Jump to content

Sprints 'Happy Connecting' Event


JThorson

Recommended Posts

Too serious? We were hoping for something better, not a fitness tie up.

 

Glass half empty, Josh?  Look at it this way.  It could have been far worse.  As some worried, Sprint could have declared Network Vision ready for the world and said, "Happy Connecting."  So, this trivial announcement is, well, trivial.  No big deal.

 

Now, go fill your half empty glass.  Have a drink.  You will feel better.  The Hotel California has pink champagne on ice.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still wondering if I was witnessing another event of some sort. I'm certainly am not happy.

 

TS

Too serious? We were hoping for something better, not a fitness tie up.

Maybe I set my expectations lower than others, but I'm honestly not sure what people were expecting. Someone guessed an announcement of HD voice in the 5th post in this thread. That made the most sense all along. The only other thing they could've really announced was they've made significant process on NV, but their is still work to do. And they did that as well in the press release.

After a complete rip-and-replace overhaul of its 3G network and the deployment of 4G LTE in 471 markets, Sprint has transformed its network to deliver faster data speeds and improved call quality, with a marked decrease in dropped and blocked calls. New market launches, coverage expansions, and technical network advancements will continue in the coming months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I set my expectations lower than others, but I'm honestly not sure what people were expecting. Someone guessed an announcement of HD voice in the 5th post in this thread. That made the most sense all along. The only other thing they could've really announced was they've made significant process on NV, but their is still work to do. And they did that as well in the press release.

 

Quote

After a complete rip-and-replace overhaul of its 3G network and the deployment of 4G LTE in 471 markets, Sprint has transformed its network to deliver faster data speeds and improved call quality, with a marked decrease in dropped and blocked calls. New market launches, coverage expansions, and technical network advancements will continue in the coming months.

 

 

They are almost insinuating in that quote though that NV Is complete, but then said more launches, etc will be coming...almost confusing...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the big question is....what all were we HOPING to hear from this announcement? Were you expecting something a bit....shall we say...Magenta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it that Legere and Tmobile shit all over Net Neutrality with there white listing apps, make it seem like a monumental event that everyone loves, and somehow Sprint's event, announcing a couple of positive things here and there seem unbelievably lame. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I set my expectations lower than others, but I'm honestly not sure what people were expecting. Someone guessed an announcement of HD voice in the 5th post in this thread. That made the most sense all along. The only other thing they could've really announced was they've made significant process on NV, but their is still work to do. And they did that as well in the press release.

 

I agree.  We are so far ahead in the news here at S4GRU that we are never really excited or surprised with info by the time Sprint officially announces it.  The only things we get surprised about is trivial stuff, like Under Armor.

 

Robert

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the big question is....what all were we HOPING to hear from this announcement? Were you expecting something a bit....shall we say...Magenta

That's probably what it is.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

 

Oh, go back to staring at yourself in the mirrors on the ceiling.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

International WiFi calling I wonder how that will work! Removing the CDMA network requirement? Yes please!

 

Despite some blog sites' early reports, access to the CDMA network was never a requirement. Just a GPS signal during initial setup to verify that a user is within a Sprint licensed area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it that Legere and Tmobile shit all over Net Neutrality with there white listing apps, make it seem like a monumental event that everyone loves, and somehow Sprint's event, announcing a couple of positive things here and there seem unbelievably lame. 

 

Hesse should've worn some skinny jeans, Chuck Taylors and a yellow T-shirt with a big S in the middle of it and maybe flown onto the stage like he was Superman. Then, topped it all off by dropping a few F-bombs and regardless of what was announced, the techno-razzi would've been in a lather.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.  We are so far ahead in the news here at S4GRU that we are never really excited or surprised with info by the time Sprint officially announces it.  The only things we get surprised about is trivial stuff, like Under Armor.

 

Robert

 

I'd be more impressed if they got someone like Flavor Flav to commentate the event....hahahaha

 

flavor-flav-jail-e1338145945850.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing this, I think this event was to say "hey, we are still here and we are working hard to make our network better and offer great service." I think most people would take that as boring and how they don't have anything. I mean, Sprint announced 28 more 4G markets today, that is also good news.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks, it seems the biggest sprint panty droppers come with no warning at all from Sprint...

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

And it hits you when you least expect it...like an unexpected bad fishy smell....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be more impressed if they got someone like Flavor Flav to commentate the event....hahahaha

 

No, Lil Jon.  What?!  Yeah!  Okay!

 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Permits for 8T8R deployments have been popping up in places outside of that as well.

Speaking of 8T8R, since the frequency is higher, the signal won't travel as far correct? If that is the case, how would they cover the same footprint compared to 1900Mhz? Wouldn't they need more towers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of 8T8R, since the frequency is higher, the signal won't travel as far correct? If that is the case, how would they cover the same footprint compared to 1900Mhz? Wouldn't they need more towers?

Depends entirely on site density and topography and etc. 2500 mhz is worse than 1900 mhz but modern technology such as the radio heads sprint is using can help out a lot.

 

It won't be equal to pcs or aws but it'll be significantly better than the clear implementation and come close to pcs in markets with high cell site density as in less than 1-2 miles between each cell site.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends entirely on site density and topography and etc. 2500 mhz is worse than 1900 mhz but modern technology such as the radio heads sprint is using can help out a lot.

 

It won't be equal to pcs or aws but it'll be significantly better than the clear implementation and come close to pcs in markets with high cell site density as in less than 1-2 miles between each cell site.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Doesn't Beam-forming also have help in pushing the propagation characteristics to be pretty close to 1900Mhz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends entirely on site density and topography and etc. 2500 mhz is worse than 1900 mhz but modern technology such as the radio heads sprint is using can help out a lot.

 

It won't be equal to pcs or aws but it'll be significantly better than the clear implementation and come close to pcs in markets with high cell site density as in less than 1-2 miles between each cell site.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Okay thanks. I was just curious because where I live there are a lot of trees and mountains that could effect the signal. I guess I will see when it happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't Beam-forming also have help in pushing the propagation characteristics to be pretty close to 1900Mhz?

No.

 

Advanced Beam forming mainly helps in edge of cell performance.

 

Broadcasted frequencies travel forever but the usable signals degrade rapidly.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of 8T8R, since the frequency is higher, the signal won't travel as far correct?

 

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

Advanced Beam forming mainly helps in edge of cell performance.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Gotcha...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't trivialize the Under Armour announcement. It's a dissappointment for many of us techno geeks but Under Armour sells...there is a whole generation, like my son, dressed from head to toe in Under Armour waiting for their first cell phone who will beg for a phone with UA no matter what the features are.

I agree. We are so far ahead in the news here at S4GRU that we are never really excited or surprised with info by the time Sprint officially announces it. The only things we get surprised about is trivial stuff, like Under Armor.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Kind of amazing that T-Mobile is still holding onto that speed title despite Verizon all but killing off lowband 5G on their network. While Verizon is mostly being evaluated on mmWave and C-band performance, T-Mobile and AT&T's average 5G speeds include their massive lowband 5G networks that are significantly slower.
    • 5G in the U.S. – Additional Mid-band Spectrum Driving Performance Gains T-Mobile holds on to it's lead in 5G Speed
    • Yup. Very true. We were originally on an Everything Data 1500 Plan, which got Unlimited Minutes thanks to Marcelo's "Loyalty Benefits" offer. We then switched to Unlimited Freedom (with the Free HD add-on that Sprint originally wanted $20/month per line for.... remember that?) because the pricing was better with "iPhone for Life", vs. the "Loyalty Credit" for staying on a Legacy Plan. After that, I ran the numbers and switched us over to Sprint MAX, especially for the international travel benefits. There's absolutely no reason for us to switch to Go5G Plus or Go5G Next if we're going to do BYOD by purchasing from Apple/Samsung/Google directly as we've been doing. These new plans aren't priced for current customers to switch to. They're priced for new customers, where they throw in a free line, etc. It's gone from "Uncarrier" to "Carrier". What a shame.
    • Strange business model that they keep around all these pricing plans. 1000s of plans per carrier is reportedly not uncommon.  Training customer support must be a nightmare. Even MVNOs have legacy plans. A downside of their contract mentality I guess. Best to change contracts during a recession. But then all carriers try to squeeze out legacy plan benefits as they grow old.  
    • Everything "Uncarrier" is becoming "Carrier" again. Because of the Credit Limit that T-Mobile put on our account for no reason at all (and wouldn't change/update the last time I checked all the way up to the CEO), I don't plan on buying/upgrading our iPhones through T-Mobile. I'm going through Apple directly. Looks like I'll be going through Google and Samsung directly for our other lines for upgrades. Also, we're staying on Sprint Max given the ridiculous pricing for Go5G Plus. On Sprint Max, we currently pay for our Plan: $260 for 7 Voice Lines $25 for two Wearable Lines. (One is $10/Month. The other is $15/Month because the AutoPay discount only applies up to 8 lines.) Total: $285/Month vs. Go5G Plus (Per the Broadband Facts "nutrition label" on the T-Mobile Website): https://www.t-mobile.com/commerce/cell-phone-plans $360 - ($5 AutoPay Discount x 7 Voice Lines) = $325 The Watch Plans show as either $12/Month or $15/Month: https://www.t-mobile.com/cell-phone-plans/affordable-data-plans/smartwatches So this is about the same for the wearables as what we're paying now. Overall, it's quite more than we're paying now to switch plans. Ridiculous....
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...