Jump to content

Sprint reshuffles networks team: Saw promoted, Elfman and Azzi to leave company


milan03

Recommended Posts

People can knock the Ceo of T-Mobile all they want. He's getting results. 

 

 

Results? Perhaps, but for all his bluster his "uncarrier" initiatives have yet to show a net profit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, why such hostility for trying to differentiate yourself from the past. T-Mobile made one of the two headed dinosaurs create a generous family plan. Not sprint, would I have loved if sprint came up with it? Yes, of course. Give credit were credit is due. Man, I hate when people just wanna toot their own horn.

 

Listen, I come from the Nextel days. You had Nextel you were proud to have them. It's not the case with sprint no where by far.

 

Our Ceo needs to make its subs feel proud to be with them and at this moment I can't recommend sprint to anyone. I look forward to a day when I can but it's not here yet.

 

 

Results? Perhaps, but for all his bluster his "uncarrier" initiatives have yet to show a net profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen, I come from the Nextel days. You had Nextel you were proud to have them. It's not the case with sprint no where by far.

 

Our Ceo needs to make its subs feel proud to be with them and at this moment I can't recommend sprint to anyone. I look forward to a day when I can but it's not here yet.

 

You need to get off that bandwagon.  Your choice of wireless provider in no way defines you.  That you should be "proud" is ridiculous.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm here. The moves, while unfortunate to see anyone to lose their jobs, were needed. I like Robert's take. I think Sprint executives and employees there have taken no as an answer for far too long. That has to change. Things like tracking real-time data shows me though that SoftBank is up to the task. Sprint just has to put their foot on the pedal and innovate. That's the fastest way out of their current conundrum.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, your right. I wouldn't buy a bugatti cause I'm a rich prick who likes to show off and look down at everyone else. I'd buy it cause I like the paint job.

 

Cmon AJ, We buy/use alot of stuff cause how it makes us feel. If that wasn't ever the case they'd be no fads. Do I agree with it? NO, But that's what makes the public what it is.

 

At this point in time if I needed to make/take an important call. I'd feel more secure taking it with my vzw device then my sprint device at this time. Which I don't like admitting but it's the truth.

 

 

You need to get off that bandwagon. Your choice of wireless provider in no way defines you. That you should be "proud" is ridiculous.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, why such hostility for trying to differentiate yourself from the past. T-Mobile made one of the two headed dinosaurs create a generous family plan. Not sprint, would I have loved if sprint came up with it? Yes, of course. Give credit were credit is due. Man, I hate when people just wanna toot their own horn.

 

Listen, I come from the Nextel days. You had Nextel you were proud to have them. It's not the case with sprint no where by far.

 

Our Ceo needs to make its subs feel proud to be with them and at this moment I can't recommend sprint to anyone. I look forward to a day when I can but it's not here yet.

 

 

Hostility? No, just pointing out a fact. Man, I hate when people make unfounded assumptions.

 

While illustrating what t-mobile may have "made" At&t do, you neglect to mention that t-mobile is tweaking their plans on March 23. Those tweaks raise their data limits and align pretty closely to what Sprint is doing. I.e. 1 GB included, 3 GB for $10. Give credit where credit is due, right?

 

I had nextel at one point in time too. They provided a service in exchange for payment. I never felt "proud" of that arrangement. I don't know why I would feel "proud" for paying a certain company my money every month. I concede that maybe that's just me though. I buy what works for me. As long as that arrangement is mutually beneficial I'm "satisfied", but "proud"? Doesn't even enter into the equation.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Hesse probably is good for Sprint but... It shouldn't have taken softbank to fire bad leaders. Also, as a leader, you are fully accountable for the work produced by your employees. The two people who got fired, just lost site of what they were supposed to be doing and how to go about it. The new commercials in the past couple of weeks are infinitely better than the previous ones.

Keep in mind that Hesse formerly reported to a board of directors that was known to thwart at least some of his attempts to add to, streamline, and modernize Sprint. He now reports directly to Son. My suspicion is that he and Son are making moves that Hesse has long known were necessary, but which he did not have the authority to make. I further suspect that he and Son have spent much of the last 7 months perfecting a syrategic plan, and that many more chsnges are coming. Does this mean the Hesse himself will survive? Maybe. Maybe not. Time - and results - will tell. But realistically, Son is responsible to no board, and has the power to do what he needs to do.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that Hesse formerly reported to a board of directors that was known to thwart at least some of his attempts to add to, streamline, and modernize Sprint. He now reports directly to Son. My suspicion is that he and Son are making moves that Hesse has long known were necessary, but which he did not have the authority to make.

 

Good point. Perhaps the most recent and glaring example of this is when Hesse's attempt to buy MetroPCS was shot down, in the eleventh hour no less, by the board in early 2012. How would the wireless landscape look today had Hesse been allowed to fully execute his plans?

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. Perhaps the most recent and glaring example of this is when Hesse's attempt to buy MetroPCS was shot down, in the eleventh hour no less, by the board in early 2012. How would the wireless landscape look today had Hesse been allowed to fully execute his plans?

 

In hindsight, not purchasing MetroPCS was a blunder.  Their competitor, T-Mobile, has been strengthened as a result.  And Sprint would have benefited from the PCS holdings of Metro and could have swapped their AWS for more PCS.  Hesse was right on that move and he was denied.  And Legere is happy for it.

 

Robert

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In hindsight, not purchasing MetroPCS was a blunder. Their competitor, T-Mobile, has been strengthened as a result. And Sprint would have benefited from the PCS holdings of Metro and could have swapped their AWS for more PCS. Hesse was right on that move and he was denied. And Legere is happy for it.

 

Robert

Proof positive that shareholders aren't always correct. Most often than not, they aren't. Sometimes they just need to get the hell out of the way and let upper management do their jobs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proof positive that shareholders aren't always correct. Most often than not, they aren't. Sometimes they just need to get the hell out of the way and let upper management do their jobs.

And sometimes it's just the bored of directors (yes, I misspelled that on purpose) being idiots and needing to be replaced or controlled by a higher authority, in this case Son.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm here. The moves, while unfortunate to see anyone to lose their jobs, were needed. I like Robert's take. I think Sprint executives and employees there have taken no as an answer for far too long. That has to change. Things like tracking real-time data shows me though that SoftBank is up to the task. Sprint just has to put their foot on the pedal and innovate. That's the fastest way out of their current conundrum.

 

I see the same malaise at Sprint that I see at a lot of other companies in the US. Management by CYA, pass the buck, don't rock the boat, don't stick your neck out, be a good team member. Sometimes you need to chew some people out in front of other people to get their attention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S23 and S24 (at least ultra versions) have 4xCA NR. I currently have n41+n41+n25+n71 most places I go.  I think select devices have 2xCA upload but I do not think it is in widespread use yet. CA is still mostly download focused.
    • If they use n41 + n41 2CA, people that are somewhat distant from the cell site will have an OK download but the upload will be a disaster.  Upload capability on b-41 was always a disaster on the old Sprint Network.   Now, with n25 + n41 combination, even the more distant users have a more decent upload.  I see n41 + n41 + n25 now with my S22 and I understand that we will see 4xCA with newer phones in the future.     I also see n41 + n41 + n71 sometimes too. Also some other combinations of 25, 41, 71.  I would think that eventually we will see AWS paired with n41 too.  What I am not sure of is ----  when I see 3xCA on my S22, I can see the 3 channels involved in the download but I am never sure just what I have on the upload. I do not think I have 3xCA on the upload.
    • I don't know enough about the nuts and bolts of NR to know the answer, but is there a reason they're not doing two overlapping 100 MHz n41 carriers and using selective resource shutoff to make each one 97 MHz?  Thus making use of the full 194 MHz instead of leaving 4 MHz unused as implied by the current standard 100+90 configuration? - Trip
    • Looks like another T-Mobile 5G bump happened over the past week and a half, maybe less: n41 carriers are now 90+100 MHz, up from 80+100 (which in turn is up from 40+100 back in early March). This is on top of the new n25 carrier recently. As part of this, it looks like T-Mobile is starting to prefer n25+n41 2CA even when pushing data, rather than having higher levels of CA that would hit higher peak speeds; at least indoors I need to force n41-only if I want to see the full 190 MHz there. To be fair the speeds are plenty quick with that amount of spectrum, and I'm sure they're load balancing, and my guess is this is a little better for battery life? With this expansion, they're now at 10x10+10x10 n25, 15x15 n71, 100+90 n41, for a total of 260 MHz (including FD uplink) of deployed NR here, up from 250 MHz a week ago, 230 MHz two weeks ago, and 190 MHz six months ago. VZW is at 140 MHz minus mmW, 170 if you count n2 DSS. AT&T is at 150 MHz (80+40 n77, 15x15 n5), 210 MHz I think if you count n2 and n66 DSS (guessing they're still running those). With this level of spectrum they should be able to continue offering home internet wherever. Guessing this is the last upgrade they can make before they need to throw new equipment on sites for C-Band. At this rate I figure that'll happen next year on a few dozen high-traffic sites.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/wireless/tds-telecom-to-launch-mobile-service-via-nctc-s-mvno Surprising given merger.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...