Jump to content

AT&T roaming prioritized over Sprint coverage after PRL update.


Risc

Recommended Posts

Last week a coworker was complaining about roaming in our office after doing a PRL update. Service in our building isn't the best but I can usually hold on to a 3G connection and even the occasional B26 LTE. I decided to do a PRL update as well just to see if it was an isolated incident, it wasn't. As far as I can tell our phones are now prioritizing a roaming AT&T LTE connection over Sprint 3G. As soon as I drop Sprint LTE it jumps to AT&T. The only way to get back to Sprint 3G is to switch my phone to CDMA mode. Also this is not limited to my office. I haven't done a ton of traveling over the past few days but any time I would normally drop to 3G I am roaming.  Anyone have any thoughts? Obviously Sprint support was less than helpful, they said it was probably a tower issue but as I said its not just one location and I can force my phone to 3G. Personally I wouldn't care except that roaming data is so limited, slow data is better than no data.

att.jpg

sprint.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen this in Shentel territory a few months ago. Standing next to a 3g only site yet being on AT&T LTE at 3g speeds. Seems to be a bit expensive. 3G only phone used site a hundred feet away.

Last week a coworker was complaining about roaming in our office after doing a PRL update. Service in our building isn't the best but I can usually hold on to a 3G connection and even the occasional B26 LTE. I decided to do a PRL update as well just to see if it was an isolated incident, it wasn't. As far as I can tell our phones are now prioritizing a roaming AT&T LTE connection over Sprint 3G. As soon as I drop Sprint LTE it jumps to AT&T. The only way to get back to Sprint 3G is to switch my phone to CDMA mode. Also this is not limited to my office. I haven't done a ton of traveling over the past few days but any time I would normally drop to 3G I am roaming.  Anyone have any thoughts? Obviously Sprint support was less than helpful, they said it was probably a tower issue but as I said its not just one location and I can force my phone to 3G. Personally I wouldn't care except that roaming data is so limited, slow data is better than no data.
att.thumb.jpg.2b413b90938c264cd38c1f20191edaf4.jpg
sprint.thumb.jpg.66e7f0efce6e0842c319be93f9505103.jpg


Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, red_dog007 said:

Is there carrier to carrier VoLTE handoff?

I believe this is what they are attempting. 

2 hours ago, Risc said:

I decided to do a PRL update as well just to see if it was an isolated incident, it wasn't. As far as I can tell our phones are now prioritizing a roaming AT&T LTE connection over Sprint 3G. 

What PRL/carrier version are you on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This happened to me last week in my home. I usually have a weak to very marginal B26 in my home. I occasionally drop to EVDO. I noticed last Friday I believe that after I dropped to EVDO I latched onto AT&T roaming. I toggled airplane mode and got Sprint LTE back for a moment, but as soon as I dropped to EVDO again, I latched onto AT&T roaming again, even while having a Sprint 1x signal. I did report the problem to Sprint, though I didn't think to check the PRL. 

I noticed this over the weekend as well when I was in a very low signal area for Sprint. I had a weak Sprint B26 signal, then dropped to EVDO and suddenly I was on AT&T LTE. 

My PRL is 55069.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds like a mistake on Sprint's end or a weird way to try and force people off of CDMA. Maybe it was a PRL meant for internal testing of VoLTE roaming that got pushed out to everyone by accident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RAvirani said:

Very interesting. Does the device jump back to Sprint LTE when it is available? And if so, aggressively or not?

It does, but not very aggressively. For example, on Saturday when I was in a low signal area, I know that B26 was available, however the phone held onto B2/4 AT&T until I toggled airplane mode. Then it would find the B26 signal. But as soon as I slipped down to EVDO, AT&T LTE would show up again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

This sounds like a mistake on Sprint's end or a weird way to try and force people off of CDMA. Maybe it was a PRL meant for internal testing of VoLTE roaming that got pushed out to everyone by accident.

It could have helped them with % of time on LTE in Carrier comparison stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dkoellerwx said:

Got a call from Sprint executive support. 

Any details you can share?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dkyeager said:

Any details you can share?

Tech was looking at towers for problems. I explained multiple times that it seemed more like a network/PRL issue pushing devices to LTE roaming instead of letting them stay on EVDO. Didn't get too far, calling back tomorrow at 1pm CDT to get an advanced tech person on the call.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed a bit over a week ago that I briefly switched to att LTE roaming in Berkeley, CA in a weak area. I thought it was just an odd fluke.

It would make sense that this is a way to make VoLTE much more reliable. And perhaps they'll prioritize T-Mobile roaming (and maybe not have it count towards roaming allotment?). Ideally they'd be able to make it skip Sprint 3G only if on a call rather than all the time, to avoid using up your roaming allowance needlessly (and since LTE roaming is throttled slower than 3G).

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ingenium said:

I noticed a bit over a week ago that I briefly switched to att LTE roaming in Berkeley, CA in a weak area. I thought it was just an odd fluke.

It would make sense that this is a way to make VoLTE much more reliable. And perhaps they'll prioritize T-Mobile roaming (and maybe not have it count towards roaming allotment?). Ideally they'd be able to make it skip Sprint 3G only if on a call rather than all the time, to avoid using up your roaming allowance needlessly (and since LTE roaming is throttled slower than 3G).

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

I read somewhere that T-Mobile roaming was supposed to kick in when you lost Sprint LTE, and not when you fully lost Sprint signal like with other roaming. Perhaps this was an attempt at that but accidentally pushed to AT&T instead of T-Mobile. 

Also, T-Mobile is supposed to be Extended LTE, meaning counts as native data, no hard roaming cap.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that T-Mobile roaming was supposed to kick in when you lost Sprint LTE, and not when you fully lost Sprint signal like with other roaming. Perhaps this was an attempt at that but accidentally pushed to AT&T instead of T-Mobile. 
Also, T-Mobile is supposed to be Extended LTE, meaning counts as native data, no hard roaming cap.
If that's true, then this makes perfect sense. Maybe someone jumped the gun and rolled it out before T-Mobile roaming was flipped on. I don't believe it's active anywhere currently.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ingenium said:

If that's true, then this makes perfect sense. Maybe someone jumped the gun and rolled it out before T-Mobile roaming was flipped on. I don't believe it's active anywhere currently.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
 

I believe target is on or around Aug. 1st to coincide with the earnings call. Or at least that's the hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been able to recreate the issue several times tonight. If I force my phone into a low signal area and get it to drop to EVDO for at least a minute, it will switch to LTE roaming. Currently bouncing between AT&T B4 and B17. Coming back to an area that has Sprint signal, I am not switching back over yet. 

What doesn't make sense to me is that USCC has coverage here. Wouldn't that be above AT&T when it comes to roaming? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this did become a thing, I think 256Kbps w/ soft data cap on AT&T, would be a solid way to migrate off PCS 3G.  

I wonder why Sprint is only doing this with AT&T and not VZW.  I know AT&T could have just given them a better deal, or allowed them to do it at all.  I wonder if a previous merger acquisition favored Sprint here at all when they inquired AT&T about services. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is in preparation for the T-Mobile roaming that's supposed to be active pretty soon. T-Mobile LTE will be a higher priority than all the other roaming networks so in ideal circumstances, your phone would switch to T-Mobile LTE if there is no native LTE signal available.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know what you're all talking about.  :lol: AT&T roaming doesn't exist here,  and VZW roaming only allows phone calls.  It's why I got the el-cheapo FP AT&T sim.  It's my defacto LTE roaming in every sense (only 250MB allotment too) except for maybe speeds.  I just burn through it even faster. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Excuse my rookie comments here, but after enabling *#73#, it seems that the rainbow sim V2? requires n70 (I turned it off along with n71 - was hoping to track n66) to be available else it switches to T-Mobile.  So this confirms my suspicion that you need to be close to a site to get on Dish.  Have no idea why they don't just use plmn. To test, I put it into a s21 ultra, rebooted twice, came up on T-Mobile (no n70 on s21).  Tried to manually register on 313340, but it did not connect (tried twice). I am on factory unlocked firmware but used a s22 hack to get *#73# working.  Tried what you were suggesting with a T-Mobile sim partially installed, but that was very unstable with Dish ( I think they had figured that one out).  [edit: and now I see Boost sent me a successful device swap notice which says I can now begin to use my new device.  Sigh.  Will try again later and wait for this message - too impatient.]
    • Hopefully this indicates T-Mobile hasn't completely abandoned mmwave and/or small cells? But then again this is the loop, so take that as you will. Hopefully now that most macro activity is done (besides rural colo/builds), they will start working on small cells.   
    • This has been approved.. https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fcc-approves-t-mobiles-deal-to-purchase-mint-mobile/  
    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). They do have a reserve level. Nationwide 800Mhz is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  T-Mobile did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, FWA Mobile in RVs in Walmart parking lots working where mobile phones need all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71, 90% 5g.  93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77 also with its shorter range.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...