Jump to content

IPv6 support


Recommended Posts

Any plans for Sprint to implement IPv6 once it finishes the NV rollout? I went to test-ipv6.com on my HTC One and it couldn't detect any.

 

Also, I thought IPv6 was mandatory for LTE, or was I mistaken? I know Verizon mandated IPv6 support in their devices before they started their LTE rollout.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great question! I did a little poking around and unfortunately there's very little information regarding Sprint's wireless network and IPv6. Their Tier 1 network is of course fully compliant by now but that's the only concrete info I could find. I did come across a press release dated 2007 indicating that Sprint has been working on IPv6 since 1997  :D and a PowerPoint talking about Sprint beginning deployment on their wireless network in 2013. I also found a few random forum discussions that seem to agree there's no intent to upgrade the legacy network to IPv6 but the LTE network of course will be.

 

The mandatory rule you're thinking of might be the one required by the ITU for "true 4G" but there's no such requirement for LTE alone that I'm aware of.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe my wife's Photon Q was pulling an IPv6 address when I was looking at the debug screens the other day.  I'll check again and try to grab a screenshot if my memory serves me correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the advantages of using IPV6 besides greater number of ip addresses?

 

At this point, being able to access IPv6-only websites (since we're close to or have already run out of IPv4).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is something I've also been curious about. 

 

If you can pullup that IpV6 address would be interesting to see if it's a real IPv6 address. I think most devices that support ipv6 assing themselves a generic IP address in the ipv6 realm even if the network doesn't give it one, just like many devices do with a v4 address. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I checked her phone again and it has an IPv6 address, but it is on a screen differing from the EVDO/eHRPD/LTE screen.  Those are all IPv4 addresses.  I need to get the name of the screen that has that address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

The easiest way to know if you have a publicly routed IPv6 address (IMO) is to go to a RIR homepage.  For most of us it is www.arin.net.  They have an applet that runs at the top that tells you your IPv6 (or IPv4) address.   IPv4 address = no IPv6 connectivity.

 

Separately, it might be good to email this address:

 

ipv6-support@sprint.net

 

about IPv6 in Sprint's cellular networks.  Based on one press release from 2010 they planned IPv6 deployment in 2012.  Clearly that hasn't happened.  

Edited by jonesnco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also found a few random forum discussions that seem to agree there's no intent to upgrade the legacy network to IPv6 but the LTE network of course will be.

 

Would IPv6 work as long as I'm on an NV tower (even if not LTE)? Or is EVDO/CDMA IPv4 only by design?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Separately, it might be good to email this address:

 

ipv6-support@sprint.net

 

about IPv6 in Sprint's cellular networks.  Based on one press release from 2010 they planned IPv6 deployment in 2012.  Clearly that hasn't happened.  

 

You did inspire me to send a note to that address. We shall see if that helps, but every vote counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Would IPv6 work as long as I'm on an NV tower (even if not LTE)? Or is EVDO/CDMA IPv4 only by design?

 

 

I think it is safe to say since LTE has been designed with support for IPv6 in mind, the legacy manufacturers might not be updating their devices to support IPv6. IPv6 support exists in revisions to the 3GPP standards but it was up to the equipment manufactures to implement it and carriers to route it. Since the carriers are deploying LTE anyway their need to demand support from a non-supporting 3G equipment manufacturer is pretty low. Your success with a non-LTE tower would depend on the 3G manufacturer's support for IPv6 AND the carrier's willingness to enable it AND route the IPv6 traffic AND the phone supporting IPv6 over the cellular interface connecting to that tower. I suspect the chances are low but that isn't an area I work in so there is a good deal of guessing there.

 

On an iPhone 4 (IOS 6) I don't see anything in the iPhone's GPRS interface for an IPv6 address while the WiFi interface has IPv6 enabled and configures a global address when on an IPv6-enabled network. My guess is IPv6 isn't enabled (and maybe isn't even an option) on the GPRS interface on that phone otherwise I should see a link-local address but no global address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the advantages of using IPV6 besides greater number of ip addresses?

You will get better data managment, more secure, video and sound will run a lot smoother with less latency. This is just a few details, Ip v6 is huge. I teach a 5 day course on it and don't think I cover even a quarter of what it can actually do.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You did inspire me to send a note to that address. We shall see if that helps, but every vote counts.

And I did receive a reply from that address:

 

 Regretfully this mailbox can provide you no answers on Sprint PCS wireless schedule as the team's members are engineers supporting IPv6 on our commercial router networks and are not privy to PCS wireless solution deployment planning. I took a quick look at the sprint.com web site and for the content I could find there, it was in reference to IPv6 deployment on our Internet, MPLS and Peerless IP router networks. Sprint is completing MPLS IPv6 launch this year which would insure that networks our wireless network uses are supporting IPv6, and ready for PCS IPv6 future plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Pestered Sprint for....quite some time.  Apparently Spark is the key.  Spark-enabled phones in Spark supported areas should be dual-stack.  Unsure how things like Happy Eyeballs might work.  Sadly, my phone isn't supported, my area isn't listed as having or to be getting Spark in the near-term so I can't test this from a store and the closest city to try and test is a 3 hour drive away.

 

Anyone here willing to try it?  Easiest test IMO is just go to http://ip6.me and click the 'IPv6 only test' link since depending on how preference for one protocol over another is implemented might affect the test to the main page and end up using IPv4.  If IPv6 isn't working you should get a server not found error (or the like).  If it does work, an IPv6 address.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pestered Sprint for....quite some time.  Apparently Spark is the key.  Spark-enabled phones in Spark supported areas should be dual-stack.  Unsure how things like Happy Eyeballs might work.  Sadly, my phone isn't supported, my area isn't listed as having or to be getting Spark in the near-term so I can't test this from a store and the closest city to try and test is a 3 hour drive away.

 

Anyone here willing to try it?  Easiest test IMO is just go to http://ip6.me and click the 'IPv6 only test' link since depending on how preference for one protocol over another is implemented might affect the test to the main page and end up using IPv4.  If IPv6 isn't working you should get a server not found error (or the like).  If it does work, an IPv6 address.

 

I'm pretty sure any recent Android phone is dual-stack, but not necessarily on LTE. I was tunneling IPv6 at home for a bit and test-ipv6.com was working on my HTC One (which isn't Spark capable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 3 months later...

After testing in Dallas using an GS5 (which I was told supported dual-stack in Spark areas) running 4.4.4 and verifying I was in a strong Spark area, I found no evidence the phone was using IPv6 over the cellular interface. The same phone does IPv6 over wifi regularly so the local stack isn't an issue. This is very disappointing and contrary to what I was told by Sprint's exec office in Aug 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T LTE still does not use IPv6 anywhere I've ever seen yet, either. I'm still not sure what the advantage is other than not running out of IP addresses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My iphone 5S pulls IPv6 pages from my WIFI just fine but when connected to the Sprint data network, it uses IPv4 only.

 

Here is a list of IPv6 only pages that someone compiled.

 

http://ipv6.cybernode.com/list-of-ipv6-only-sites

 

Unless you are on a dual-stack IPv4 and IPv6, you cannot access those sites.  Here is a video with why we need IPv6 soon.

 

https://www.arin.net/knowledge/deploying_ipv6/index.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually spent significant time getting IPv6 working on my home connection. test-ipv6.com gives me 10/10 and I think I can turn off IPv4 on my laptop and be able to access IPv6 only websites with no issue (currently untested).  :D

 

Would be nice if Sprint supported it though, but they may be thinking that CGNAT would be perfectly fine for phones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My iphone 5S pulls IPv6 pages from my WIFI just fine but when connected to the Sprint data network, it uses IPv4 only.

 

Here is a list of IPv6 only pages that someone compiled.

 

http://ipv6.cybernode.com/list-of-ipv6-only-sites

 

Unless you are on a dual-stack IPv4 and IPv6, you cannot access those sites.  Here is a video with why we need IPv6 soon.

 

https://www.arin.net/knowledge/deploying_ipv6/index.html

the IPV6 website does not load on my PC. is it down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the IPV6 website does not load on my PC. is it down?

The first site in the list (cybermod) will only load if you have IPv6 on the device that is trying to load it.  That site itself is an example of an IPv6 only site.  You must not have a working IPv6 path to the internet on your home computer.  I suggest you go to: http://test-ipv6.com and test your computer to see if it has both IPv4 and IPv6 stacks running with connectivity to the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...