Jump to content

Dish is that guy you don't like at the acution. Dish -->T-Mobile


Calvin200

Recommended Posts

I don't like the direction that he is taking pushing the "Video" aspect of wireless more than the mobile aspect. Keep the phone company a phone company....He just want's the spectrum......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the direction that he is taking pushing the "Video" aspect of wireless more than the mobile aspect. Keep the phone company a phone company....He just want's the spectrum......

He may actually want the infrastructure more, so he can get his spectrum deployed faster.

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh... I can't see DT selling to Dish, I doubt Charlie will give them a high enough offer.

 

Also, if you value TMo as a disruptor, I can't see Charlie Ergen keeping TMobile's current pricing structure in place. I can only see him raising prices.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let him have it. I think Son should bid T-Mobile up then withdraw and leave Charlie holding the bag.

 

SprinT-Mobile is unlikely to happen as I don't think the FCC will go for that. That said I tend to think Fraydog is right, Charlie is probably not willing to cough up enough cash for T-Moblie (though I think the FCC would go for it).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dish and sprint are working together.....

Charlie wants in ... If charlie knows sprint wants tmo AND goes and gets it... That "trial" thing with dish/sprint will be cut or raised really high in price for charlie.....

Sprint CAN EASILY (maybe a little exaggerated) get by fcc. Sprint can get the merger ... Say charlie will be the 4th carrier, and whatever spectrum sprint doesnt want/need will be what charlie gets...   Charlie can then start his wireless company

 

The fcc wanted 4 carriers,was yes of course it better for comp.

2 small carriers will never be able to keep up with 2 BIG carriers... Time will eventually run out on the 2 small ones, which is what we have been witnessing the last 5 years with tmo/sprint. We all know if tmo/att went through it would have been wriiten in stone that vzw/sprint was next. The while the fcc might not want tmo/sprint... its obvious they cant compete with the big 2... While they are trying, the honestly cant put a dent into the other 2.

 

Charlie wants in bad, let sprint and whoever merge, and then let charlie in =4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consumers care most about price and coverage/dependability.

 

If sprint and tmo want to compete with att/vz, they will have to offer better service at LOWER prices to get people to take the trouble to SWITCH.

 

People who already hate att/vz, may have more motivation to switch without a big price difference.

 

But for everyone else who tolerates or even prefers att/vz, to get them to switch sprint/tmo will have to provide some other carrot besides unlimited data at the same or similar price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The combined companies would preserve four national wireless players, add tons of spectrum to T-Mobile's arsenal and the combined company would have more clout to participate and bid at any upcoming 600 MHz auction.

 

The value of Dish' spectrum has more than doubled since 2008 and will likely grow with the addition of the H block. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The combined companies would preserve four national wireless players, add tons of spectrum to T-Mobile's arsenal and the combined company would have more clout to participate and bid at any upcoming 600 MHz auction.

 

The value of Dish' spectrum has more than doubled since 2008 and will likely grow with the addition of the H block.

You mean Sprint's arsenal, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think about this, I cant see any buyout of tmo that does not include Dish. There will be considerable overlapping sites between tmo and sprint. Rather than decommissioning lease agreements, etc... why not structure a buyout that automatically spins overlapping sites to dish? Partner that with a site sharing agreement for sites where sprint was not represented, perhaps offering charlie usage and reasonable spectrum sharing. Charlie would avoid revenue sharing or cost exchange in the places where sprint and tmo had identical coverage. Spectrum would be a mess to sort out who gets what, but FCC approval becomes more likely

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think about this, I cant see any buyout of tmo that does not include Dish. There will be considerable overlapping sites between tmo and sprint. Rather than decommissioning lease agreements, etc... why not structure a buyout that automatically spins overlapping sites to dish? Partner that with a site sharing agreement for sites where sprint was not represented, perhaps offering charlie usage and reasonable spectrum sharing. Charlie would avoid revenue sharing or cost exchange in the places where sprint and tmo had identical coverage. Spectrum would be a mess to sort out who gets what, but FCC approval becomes more likely Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

 

They could sell T-Mobile's network to Dish sans spectrum and customers, of course. It will take a bit of time to transition the spectrum from T-Mobile's network to Sprint's. Meanwhile Dish could be deploying their spectrum and EBS on T-Mobile's network. The FCC has their 4th network, the tower companies don't lose a customer, DT is out of the US market, Softbank has their competitive carrier. I see it as a win-win-win-win scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The combined companies would preserve four national wireless players, add tons of spectrum to T-Mobile's arsenal and the combined company would have more clout to participate and bid at any upcoming 600 MHz auction.

 

The value of Dish' spectrum has more than doubled since 2008 and will likely grow with the addition of the H block. 

 

In order to buy T-Mobile they will have to come up with $20+B for DT shares and then have to take over about $15B of debt. Does Dish have enough clout to borrow that kind moolah? T-Mobile just raised some debt to purchase 700MHz spectrum from Verizon and others as well as raise $1.8B in a stock sale.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order to buy T-Mobile they will have to come up with $20+B for DT shares and then have to take over about $15B of debt. Does Dish have enough clout to borrow that kind moolah? T-Mobile just raised some debt to purchase 700MHz spectrum from Verizon and others as well as raise $1.8B in a stock sale.

 

These transactions require the suitor to finance such a deal.  They will approach banks to garner the capital needed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • A heavy n41 overlay as an acquisition condition would be a win for customers, and eventually a win for T-Mobile as that might be enough to preclude VZW/AT&T adding C-Band for FWA due to spreading the market too thinly (which means T-Mobile would just have local WISPs/wireline ISPs as competition). USCC spacing (which is likely for contiguous 700 MHz LTE coverage in rural areas) isn't going to be enough for contiguous n41 anyway, and I doubt they'll densify enough to get there.
    • Boost Infinite with a rainbow SIM (you can get it SIM-only) is the cheapest way, at $25/mo, to my knowledge; the cheaper Boost Mobile plans don't run on Dish native. Check Phonescoop for n70 support on a given phone; the Moto G 5G from last year may be the cheapest unlocked phone with n70 though data speeds aren't as good as something with an X70 or better modem.
    • Continuing the USCC discussion, if T-Mobile does a full equipment swap at all of USCC's sites, which they probably will for vendor consistency, and if they include 2.5 on all of those sites, which they probably will as they definitely have economies of scale on the base stations, that'll represent a massive capacity increase in those areas over what USCC had, and maybe a coverage increase since n71 will get deployed everywhere and B71 will get deployed any time T-Mobile has at least 25x25, and maybe where they have 20x20. Assuming this deal goes through (I'm betting it does), I figure I'll see contiguous coverage in the area of southern IL where I was attempting to roam on USCC the last time I was there, though it might be late next year before that switchover happens.
    • Forgot to post this, but a few weeks ago I got to visit these small cells myself! They're spread around Grant park and the surrounding areas, but unfortunately none of the mmwave cells made it outside of the parks along the lake into the rest of downtown. I did spot some n41 small cells around downtown, but they seemed to be older deployments limited to 100mhz and performed poorly.    
    • What is the cheapest way to try Dish's wireless network?  Over the past year I've seen them add their equipment to just about every cell site here, I'm assuming just go through Boost's website?  What phones are Dish native?  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...