Jump to content

Current & Coming Soon Sprint Communities - LTE Status


Dkoellerwx

Recommended Posts

That is some good news I hope it's sooner then later lol !!! Thanks

 

I just posted a pic in the Las Vegas Market thread this afternoon of a tower that has new antennas on it. They are circled in red. Check it out.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

joplin must have been a mistake from sprint its almost been 4 months now

 

Sprint never specified what the "coming months" meant. And this is the reason. Part of north Texas was announced in July, yet still hasn't launched. Work of some sort is underway in the Missouri market, including Joplin, so I don't believe it is too far off now.

 

oh and according to sensorly Pittsburg KS and Nevada MO both have 4G already

 

Yes, they do, I mapped a good chunk of the area around Nevada. However they are in the Kansas market, not related to Joplin. Also, Sprint has not made any announcement about these cities, so they will not be on the map. I believe they are part of the Joplin "metro" area and will show up on coverage maps when Joplin is announced. However, I am not certain of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice of them to box around Ohio :) lol. I saw cleveland was on the stage 3 list, any chance of NV coming here this year?

 

Yes. Work will be starting this Spring in the Cleveland market.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice of them to box around Ohio :) lol. I saw cleveland was on the stage 3 list, any chance of NV coming here this year?

 

I think they saw this and decided to see the sights first, (one can't fully appreciate Cleveland after just a day, a week, or even a year long tour), so they might be a while...

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still waiting for San Diego

 

Over one hundred sites being worked on in San Diego. I think the first LTE testing signal will be within 45-60 days.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they saw this and decided to see the sights first, (one can't fully appreciate Cleveland after just a day, a week, or even a year long tour), so they might be a while...

 

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

Apparently there isn't much to be seen at all.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN0WqSeCKW8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over one hundred sites being worked on in San Diego. I think the first LTE testing signal will be within 45-60 days.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

I think 30 days max is plenty of time. I don't think they will want to stretch it into March. Sprint's customers are very angry in San Diego and I'm sure they realize that by now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gettysburg, PA was also officially announced.

 

I think you mean to say that Gettysburg was also officially "addressed."

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Four score and 7 minutes ago :tu: (I know it was def longer than that but I tried).

 

General Lee was nobody's fool! I remember he said to the troops, "Boys, ask not what your country can do for you, 'cause the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. I have a dream!" So, when Lincoln heard that, he was, like, "I better hightail it to Charleston, 'cause it's time for one of my Gettysburg addresses."

 

I wish that I could find a video clip because, folks, you have not lived until you have seen this Saturday Night Live sketch. "Civil War Memories: Ordinary Americans who never completed high school look back at the war between the states."

 

The sketch video is great, as it is done in the archival documentary and talking heads style of Ken Burns. Alas, I can find only the transcript:

 

http://snltranscript...gcivilwar.phtml

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my way to work today I noticed an americom truck and a lift at the base of a tower. Could this be the start of sprints LTE rollout here in utah? Ive heard rumors but have not been able to confirm it anywhere? What should I look for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my way to work today I noticed an americom truck and a lift at the base of a tower. Could this be the start of sprints LTE rollout here in utah? Ive heard rumors but have not been able to confirm it anywhere? What should I look for?

 

There was an Americom truck here at a Sprint GMO site here in New Mexico. Take some pictures of the base station equipment and we will see if we can help identify. I know work is underway at GMO sites in Colorado. They may be in Utah too. What is the location of the site?

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in this initial wave. Just Terre Haute and Quincy. But I think this will change rapidly.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

Now when you mean rapidly, do you mean by like possibly the summer of this year (2013). I have not seen and word on the central Illinois area myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...