Jump to content

Outdoor WiFi


cdk

Recommended Posts

My current home wifi router works great in the house, however the signal dies fairly quickly when I am outside. What are my options for providing a usable signal outdoors on my property?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on the size of the property. I live on an acre of land and have a Linksys E1200 and have coverage to about 75% of my yard. Of course, my walls on my house are pretty thin, so that may help my case.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My current home wifi router works great in the house, however the signal dies fairly quickly when I am outside. What are my options for providing a usable signal outdoors on my property?

Depends on how big your outside is.

 

Easiest solution if you have a small outdoor area is to mount a wireless router near a window and set it as a wireless access point.

 

If you have a bigger outdoor area and you want to cover it you'll need to set up a higher powered wireless access point which is a bit more pricey.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on how big your outside is.

 

Easiest solution if you have a small outdoor area is to mount a wireless router near a window and set it as a wireless access point.

 

If you have a bigger outdoor area and you want to cover it you'll need to set up a higher powered wireless access point which is a bit more pricey.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

My wireless router is near a window, and for the front of the house that works fairly well. It is the backyard where it falls flat. It is not a huge yard, maybe 50' by 150'. What sort of price tag are we talking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wireless router is near a window, and for the front of the house that works fairly well. It is the backyard where it falls flat. It is not a huge yard, maybe 50' by 150'. What sort of price tag are we talking?

 

We ended up adding an additional WiFi router to accommodate.  Now have coverage for both front and back of the house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We ended up adding an additional WiFi router to accommodate.  Now have coverage for both front and back of the house. 

 

I figure it will cost me no matter what way I go, another router on the backside of the house was the first option I thought of. I was hoping to learn of some other possibilities before I chose that route. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We ended up adding an additional WiFi router to accommodate. Now have coverage for both front and back of the house.

Upon further review it actually isn't all that pricey.

 

You'll need something like these..

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004EGI3CI/ref=mp_s_a_1_sc_1?qid=1429552774&sr=8-1-spell&pi=AC_SX110_SY165_QL70&keywords=Ubiquiti+nano+Staton

 

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004EHSV4W/ref=mp_s_a_1_sc_2?qid=1429552774&sr=8-2-spell&pi=AC_SX110_SY165_QL70&keywords=Ubiquiti+nano+Staton

 

Basically directional antenna units. You can achieve 2x2 mimo beam forming and the like with the ubiquiti equipment though if you need wider coverage then there are models that support a single omni antenna with the downside being less range.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figure it will cost me no matter what way I go, another router on the backside of the house was the first option I thought of. I was hoping to learn of some other possibilities before I chose that route. 

 

You seem like you would prefer a different solution.  Why?  A second router set to join your current Wi-Fi network is likely your easiest and cheapest option.  You should be able to accomplish that for $100.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2.4 GHz will be your friend here. We live on 5 acres, using about 3 of it and it got interesting to provide decent WiFi outside.

 

I'm a fan of Netgear, so I will soon be replacing what I have and going with a more powerful Netgear AC1900 Nighthawk Range Extender.

 

The way I have it setup, I can't ever run a hard wire to do it the right way. But at least now I have my router on one side of the house and my current range extender on the other side and works fairly well. 

 

I wanted to upgrade so I can equip the new AC beam-forming technology.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem like you would prefer a different solution.  Why?  A second router set to join your current Wi-Fi network is likely your easiest and cheapest option.  You should be able to accomplish that for $100.

 

AJ

 

It is not so much that I would prefer a different solution. I just wanted to see if there where other solutions out there that may have been better options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not so much that I would prefer a different solution. I just wanted to see if there where other solutions out there that may have been better options.

 

I will use my setup as an illustration.  I have my main router, a current generation 802.11ac AirPort Extreme, at the front of the house by the cable outlet and modem.  I have my second router, an older generation 802.11n AirPort Extreme, at the back of the house by a window facing the backyard.  The second router connects as a client to my main router via 5 GHz 802.11n.  Since both routers are 3x3 MIMO, the max MCS index between them supports 450 Mbps -- plenty fast.  Additionally, because the second router is on my desk in the kitchen, I can use its Ethernet ports for my NAS drives and a cheap Windows laptop that I do not want on my Wi-Fi network.  Never underestimate the fringe benefit of additional Ethernet ports in other parts of the house.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not so much that I would prefer a different solution. I just wanted to see if there where other solutions out there that may have been better options.

 

 

I will use my setup as an illustration.  I have my main router, a current generation 802.11ac AirPort Extreme, at the front of the house by the cable outlet and modem.  I have my second router, an older generation 802.11n AirPort Extreme, at the back of the house by a window facing the backyard.  The second router connects as a client to my main router via 5 GHz 802.11n.  Since both routers are 3x3 MIMO, the max MCS index between them supports 450 Mbps -- plenty fast.  Additionally, because the second router is on my desk in the kitchen, I can use its Ethernet ports for my NAS drives and a cheap Windows laptop that I do not want on my Wi-Fi network.  Never underestimate the fringe benefit of additional Ethernet ports in other parts of the house.

 

AJ

 

I understand your dilemma Craig.  I also looked at several options before installing the second router.  The final decision came down to costs.  I am not at the extreme of AJ but as you and others are probably in the same situation with multiple devices connecting and poor reception from one end of your home to the other.  It is nice to be able to have WiFi reception on your property regardless of your location.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I had read the ideal way is to run an ethernet cable from your main router to the secondary one which you will connect as an access point. AJ can you comment on wired vs wireless for the second access point? Are you sacrificing anything noticeable if you don't run a cable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I had read the ideal way is to run an ethernet cable from your main router to the secondary one which you will connect as an access point. AJ can you comment on wired vs wireless for the second access point? Are you sacrificing anything noticeable if you don't run a cable?

Increased latency and speed decrease is typical.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I had read the ideal way is to run an ethernet cable from your main router to the secondary one which you will connect as an access point. AJ can you comment on wired vs wireless for the second access point? Are you sacrificing anything noticeable if you don't run a cable?

 

The biggest thing going wireless will be speed.

 

I personally would recommend always going wired if you can, other wise you do lose a noticeable amount of speed going wireless. Sometimes you have no other option. And with the new technology being used in the newer routers/access points, it's not as big of an issue as it used to be.

 

@CDK What speeds do you pay for?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had serious latency issues when I tried a wireless extender (It wasn't a real extender, just an old router with DD-WRT which was probably the problem) so I ended up repurposing some phone wire for Ethernet to the repeater and now it works great, covering the whole house and yards.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest thing going wireless will be speed.

 

I personally would recommend always going wired if you can, other wise you do lose a noticeable amount of speed going wireless. Sometimes you have no other option. And with the new technology being used in the newer routers/access points, it's not as big of an issue as it used to be.

 

@CDK What speeds do you pay for?

 

My home internet connection is 50/50 Mbps.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon FIOS? I think they sell a "range extender" that goes with the Actiontec routers.

 

Yes, and I will say it again, I was so happy when I got rid of Comcast for them....

 

I will look into that as an option, thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does Wi-Fi help with text messaging?

If you are using wifi calling on an android device, your text messages will also be sent over the wifi link. In fact, when in wifi calling, my phone completely disables the cellular radio, probably to save battery. This is not the case on iPhones however. I'm not sure why this is, but that seems to be the consensus. The iPhone implementation of wifi calling is different somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://ir.echostar.com/news-releases/news-release-details/echostar-corporation-announces-successful-completion-various They have pushed off debt for at least 6 years, except for 139 million. It is secured by spectrum.  They want to put this money towards completing their build out.  Hopefully this includes some midrange capacity.
    • Just revisiting the RCS issue and discussing another point I find odd.  Yeah, my family and close friends and most coworkers still mostly use whats app in our chats due to the odd RCS issues.   Some have Apple phones, some Samsung.  But using Facebook Messenger or Whats App handily eliminates those issues.   But the other thing I find odd is how all the information out there states that to use the Smart View app to mirror your phone to your TV that your TV and your phone have to be on the same wifi network.  That is 100 percent untrue.  I've historically not had wifi at home and only use it in our common areas in our community or occasionally at work.  But primarily I just use my phone for everything and do not have wifi at home.  It's because I haven't needed it.  I've been using all my Samsung phones for the better part of a decade now as my entertainment center because it's simple, effective, portable and absolutely does not require a wifi connection for my TV in order to cast all the content from my phone.  I'm not sure why it is stated that it is required.  The two devices - as we all no doubt know - create a wifi direct connection between the two devices in order for smart view to work, however, no general wifi network is required at all.  Again, I've been enjoying the feature for close to a decade but I find it odd that they say that you need wifi at home to use it.  Samsung television sets, Roku TV sets, LG TV sets (I cast to all of them at work regularly, again, sans wifi) and TCL TVs are all compatible.  There are likely more but these are the ones that I regularly screen mirror to, again, without the two devices being on the same network (this is separate from the notion of creating a wifi direct connection between the 2 in order to enable the service). This is the sole reason I only buy Samsung phones.   I tried a Pixel device before the Pixel 8 (which was the first to allow display out via wired connection for streaming) but it simply did not offer the same feature.   I wonder why they say this.  It's interesting if nothing else.  
    • Yeah, I probably see it through a Washington/Oregon market lens. And maybe a little Nebraska too.  These are the only places I have monitored Tmo overlay of USC closely. Tmo has already added service on 80% of the same towers that were unique to USC just 5 years ago around here.  The 20% left are either too close to an existing Tmo site, or, probably already on Tmo's plans to collocation.  But there is one USC site on the beach where our family likes to go that I am dying for Tmo to add service.  There won't be a lot of new coverage added here. But I have not done really any review in other USC areas.  But I definitely think it's a good move. Robert
    • Found Ericsson C-band+DoD in Brooklyn. What tipped me off was when I mapped a new eNB in this area on Halloween but I didn't see any permits for a new site in the area and the sectors I mapped matched the existing site that was there. Drove by it today and sure enough it's an Ericsson C-band + DoD site, likely one of the first in the city.  This is eNB 110340, formerly eNB 115257. — — — — — Also a T-Mobile new build in Queens. The permit for this one was submitted last year as a replacement for another monopole that got demolished nearby. It must've only recently got installed because it was offline when I drove by it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...