Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Preview (LG D820)


MacinJosh
 Share

Recommended Posts

So do we expect to see a Nexus 5 available on all carriers this time around?  It was kinda sad to see the Nexus 4 only available to Tmobile last year.

 

I'm expecting it based on what I see in this thread. Its down between the Nexus 5 and Note 3 for me now!

 

Edit: I do hope if they bring a nexus back to CDMA carriers, that they work out some kind of deal to get the devices fully supported in AOSP, and updates pushed by Google would be nice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious question: given the hedging on the meaning of the band certifications (quoted below), what are the odds this will be a Sprint device? Are any of these bands unique to Sprint and unlikely to be in a non-Sprint phone? Is this device intended to work across all carriers?

 

Interpretation from the more knowledgeable is appreciated!

 

The FCC authorization docs show tests run for CDMA2000 band class 10 and LTE band class 41.  Those are practically unique to Sprint, especially in combination.

 

Additionally, LTE bands 4, 5, and 17 are included, covering AT&T and T-Mobile.  The outlier in the tests is LTE band class 13.  It is currently unique to VZW and was not included.

 

So, if this a new Nexus 5, maybe Google is getting back at VZW for screwing over previous Nexus handsets.

 

AJ

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FCC authorization docs show tests run for CDMA2000 band class 10 and LTE band class 41.  Those are practically unique to Sprint, especially in combination.

 

Additionally, LTE bands 4, 5, and 17 are included, covering AT&T and T-Mobile.  The outlier in the tests is LTE band class 13.  It is currently unique to VZW and was not included.

 

So, if this a new Nexus 5, maybe Google is getting back at VZW for screwing over previous Nexus handsets.

 

AJ

 

It is kind of strange they didn't just bump it up to hexaband for a nationwide nexus model. Unless there was simply no room? Or maybe Sprint agreed to terms that Verizon wouldn't agree to?  Like perhaps being sold only through the play store? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is kind of strange they didn't just bump it up to hexaband for a nationwide nexus model. (Unless there was simply no room?)

 

It could be a political decision, retribution for VZW.  Or it could be a technical reason, since band class 13 is the only one of the bunch that has an inverted FDD downlink/uplink.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

write the article before every other Android blog gets wind of this.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

Considering 80% of the people reading this article are guests, I'm assuming they already know.  :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just to head off the question posse, no, this mystery handset does not support SVDO nor SVLTE.

 

AJ

 

I just read this lol. Well, at least the possibility of LTE roaming takes the edge off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That WOULD be awesome if this device opened up a new era of cross-country roaming on and between ALL carriers of some sort. (but that would be way too good to be true, I am sure).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FCC authorization docs show tests run for CDMA2000 band class 10 and LTE band class 41.  Those are practically unique to Sprint, especially in combination.

 

Additionally, LTE bands 4, 5, and 17 are included, covering AT&T and T-Mobile.  The outlier in the tests is LTE band class 13.  It is currently unique to VZW and was not included.

 

So, if this a new Nexus 5, maybe Google is getting back at VZW for screwing over previous Nexus handsets.

 

AJ

 

What did Verizon do in the past that rubbed Google in the wrong way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Galaxy Nexus updates.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

 

What do you mean by that?  Verizon held up speedier Nexus updates on the Galaxy Nexus and ruined part of the image of a Nexus device?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you mean by that? Verizon held up speedier Nexus updates on the Galaxy Nexus and ruined part of the image of a Nexus device?

Verizon insisted on bloating the device up with Verizon specific apps instead of letting it be pure Google so having a nexus on Verizon kind of killed the pure Google experience.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon insisted on bloating the device up with Verizon specific apps instead of letting it be pure Google so having a nexus on Verizon kind of killed the pure Google experience.

 

Wow.  Well in that case, I hope Google screws over Verizon and not offer the Nexus 5 to them and make them beg for mercy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.  Well in that case, I hope Google screws over Verizon and not offer the Nexus 5 to them and make them beg for mercy.

They won't beg for mercy, from what I understand Nexus devices don't sell that well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this article in another thread, but it kinda makes sense here to. Its an article on google's strategy on updating android devices regardless of what the carrier does. So even if the CDMA chip used to be an issue updating the CDMA nexus is the past, this goes a long way into alleviating customers need to update. So maybe Google doesn't mind getting into bed with Sprint again. (not sure why they are leaving Verizon out though)

 

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/09/balky-carriers-and-slow-oems-step-aside-google-is-defragging-android/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is fine.  Google should just have it available for Tmobile, Sprint and ATT.

Oh I absolutely agree, I just know that Verizon won't be crying over not getting the whatever the call the next Nexus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • S4GRU changed the title to Google Nexus 5 by LG Preview (LG D820)
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Edit: Disregard, what I previously posted here was a previously starred bug.  
    • This convert site is funny to me. T-Mobile reserved a pole at this same intersection for a small cell in Dec 2017, finally installed it in July 2020, only for the small cell to be planned for decommissioning a little less than 1 and a half years later thanks to a convert site. It looks like the roof was rebuilt/re-enforced for the new setup too. The roof line is a little higher at the front of the building with new bricks.
    • Or, more simply, have a physical SIM that I can just move from one device to another.  Problem [already] solved.  Carrier doesn't have to be involved at any point in the process. I'll be among many (I'm sure) who will be glad to know if you see it.  Here in the DC area, Dish hasn't really done much yet.  I think I've seen some Dish gear around Richmond, but nothing here. - Trip
    • I like VICE.  They actually report on news no one else is willing to report. A lot of the places they go no sane person would want to be there.  They put their life on the line in many cases to get a story. From stories about the avocado wars in Mexico, being in the front lines against ISIS and Ukraine, to being embedded with terrorist organizations.   FAA might have some conspiracy 5G nut on their team or something.  At work ever year we have some one come in and say "hey, can you turn off the WIFI in my room? I don't want its radiation".  It doesn't make sense and their reasoning is always uneducated conspiracy. I can see someone coming into my office and acting crazy over C band disregarding everything else.
    • I think on esims it depends on how they implement it. If you can freely activate them on one phone while having it loaded on many that would be great.   I will let you know when I see Boost Mobile native 5g live here. So far no sign of even the plmn being active which I figure will be my first indicator. I look at changing networks with the TNX Sim and seem to get a full list of all carriers and their alternate plmns.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...