Jump to content

Major coverage map update 2016/01/10


JWMaloney

Recommended Posts

Old map data courtesy of dsatrbs posted to /r/sprint:

https://mega.nz/#!dcJEjRJS!2olvjpP-E699qe-bIENZykrfGtPKt8HdhNpSFfTMiTo

 

They also posted t-mobile tilesets and did a comparison map.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sprint/comments/3y546q/tmobile_1115_to_1215_bonus_sprint_maps/

 

(edit: They aren't very zoomed in, but maybe you can compare larger differences.)

Edited by luvixuha
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice these black dots are appearing in Albuquerque with the latest update. Anyone know what these mean?

 

Qamw248.png

From what I can tell from looking at my market, it looks like they are sprint stores although I may be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I can tell from looking at my market, it looks like they are sprint stores although I may be wrong.

No they are just general landmarks like shopping or sports complexs etc....

 

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed this in the Pittsburgh market for a new LTE and B41 site. Other markets such as Columbus were unchanged.

 

If your market coverage map has changed I urge you to look carefully for new sites!

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope they looked into el paso tx while updating the map. Hope they saw that we need b41

 

El Paso may continue to be a pain point.  Because of Mexico, Sprint presently cannot run band 26.  Sprint lacks adequate spectrum there to run a band 25 second carrier.  And El Paso is/was a WiMAX license protection market.  You may be stuck with what you have for the next year or so.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Paso may continue to be a pain point. Because of Mexico, Sprint presently cannot run band 26. Sprint lacks adequate spectrum there to run a band 25 second carrier. And El Paso is/was a WiMAX license protection market. You may be stuck with what you have for the next year or so.

 

AJ

That's what I've seen in my research. We had about 5 towers that had wimax on it but that's about it.... el paso is really struggling with just the 5×5 bandwidth on band 25..... this year alone we are up to over 800 thouand population.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I've seen in my research. We had about 5 towers that had wimax on it but that's about it.... el paso is really struggling with just the 5×5 bandwidth on band 25..... this year alone we are up to over 800 thouand population.

 

Yeah, you were not far off.  In our sponsor section, we have maps of all Clearwire sites.  El Paso has/had three WiMAX license protection sites.  Band 41 also can be added to full build Network Vision sites, but there is no guarantee.  Right now, El Paso just is not a priority market.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, you were not far off. In our sponsor section, we have maps of all Clearwire sites. El Paso has/had three WiMAX license protection sites. Band 41 also can be added to full build Network Vision sites, but there is no guarantee. Right now, El Paso just is not a priority market.

 

AJ

I wonder why... we are a lower budget city. So the 50% off here would be a huge hit. But the towers can't handle many more people on it...its starting to get to the point..... where dropped and delayed text messages are starting to become a issue again just like on the legacy sites.

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And our signal strength is on average higher then it needs to be.... so i assum there is a lot of gaps between towers.

 

That also may be to combat the Mexican operators.  They are notorious for spilling signal over the border, potentially trying to grab roaming traffic.  A border town is a less than ideal place to be for wireless, unfortunately.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That also may be to combat the Mexican operators. They are notorious for spilling signal over the border, potentially trying to grab roaming traffic. A border town is a less than ideal place to be for wireless, unfortunately.

 

AJ

I mean i have other options. Verizon performs great here. Full xlte and 700 mhz. At&t great signal strenght penetrates well. Tmobile just passed at&t in network speeds. But all my money is tied into sprint

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Paso may continue to be a pain point. Because of Mexico, Sprint presently cannot run band 26. Sprint lacks adequate spectrum there to run a band 25 second carrier. And El Paso is/was a WiMAX license protection market. You may be stuck with what you have for the next year or so.

 

AJ

But even the year or so....is not a guarantee for el paso to even get band 41... im not even expecting lte plus lol

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But even the year or so....is not a guarantee for el paso to even get band 41... im not even expecting lte plus lol

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

Once Band 41 goes in, it will most likely go live with 2 carriers and carrier aggregation (LTE Plus). I would wager that installs start within a year. Even by summer. Though I don't have any inside info to back that up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once Band 41 goes in, it will most likely go live with 2 carriers and carrier aggregation (LTE Plus). I would wager that installs start within a year. Even by summer. Though I don't have any inside info to back that up.

Im hoping, but in my research that i have seen sprint can't aggregate unless band 26 is present correct me if im wrong. El paso is a top 100 market according to number so i don't see why we wouldn't be a priority

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im hoping, but in my research that i have seen sprint can't aggregate unless band 26 is present correct me if im wrong. El paso is a top 100 market according to number so i don't see why we wouldn't be a priority

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

Very wrong. Band 41 carrier aggregation is not dependent on Band 26 at all. There is no 25+25, 25+26, 25+41, 26+41 carrier aggregation, only 41+41. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very wrong. Band 41 carrier aggregation is not dependent on Band 26 at all. There is no 25+25, 25+26, 25+41, 26+41 carrier aggregation, only 41+41.

Perfect great to know..... so this is all really a toss to when sprint will try to get band 41 here. There are much smaller markets in Tx such as amarillo, odessa midland, Lubbock that have band 41.... i really wonder why we don't

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im hoping, but in my research that i have seen sprint can't aggregate unless band 26 is present correct me if im wrong. El paso is a top 100 market according to number so i don't see why we wouldn't be a priority

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Carrier aggregation on band 41 has nothing to do with Band 26, but I see I was beaten to it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect great to know..... so this is all really a toss to when sprint will try to get band 41 here. There are much smaller markets in Tx such as amarillo, odessa midland, Lubbock that have band 41.... i really wonder why we don't

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

It's done on a market by market basis (Sprint market, not cities). For example, the Oklahoma market has not started B41 deployment yet either. That includes Oklahoma City and Tulsa. The Albuquerque market (includes most of New Mexico, and El Paso) has not started deployment. The Oklahoma and Albuquerque markets are considered tertiary markets, and thus are much lower on the priority list.

 

See this post for a map of Sprint markets: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/page/index.html/_/articles/nationwide-sprint-market-map-is-here-r31

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's done on a market by market basis (Sprint market, not cities). For example, the Oklahoma market has not started B41 deployment yet either. That includes Oklahoma City and Tulsa. The Albuquerque market (includes most of New Mexico, and El Paso) has not started deployment. The Oklahoma and Albuquerque markets are considered tertiary markets, and thus are much lower on the priority list.

 

See this post for a map of Sprint markets: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/page/index.html/_/articles/nationwide-sprint-market-map-is-here-r31

I see that makes sense...... i really hope it's soon, because band 25 is struggling very bad!

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

link was corrected, somehow got the wrong text in there!

 

Damn, I was all ready to go skiing.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...