Jump to content

FCC Revokes Net Neutrality [WAS: FCC Approves Net Neutrality]


JThorson

Recommended Posts

My feelings also. I don't need an unlimited choice of providers. But I would hope most people would have the choice of a couple wired providers, plus some fixed wireless options.

The order above does nothing to improve competition. Nothing.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The order above does nothing to improve competition. Nothing.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And nowhere in my post do I claim that it will....

 

I was trying to point out that there is a huge customer benefit just from customers who have 1 or maybe 2 options, getting 3 or 4 options. I'm not trying to score points for Title II here, just making the point that even if you don't have a highly competitive market with dozens of options, even moving from monopoly/duopoly to oligopoly or Monopolistic competition is a substantial improvement from the customer's point of view.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pay $45/mo for 3/1 and only get on average 1.5/.75. I'm not happy about it either.

LoL

Well, per the title II regulations passed, while the FCC is going to wait until later to work out how to implement them, the FCC is required by the regs just passed to impose taxes on your already expensive internet connection. To quote the dissenting FCC commissioner:

Title II “authorizes the Commission to impose universal service contributions requirements on telecommunications carriers—and, indeed, goes even further to require ‘[e]very telecommunications carrier that provides interstate telecommunications services’ to contribute.”

 

And so the FCC now has a statutory obligation to make sure that all Internet service providers (and in the end, their customers) contribute to the Universal Service Fund. That’s why the Order repeatedly states that it is only deferring a decision on new broadband taxes—not prohibiting them.

 

 

 

Of course, my objection to the new regs is the subjective catchall provision, requiring ‘just and reasonable’ conduct.” Keeping in mind this is the same agency which spent its entire history persecuting what it considered unreasonable obscenity on the airwaves, how long do we have until they decide it is  unreasonable for ISPs to not actively filter traffic for piracy and obscenity? 

Edited by LoneSnark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Cogent, Level 3 threaten to file net neutrality complaints over unfair telco, cable interconnection practices

 

http://www.fiercetelecom.com/story/cogent-level-3-threaten-file-net-neutrality-complaints-over-unfair-telco-ca/2015-04-10

 

"The Net Neutrality wars, begun they have" lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been keeping up with it, but is the FTC going to put a halt to AT&T's throttling practices on their unlimited data plans?

Possibly. FTC won a jurisdiction ruling.

Imagine how much lower att speeds will be once a couple million users get truly unlimited! He he he he

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't been keeping up with it, but is the FTC going to put a halt to AT&T's throttling practices on their unlimited data plans?

http://www.natlawreview.com/article/att-court-narrowly-interprets-ftc-common-carrier-exception-and-permits-throttling-ca

 

Case will proceed.

Att could just declare unlimited to be over - even for tho grandfathered subs. Once your 2 yr contract is up, no more restrictions on att.

 

The fact it's spending sooo much money and energy fighting this is puzzling.

Only reason I can think of is that it's scared of the backlash if it has to stop lying to its millions of grandfathered customers and say "you no longer have unlimited but you're gonna keep on having the 3 or 5gb throttled.

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it. Att is not lying to customers. ATT has never told a singal customer in marketing or in any other form that they have unlimited 4g or 3G data in the past five years. You don't have it on ATT, you do have unlimited data just not 4g, 4g lte or 3G. There is nothing deceptive about what att or Verizon has done. The FTC is grandstanding and customer who are unhappy about the fact that they are throttled have choices. No customer grandfathered or not has a right to unlimited 4g data on att or Verizon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it. Att is not lying to customers. ATT has never told a singal customer in marketing or in any other form that they have unlimited 4g or 3G data in the past five years. You don't have it on ATT, you do have unlimited data just not 4g, 4g lte or 3G. There is nothing deceptive about what att or Verizon has done. The FTC is grandstanding and customer who are unhappy about the fact that they are throttled have choices. No customer grandfathered or not has a right to unlimited 4g data on att or Verizon.

They're not trying to force att to give unlimited. The problem is att passed off the 3gb or 5gb as unlimited.

 

If att had simply said "you're off contract, no more unlimited for you. You get 5gb on lte then throttled" there wouldn't be a problem.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not trying to force att to give unlimited. The problem is att passed off the 3gb or 5gb as unlimited.

 

If att had simply said "you're off contract, no more unlimited for you. You get 5gb on lte then throttled" there wouldn't be a problem.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No att has not. 3 or 5 gigs of 4g data and then unlimited access to 2g data is in fact unlimited data. The amount of data a user can used is not limited by definition it is unlimited. If att or Verizon told people they have unlimited 3 or 4g data the FTC would have a point. They don't.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Die, "unlimited" wireless data, die.  You were not made for this world.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Die, "unlimited" wireless data, die. You were not made for this world.

 

AJ

I always figured find the smartest guy in the room, flip an idea they just hated then flip it upside down to make it work well, and wait for that to happen to me if I couldn't do it to myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

These examples shouldn’t surprise anyone. After all, the President’s own Small Business Administration warned the FCC last year that its proposed rules would unduly burden small businesses. And yet the FCC decided to treat each and every small, scrappy broadband provider as if it were an anticompetitive industrial giant.The FCC still has a chance to heed these calls and stay the effect of President Obama’s plan to regulate the Internet. But I doubt this will happen. That’s because moving forward with this plan isn’t about logic, the law, or marketplace facts. It’s about fulfilling a political imperative.

 

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0507/DOC-333383A1.pdf

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

And to the Supreme court it goes...

 

You betcha.  VZ, AT&T, Comcast, et al., and their lobbyists and the politicians in their pockets are not going to take this lying down.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Three separate courts have upheld the ruling. I'd put money on the Supreme Court favoring the FCC. Especially so with scalia out

 

A Supreme Court 4-4 split decision along partisan lines would uphold the lower appellate court's ruling.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to take note too is with the recent acquisitions, part of the agreements have been expansion.

 

AT&T has to expand FTTP/FTTH to 12 million residents (they strung fiber down my street a couple weeks ago so now I have four ISP options! lol).  And Charter has to expand coverage to 1 million new customers.  Charter has stated they will avoid entering areas with cable providers and enter areas served by only DSL.  Plus they can't do caps for 7 years. 

 

So with NN being upheld, and the expansion of these companies we are winning some of these battles.  Granted, ATT and Charter did just get larger.  At least with Charter, there was no coverage overlapping and with ATT they have a sizable agreement to uphold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
  • 1 month later...

They should really consider renaming "Net Neutrality" to something more marketable "internet freedom act" or something to that effect. 

The word "freedom" is used so loosely in politics (almost to the point of an inverse meaning) this one would actually be fitting and have weight behind it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should really consider renaming "Net Neutrality" to something more marketable "internet freedom act" or something to that effect.

 

The word "freedom" is used so loosely in politics (almost to the point of an inverse meaning) this one would actually be fitting and have weight behind it.

Maybe add a bald eagle emblem holding Ethernet and coax cables in it's talons to drive it home.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe add a bald eagle emblem holding Ethernet and coax cables in it's talons to drive it home.

 

Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk

Seriously! LOL, I love my liberals and what they stand for, but they have a lot to learn about the whole "marketing legislation" thing from the GOP.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...