Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Long Island Market


RoccoM

Recommended Posts

Last night my home tower completely shut down for a few hours. As a result my GS9 was bouncing between 2 or 3 different near my house but only a 1x or 1x800 signal. I think at one point it went to Verizon 1x. since these 1x signal were so weak I wondered what my Essential Phone was connecting to since the RF performance its terrible. To my surprise it was connected to Clearwire B2, which means it was T-Mobile. I was really surprised that T-Mobile roaming was live for these types of situation and for the LI market. I would have though it was a tower by tower basis like T-mobiles roaming with At&t.The essential phone also connected to Clearwire B4. Speeds were around 30 to 50 Mbps so its seem like roaming is not throttled at all. Keep in mind this was am so that's why speeds were that fast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
Upgrades are going well on LI. Noticed more Small Cells and B41 upgrades. Also got this in Freeport NY 62e2cd6061df505074febbae60ed660f.jpg

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk



Hey that’s 5G!!! At least that’s what AT&T would say [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny enough these are faster than what I've seen from Att's "5G"
So not LI related but I've been testing ATT in Queens and Manhattan. I've been using an essential phone. Either is isn't a lot of B30 or it just has bad range. B41 is way more common on Sprint. Also speeds in general are a fraction of what Sprint reaches in the same areas. Although the Essential Phone doesn't have 4x4 MIMO and only has 3XCA. Pretty sure AT&T uses 4 or 5 xCA now. Also not sure about 256QAM on the Essential

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mirskyc said:

So not LI related but I've been testing ATT in Queens and Manhattan. I've been using an essential phone. Either is isn't a lot of B30 or it just has bad range. 

I've found that here in Seattle, AT&T's L2300 has less range than Sprint's L2500 without HPUE. With HPUE it's not even a competition. I think it's because their deployment is 4x4 and the equipment they're using isn't as good as what Sprint is using. Additionally, since L2300 is a relatively fragile airlink (due to the high frequency) and only deployed at 10x10 (or sometimes even 5x5), hanoff parameters are set so devices drop connection at relatively high signal levels. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Broke my all time high speed test today in Oceanside NY2862c2d129df1e642fde0e11b9ed0dee.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
 

 

edit: just realized it wasn't my record when i scrolled up. It just happened to be my record on my Galaxy S10 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Reviving this thread!

Sprint eNB 57506 is now T-Mobile eNB 478361. This was formerly the main Sprint site covering Roosevelt Field Mall. With the addition of this site, T-Mobile now has ~3 macros covering the mall in addition to a DAS. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Went out to Huntington for brunch. Great speeds on both LTE and 5G on T-Mobile and Verizon. 2CA on T-Mobile LTE and 3CA on Verizon LTE. 

T-Mobile

G8qjjzA.pngrZWolfO.png

— — — — —

Verizon

cucYvfe.jpgC4EaR73.jpg

— — — — —

Also forgot to mention that when I was passing through Woodbury, NY I saw a ton of little omnidirectional antennas on a bunch of the utility poles along Woodbury Road. I couldn't pull over to determine who they belonged to but from the looks of Cellmapper, both carriers use them throughout the town. For example, I believe this one belongs to T-Mobile.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/3/2022 at 4:48 PM, Paynefanbro said:

Went out to Huntington for brunch. Great speeds on both LTE and 5G on T-Mobile and Verizon. 2CA on T-Mobile LTE and 3CA on Verizon LTE

— —

Also forgot to mention that when I was passing through Woodbury, NY I saw a ton of little omnidirectional antennas on a bunch of the utility poles along Woodbury Road. I couldn't pull over to determine who they belonged to but from the looks of Cellmapper, both carriers use them throughout the town. For example, I believe this one belongs to T-Mobile.

Crown Castle has been blanketing the North Shore of Long Island for a few years now with those types of small cells. At the moment no T-Mobile 5G on any of them from what I can see although the R15 indicator does broadcast from them so it seems like to normal users the area is fully 5g covered.

Link below shows some of the most recent additions but there are way more than shown on that map. I remember checking that link a year or so ago and it was full of totally different locations.

https://www.crowncastle.com/communities/long-island-ny#:~:text=Long Island%2C NY&text=In Long Island%2C we built,vehicles and citywide data sharing.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Here's a funny one. We all know how T-Mobile has those weird macro sites on wooden utility poles at PSEG substations throughout Long Island. eNB 45861 is one of those sites and eNB 219507/219508 is a Sprint conversion on a radio tower 500ft away. I always wondered what T-Mobile would do to upgrade them. In this case T-Mobile just skipped upgrading it completely. The new site is taller and actually has all bands available so it's 100% worth it.

dQ6DlVx.png

According to Cellmapper no one has connected to eNB 45861 since July 2022. T-Mobile likely took it offline since it's a redundant site but as of Oct 2022 the antennas were still up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Went back out to Roosevelt Field Mall and the experience was spectacular as usual. I'm running iOS 16.4 with the Standalone 5G toggle on. I wasn't able to connect to SA n41 but I did connect to SA n71. Now that we're at 3 fully upgraded macros covering the mall, performance on SA n71 is pretty good. Long gone are the early days of standalone 5G where if you got stuck on it you could barely get over 10Mbps. With only 10MHz I was seeing ~45Mbps. NSA n41 was also great at ~350Mbps inside and out.

One thing I noticed is that my T-Mobile iPhone absolutely refused to connect to the carrier neutral DAS inside the mall unless I switched to LTE-only mode. In past years my phone would connect to the DAS and drop 5G completely but it seems like my phone preferred 5G this time around. On the other hand, the Verizon iPhone 14 that I had on me stayed on the LTE DAS the entire time.  What this meant was that on T-Mobile I'd experience "inconsistencies" in performance as my phone switched between super fast n41 and the slower but still usable n71 while the Verizon phone stayed at a consistent ~200Mbps via the DAS. The second I switched my T-Mobile iPhone to LTE, I saw those same ~200Mbps LTE speeds. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drove out to the Hamptons today and mapped at least 3 new T-Mobile sites that haven't been seen before. I don't know exactly where the sites are but it doesn't look like any of them are Sprint conversions which means T-Mobile is doing new builds in Suffolk County to densify their network.

eNB ID 331116
eNB ID 343773
eNB ID 331114

Also at least 1 new AT&T site, eNB ID 116457 

— — —

Also in the latest iOS 16.4 beta it seems like my phone more reliably sticks to standalone 5G. For most of the drive from Brooklyn to Sag Harbor I stayed on n41 with a handful of drops to n71 and I only dropped to LTE twice, both times due to being at cell edge and only having 1 bar. T-Mobile is getting insane range out of n41 too, likely due to aggregating n71 with n41 more reliably in the latest update. Not only was SA range great but so were speeds. Even on 1 bar of n41 I was seeing upwards of 100Mbps. I'm really enjoying all of the improvements standalone 5G is bringing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Mapped a bunch of the North Shore/Gold Coast on Cellmapper because I noticed that it was undermapped specifically for AT&T. I managed to log a couple of sites that weren't mapped before as well as locate a bunch that were significantly off from their locations due to being seen super far away. For example, the pin for AT&T eNB 115975 sat unconfirmed for 6 years and was stuck on the Throgs Neck Bridge but in reality it was 5.5 miles away in Sands Point. Another good example was eNB 110233 which was unconfirmed since 2020 and it's pin was stuck in Larchmont, NY when in reality the site was 6.5 miles across the Long Island Sound in Port Washington.

As far as my experience with mapping AT&T and T-Mobile goes, what I've found is that pretty much each of the Big 3 are collocated on all of the same macros throughout the region. This means that in most areas you'll have similar coverage no matter what carrier you're on. What makes the difference in performance is how much spectrum is available. In the areas where only lowband reaches, AT&T is faster than T-Mobile at similar signal strengths due to AT&T having 10MHz Band 12/14/n5 whereas T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 12 and 15MHz n71. If you're within range of midband though T-Mobile absolutely clobbers AT&T.

The only areas where the carriers aren't collocated are the downtowns/commercial areas of the towns, villages, and hamlets of the North Shore. In those areas, T-Mobile had n41 90% of the time whereas AT&T barely had any C-band coverage. When I did connect, it was decently fast at ~250Mbps but in those same areas I'd be seeing >700Mbps on T-Mobile.

Another thing that separates T-Mobile and Verizon from AT&T is the use of small cells. All throughout the North Shore you'll find T-Mobile and Verizon small cells that fill in coverage where macros can't simply don't reach. With AT&T that isn't the case at all. It's a surprising departure from their m/o in NYC where they seemingly deploy 3 small cells for every macro. The best example of this difference in performance is Oyster Bay Road and Chicken Valley Road in Mill Neck and Matinecock. Both of these roads are barely covered by the macros that are meant to serve them. On AT&T I was seeing signals as low as -125dbm on Band 14 with throughput of <1Mbps, often cutting out completely. On T-Mobile in these same areas I was getting a strong signal and ~200Mbps thanks to all of the small cells.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

T-Mobile eliminated the 10MHz Band 41 carrier in Suffolk County and is now running 150MHz n41. Here's a screenshot of the 50MHz second carrier. I'm guessing it'll make its way west toward NYC in the coming weeks.

sC1Yra2.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Today I was driving over in Bothell/Kenmore area. I noticed the site which used to host Sprint eNB 745953 (where Waynita Way NE turns into 100th Ave NE) before it was fully decommissioned last year is now hosting all new T-Mobile gear. The gear isn't live yet but is fully installed. My guess is they plan to decommission the T-Mobile B2/B66 (enB 84647) only site a few blocks up the hill. This is a great move because decommissioning that old site would reduce interference with eNB 84740/175124. At the same time, the new location should notably improve coverage in the geographically shielded area along Waynita/100th.  The weird thing is I can't find a permit for this anywhere!
    • Mint and Ultra: Welcome to the T-Mobile Family! https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-closes-acquisition-mint-and-ultra-mobile
    • https://www.t-mobile.com/2023-annual-report Most items s4gru members will be aware of, but an interesting read.
    • I've now seen 100 MHz n77 from SoftBank and 100 MHz n78 from NTT. NTT seems to be a bit better south of Osaka, though in some cases it drops down to B19 LTE as some areas around here are pretty rural. SoftBank has n77 around, but it's flakey enough that I switched eSIMs earlier this morning.
    • I'm currently typing this from a bullet train headed from Tokyo to Osaka. Using a roaming eSIM rather than T-Mobile as it's a lot cheaper, but I'll start with T-Mobile's roaming experience. Since I have a business line, I can't add data packs online, so I'm just using the 256 kbps baseline service you get by default. That service runs on Softank 4G. SoftBank has a well-built-out LTE network though, with plenty of B41, falling back to B1/3/8 as needed. 5G roaming from T-Mobile doesn't appear to exist though. I've seen 20+10 MHz B41 when I've looked, generally speaking. WiFi calling works well, and voice calls over LTE work fine too (I forgot to turn WiFi back on after doing some testing, so I expect my bill to be a dollar more next month). I want to say I even got HD voice over the cell network for the VoLTE call I did. I have a bunch of eSIMs and a couple of physical SIMs to try out. I've gotten the eSIMs up and running, but last I checked the physical SIM wasn't working even after activation so I'll run through eSIMs for the moment and update this thread with pSIM info and details on not-Tokyo in the coming days. First off, there's US Mobile's complimentary East Asia eSIM (5GB) that I grabbed before my unlimited plan Stateside expired. That SIM uses SIM Club, routing through Singapore, running on SoftBank LTE and 5G. I've seen 40 MHz n77, as well as 10x10 n28, and have seen download speeds in excess of 200 Mbps with uploads of more than 50 Mbps, though typical speeds are slower. Routing is via Equinix/Packet.net. 5G coverage is rather spotty, but LTE is plenty fast enough; either my phone doesn't want to use the 5G band combos that have more coverage or 5G coverage is just spottier here than in the US (at least on T-Mibile). Latency is as low as 95ms to sites in Singapore (usually closer to 120ms), which is pretty great considering the 3300 mi between Tokyo and Singapore. Next there's Ubigi. It also routes through Singapore via Transatel (despite being owned by NTT), and sites on top of NTT docomo's network. I didn't see NTT 5G in Tokyo when I tested it, but since then I've seen 10x10 n28, and have seen B1/B3/B19 on the LTE side. So far it's not the fastest thing out there, but I'm guessing coverage will be a little better...or maybe not. This was $17 for 10GB. Latency is a bit higher to Singapore, but still under 150ms it seems. Then there's Airalo, which was the cheapest when I bought it at $9 for 10GB. It also routes through Singapore (on Singtel), but on my S24 I have my pick of KDDI (au) or SoftBank. KDDI has extensive B41 coverage and I've seen 20+20 with UL CA. While waiting for the train at HND Terminal 3 (Keikyu line) I hit 250+ Mbps down and 10+ Mbps up...over LTE...with pretty respectable latency numbers (not much above 100ms). This is in adition to supporting SoftBank, also on LTE (my S24 defaulted to KDDI, while my wife's Pixel 8 defaulted to SoftBank and didn't seem to want to connect to KDDI). Of the various carriers mentioned, I'd say this was the best pick, though prices have bumped back up to $18 for the 10GB plan...but it's probably still what I'd pick if I had to pick just one carrier. Then there's Saily, which uses Truphone out of Hong Kong. I haven't used this as much, as I only grabbed 3GB for $7. It runs on NTT but doesn't seem to have 5G access and doesn't seem to have as good speeds. Yes, Hong Kong is way closer to Japan, but latency didn't seem to be any better, at ~150ms. In all cases, I've had reception even in train tunnels and even at high speed on the bullet train, on all three carriers I've tried (I don't think I'll be able to play with a Rakuten SIM, which is rather disappointing). There have been cases where service has degraded, but it looks like you'd have reasonable cell service no matter which of the big three carriers you picked...and since T-Mobile roams on one of them, that's good enough if you're content to buy day passes.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...