage is pretty decent down there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When will all the sites in Utah County be lit up with LTE?

As stated above, but to clairify a bit more. All sites are upgraded in Utah county, just waiting on backhual on the remaining. They continue to light up sites weekly. Make a donation and you will see a lot more information and it greatly helps keep the site going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to know, hopefully they do the tower downtown. Although it's nice to be getting lte on main street, east of it between 4th and 14th north is like a black hole for decent service.

Actually I think I was wrong, I'm pretty sure that the new LTE tower IS the downtown one. I believe the tower west of town is still 3g.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Spark devices have received their updates except for the N5. We are waiting on Google for that.

Well the iPhone 5 is still waiting to be able to use 800 voice and from what I've read in other forums the 5s hasn't been able to connect to b26 or 800 voice where available.  So those phones are still waiting on those as well.

Edit: I do understand though that they aren't "spark" devices

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the iPhone 5 is still waiting to be able to use 800 voice and from what I've read in other forums the 5s hasn't been able to connect to b26 or 800 voice where available. So those phones are still waiting on those as well.

Edit: I do understand though that they aren't "spark" devices

We have had lots of members use both CDMA 800 and Band 26 LTE on the iPhone 5s. In fact, for the first few weeks it seemed only the 5s could connect to B26. Android devices seemed to not be able to initially.

 

Additionally, the iPhone 5s will not even scan CDMA channels on 800 unless there is absolutely positively no 1900 available.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have had lots of members use both CDMA 800 and Band 26 LTE on the iPhone 5s. In fact, for the first few weeks it seemed only the 5s could connect to B26. Android devices seemed to not be able to initially.

 

Additionally, the iPhone 5s will not even scan CDMA channels on 800 unless there is absolutely positively no 1900 available.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Well thats a positive sign.  Good to know!!  I guess its just the iPhone 5 now that for some reason isn't picking up CDMA 800.  I know for me personally on the iPhone 5 I will roam and then lose service and still not pick up CDMA 800.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well thats a positive sign.  Good to know!!  I guess its just the iPhone 5 now that for some reason isn't picking up CDMA 800.  I know for me personally on the iPhone 5 I will roam and then lose service and still not pick up CDMA 800.

 

where are you roaming? A lot of the sites further out may not have 800 yet because they are gmos.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

where are you roaming? A lot of the sites further out may not have 800 yet because they are gmos.

I'm not by any gmos.  I'm surrounded by cdma 800 sites.  I'm roaming in ogden and south ogden.  There are places in washington terrace I will be roaming as well.  Keep in mind I am roaming in buildings not out in the open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be a dumb post but I saw this at the nearest tower just today and it looks promising. I'm not sure what it is and I thought you guys could clarify for me. If needed I can get better close up pics. I'm a little confused though because when I took the picture I had my phone on LTE only mode and it was picking up LTE. I only assumed it was for the phone tower because it was right next to it. 

cHI83j3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be a dumb post but I saw this at the nearest tower just today and it looks promising. I'm not sure what it is and I thought you guys could clarify for me. If needed I can get better close up pics. I'm a little confused though because when I took the picture I had my phone on LTE only mode and it was picking up LTE. I only assumed it was for the phone tower because it was right next to it. 

 

 

That's definitely a new NV cabinet. You're likely picking up LTE from another tower in the area.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's definitely a new NV cabinet. You're likely picking up LTE from another tower in the area.

I'm not too surprised because I am able to pick up a strong 4G signal as I drive up and down Mountain View Corridor. I was going to talk to the business owner that this tower is located on and see if I can get some more info. Even with this tower not done, I'm able to pick up a little 4G in my neighborhood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

When will Vernal, Utah be getting 4G ? We have had 3G forever, all the other companies have 4G here.

 

A sprint employee told me June/July of 2014. I have no idea if it's true or not though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When will Vernal, Utah be getting 4G ? We have had 3G forever, all the other companies have 4G here.

 

A sprint employee told me June/July of 2014. I have no idea if it's true or not though.

Sprint employees see a general schedule which I believe generally has a 90 day window so don't get over excited for that date.

 

Sent from my CoziBlurred4.3 gN2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...