Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

yes, however they could still could have kept legacy voice tech going during the transition, with V+D LTE ready for when the coverage is ready.

 

And no VOLTE is not the same as a dedicated or dynamic voice channel DTM'd or multiplexed over the connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding HSPA, per wiki UMTS release 7 supports voice over HSPA

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Mobile_Telecommunications_System

 

 


Release 7
  • Enhanced L2
  • 64 QAM, MIMO
  • Voice over HSPA
  • CPC – continuous packet connectivity
  • FRLC – Flexible RLC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

regarding HSPA, per wiki UMTS release 7 supports voice over HSPA

 

Of course.  But no operator, as far as I know, has implemented the back end to support it.  The only current options are for third party VoIP apps.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick news.google search let me know that the T-Mobile and Verizon GN3 have passed thru FCC... we can't be much further behind!  I would think any delay would be good for us (final touches on tri-band maybe)...

 

EDIT: wouldn't it be nice if the GN3 launch (or any others) proceeded like the iPhone did?  Press release. FCC docs open up. Pre-order in three days.  Buy in 10 days. Apple totally has that down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EA quick news.google search let me know that the T-Mobile and Verizon GN3 have passed thru FCC... we can't be much further behind!  I would think any delay would be good for us (final touches on tri-band maybe)...

Every one of them passed through the FCC except the Sprint variant. I'm hoping our variant is NOT this one 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=134996&fcc_id=A3LSMN900P

 

It has mention of band class 10 for CDMA (SMR), and LTE band 25 (PCS G) along with GSM radios. 

 

I don't think this is our device however, because our variant should be A3LSMN900S.

 

Edit: If it is the Sprint variant, well, no triband for us

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every one of them passed through the FCC except the Sprint variant. I'm hoping our variant is NOT this one 

https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=Exhibits&RequestTimeout=500&calledFromFrame=N&application_id=134996&fcc_id=A3LSMN900P

 

It has mention of band class 10 for CDMA (SMR), and LTE band 25 (PCS G) along with GSM radios. 

 

I don't think this is our device however, because our variant should be A3LSMN900S.

 

Edit: If it is the Sprint variant, well, no triband for us

 

Yikes! That could be couldn't it??? I see three bands of CDMA (PCS and two in the 800's) and only one of LTE (PCS)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per androidauthority.com, here are the following variants of the Note 3. This article was made before IFA, so it is old news but has the model numbers that Samsung is using.

 

SM-N900 – base International Version of device based on Exynos SoC
SM-N9005 – international version based on Snapdragon SoC (probably Snapdragon 800)
SM-N900A – U.S. AT&T Version of Device
SM-N900T – T-Mobile Version
SM-N900V – Verizon Version
SM-N900S – Sprint Version
SM-N900R4 – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant (Rogers?), or simply test version passed to the testers
SM-N900P – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant.

 

Source: http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-note-3-mini-anyone-three-different-sizes-249412/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be great... And I figured it would end in an S anyways...

 

Still very curious on this "P" model... I am trying to figure out if the 2nd band in the 800's listed in SMR or not...

 

EDIT: I do not see the "lower" 800 stuff on the CDMA page -- only on the summary page -- so I guess that would make it definately not a Sprint phone... (total guesses as this stuff is Greek to me)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per androidauthority.com, here are the following variants of the Note 3. This article was made before IFA, so it is old news but has the model numbers that Samsung is using.

 

SM-N900 – base International Version of device based on Exynos SoC

SM-N9005 – international version based on Snapdragon SoC (probably Snapdragon 800)

SM-N900A – U.S. AT&T Version of Device

SM-N900T – T-Mobile Version

SM-N900V – Verizon Version

SM-N900S – Sprint Version

SM-N900R4 – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant (Rogers?), or simply test version passed to the testers

SM-N900P – Unknown, but probably another carrier variant.

 

The "R4" has USCC and C Spire written all over it, as it is only CDMA2000/LTE.  No GSM/W-CDMA.

 

Like it or not, my guess is that the "P" variant is for Sprint.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "R4" has USCC and C Spire written all over it, as it is only CDMA2000/LTE.  No GSM/W-CDMA.

 

Like it or not, my guess is that the "P" variant is for Sprint.

 

AJ

I hope you are wrong. If this is the sprint version.. I guess I will have to hold my breath for the htcone..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the "P" variant does support SVLTE.  So, my theory on the oversized Note 3 possibly sticking with single band LTE to maintain simultaneous CDMA1X voice and LTE may prove true.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this P one is NOT sprint, what else could it be?

 

C Spire is probably your only hope, but even that does make much sense.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen guys, everything is up in the air right now. The P variant may be Sprint or it may not. We won't know anything until the SM-N900S passes the FCC. 

 

That assumes there is an "S" variant submitted to the FCC OET.  We shall see.  But all of this has occurred in the last few hours.  I queried the FCC OET earlier today and found nothing new.  Josh, our FCC OET reporter, has not chimed in, so I may need to check if he has been asleep at his desk or playing video games again.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I initially checked the FCC, the Verizon "V", T-mobile "T", "R4", "P" and "W8" variants were already released. Around 4 PM Eastern time, the AT&T "A" variant trickled in. I was hoping the "S" variant would drop by, but it didn't. And as AJ mentioned, if there is an "S" variant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen guys, everything is up in the air right now. The P variant may be Sprint or it may not. We won't know anything until the SM-N900S passes the FCC.

 

the S might not, if it does not exist.. But yeah, I am not gonna worry about it until something official comes out..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...