Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Preview (LG D820)


Recommended Posts

Posted

I would pick this over the galaxy note 3 if this is actually coming to sprint. Fingers crossed

Especially with a $299 price point from the Google play store. I'd be all over it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

  • Like 2
Posted

Here's an updated comparison! Didn't expect this to blow up when I was in class!
1ETQzow.jpg

 

 

Oh and guys remember when Google filed to use BRS / EBS frequency for a private wireless network earlier this year? Now we know why! 

  • Like 3
Posted

Imagine a no contract, triband, nexus device with a kitkat bar on the side. I'm dreaming deep tonight when I hit the sheets:-D

  • Like 7
Posted

So far Engadget, Verge, DroidLife, phandroid, phonedog, anandtech and Mobilesyrup has given s4gru credit for the story. Everyone else gave it to Engadget (which is fine since they credited back here)

 

http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/05/lg-nexus-5-fcc/

 

http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/5/4699734/the-lg-nexus-5-with-lte-may-have-appeared-at-the-fcc

 

http://www.droid-life.com/2013/09/05/lg-made-possible-nexus-5-hits-fcc-model-name-d820/

 

http://mobilesyrup.com/2013/09/05/lg-nexus-5-possibly-sneaks-into-the-fcc-packing-lte/

 

http://phandroid.com/2013/09/05/lg-d820-fcc-nexus-5/

 

http://www.phonedog.com/2013/09/05/lg-d820-appears-in-the-fcc-with-wide-range-of-lte-support-may-be-google-s-new-nexus-phone/

 

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7283/potential-nexus-5-fcc-disclosure-reappears-lgd820

 

I tipped off the tier 1 blogs and made sure to prominently mention S4GRU, so I'd hope they give proper credit. Dieter Bohn was particularly classy in mentioning S4GRU in the second sentence. Engadget was the first to act just a few minutes after I gave them the tip so they seem to have the most linkbacks.

  • Like 7
Posted

Hope they don't hold the trend with the same garbage baseband chipsets.

It's made by LG, so I hope they won't use the crappy VIA chipsets.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

Posted

2300mah batter seems pretty small especially for the screen size and the fact that its not removable

Posted

2300mah batter seems pretty small especially for the screen size and the fact that its not removable

I agree, but Nexus batteries have always been small. Gotta get the bill of materials down to meet that $300 price point I guess... ;-)
Posted

But the dimensions are way off for the size of the device seen in the video.

By comparison the Nexus 4 is 133.9 x 68.7 mm

The LG D820 alleged Nexus 5 is 131.9 x 68.2 mm

 

Is it common practice for manufacturers to send prototypes to the FCC and make changes to the final design?

As long as they do not change internals in the way that would require devices to be recertified by the FCC ie operating bands or whatever else the FCC looks for.

Posted

LGOG is 131.9 mm x 68.9 mm so this would be actually slightly narrower & exactly the same height.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Posted

But the dimensions are way off for the size of the device seen in the video.

By comparison the Nexus 4 is 133.9 x 68.7 mm

The LG D820 alleged Nexus 5 is 131.9 x 68.2 mm

 

Is it common practice for manufacturers to send prototypes to the FCC and make changes to the final design?

As long as they do not change internals in the way that would require devices to be recertified by the FCC ie operating bands or whatever else the FCC looks for.

Oh yeah look at that. Well I hope it is really the smaller size.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Posted

Nope, MSM8974.

 

...aka Snapdragon 800 to the commoners.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Posted

...aka Snapdragon 800 to the commoners.

 

;)

 

AJ

Yes, you are exactly right. However I will avoid the term "Snapdragon 800" like the plague because it is a tier, not a specific chip.

Posted

LGOG is 131.9 mm x 68.9 mm so this would be actually slightly narrower & exactly the same height.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4

I think your missing my point.

The device leaked in the KitKat video looked to be similarly sized as Optimus Pro / Note 2.

Posted

The Wall may crumble under the load.  Our article is getting over 500 hits per hour tonight.  We may top 4000 views by midnight MDT.

 

AJ

  • Like 17
Posted

The Wall may crumble under the load.  Our article is getting over 500 hits per hour tonight.  We may top 4000 views by midnight MDT.

 

AJ

 

Great job AJ!  :tu:

Posted

The Wall may crumble under the load. Our article is getting over 500 hits per hour tonight. We may top 4000 views by midnight MDT.

 

AJ

Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Or both?

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Posted

I think your missing my point.

The device leaked in the KitKat video looked to be similarly sized as Optimus Pro / Note 2.

Yeah I hadn't seen your post when I posted... I agree, I thought from the picture it would be using the panel from the G Pro but evidently not. Or something doesn't add up.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Posted

The Wall may crumble under the load.  Our article is getting over 500 hits per hour tonight.  We may top 4000 views by midnight MDT.

 

AJ

No AJ, that's your article (with credit given to Tim Yu, as well). Thank You, Sir!  :tu:

Posted

Well I was dead set on the Note 3.. up until this surfaced. Anxious to see what gets announced!

 

Edit: Some one at MacRumors put the dimensions together and put out a quick drawing. Looks completely plausible and enticing.

 

http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=17839114&postcount=66

I was set on the LG G2 but, this through a wrench in my gears. However, I'm glad to have this (tough) decision to make.

Posted

This entire article made my night :-D I've been spreading it as well, so I hope I'm not a contributing factor in your servers crashing if they do :-D Keep up the good work ;-)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was it like only 1.2MB?  I had a tiny one last night but no date change as I was already on November here.
    • Nov 1 play system system update.
    • A new apartment building in my neighborhood is getting a 4G/5G DAS installed. No idea if it's going to be carrier agnostic or if it's going to be just for one carrier. The antennas they are using cover the full range of spectrum from 600MHz-4.9GHz so no telling by equipment alone. I noticed a ton of Cat6E ethernet being run in the garage a couple of days back and then I saw a guy running the ethernet through the ceiling yesterday and didn't think to ask what for until I noticed this antenna this morning mounted on a wall outside near the ramp but with nothing connected to it at the moment.     The garage attendant told me that the phones that are provided to them by the parking management company are on Verizon and they're the only carrier without coverage down there so the building management told them that they're "installing something to fix it". So as far as I know, this will work on Verizon but I'm curious to see who else will get a boost too. — — — — — Without exaggerating, I have mapped a new at least one new small cell on my way to work every day this week. I don't know who the regional network managers for NYC and Boston are, but other cities need to take a page from their book about small cell buildouts. And it's not just upgrades of existing small cells, it's new ones too. Not to mention pings near 10ms on all of them.
    • Yep, 562.51MB December 1 sec patch just found here tonight as well. 
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...