Jump to content

New Nexus 7 thread (was "Second-gen Google Nexus 7 coming in July for $229")


kckid

Recommended Posts

Why is Sprint LTE absent?

Because unlike Sprint LTE, Google doesn't need Verizon's permission to get it working on the network. Verizon is mandated by law to accept it (which is why there's no CDMA, which doesn't follow this rule). Also, Sprint doesn't offer SIM cards by themselves like GSM/UMTS/LTE operators (and Verizon) do. 

 

Thus, it would be pointless because Sprint doesn't have the facilities to enable that. However, it could be easily upgraded in the future, since Bands 2 and 5 are already present. A simple manufacturing swap on the duplexer/filter for PCS would allow Band 25, and another swap on Cellular would permit Band 26 support. I think Google is waiting for Sprint to have the capability to support SIM-free devices. I'm not sure Sprint ever will in its current state.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because unlike Sprint LTE, Google doesn't need Verizon's permission to get it working on the network. Verizon is mandated by law to accept it (which is why there's no CDMA, which doesn't follow this rule). Also, Sprint doesn't offer SIM cards by themselves like GSM/UMTS/LTE operators (and Verizon) do.

 

Thus, it would be pointless because Sprint doesn't have the facilities to enable that. However, it could be easily upgraded in the future, since Bands 2 and 5 are already present. A simple manufacturing swap on the duplexer/filter for PCS would allow Band 25, and another swap on Cellular would permit Band 26 support. I think Google is waiting for Sprint to have the capability to support SIM-free devices. I'm not sure Sprint ever will in its current state.

Is Sprint gonna get its ass in gear? If it's trying to be number 1, this isn't how Sprint should be behaving.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Sprint gonna get its ass in gear? If it's trying to be number 1, this isn't how Sprint should be behaving.

I believe Sprint's current systems still tie the user identity to the phone identity, which makes it very problematic to offer SIM-only plans. Now that Sprint technically offers removable SIMs (as part of device sales, though), it should be working on that (or have already done so, mostly).

 

It took a lot of work for Verizon to redo its entire system to be able to do that, and part of that work resulted in the Share Everything plans. When you use a Share Everything plan, the newer account management scheme is used, which decouples the device identity from the user identity in the line on the service account. Of course, you don't really see the difference, because it's a backend change.

 

AT&T and T-Mobile have had these capabilities in their systems for years, as they needed to support them for international and prepaid users.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Sprint LTE :(

 

 

-Luis

It's a shame too, when I heard that it would have such wide LTE support, I was quite hopeful. Maybe a new Sprint model down the line (he wished).

Why is Sprint LTE absent?

 

I am not sure why you guys are so surprised.  The new Nexus 7 LTE variant(s) showed up in the FCC OET several weeks ago.  No band 25 LTE 1900.  Otherwise, we would have let you know.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This could be a disadvantage for Sprint in the future. Not only does Sprint have two bands nobody else will be using, they are also the only carrier that doesn't support sim swapping. That isn't a very good mix for having a nice variety of devices to choose from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This could be a disadvantage for Sprint in the future. Not only does Sprint have two bands nobody else will be using, they are also the only carrier that doesn't support sim swapping. That isn't a very good mix for having a nice variety of devices to choose from.

That's not entirely accurate. Band 25 = Band 2 + G block so devices can just have band 25 instead of band 2 which other 3 ARE using. Band 26 = Band 5 + ESMR (same as above 25)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not entirely accurate. Band 25 = Band 2 + G block so devices can just have band 25 instead of band 2 which other 3 ARE using. Band 26 = Band 5 + ESMR (same as above 25)

 

You're right. Regardless though, Sprint still has 2500 TD-LTE that nobody else will be using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. Regardless though, Sprint still has 2500 TD-LTE that nobody else will be using.

Longterm that's an advantage cause that means no one else can offer those speeds. Sprint is 50mil subs. That may not be Verizon/ATT but combined with Softy, no one's gonna dick around on unreasonable device costs for Sprint.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many people use a cell connected tablet though?

Watch a few videos and the cell plan limit is reached, too spendy.

 

I'm waiting until the reviews come out about the nexus7.

My nexus7-1 is very laggy due to the cheap flash memory they put in there, it is very frustrating to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many people use a cell connected tablet though?

Watch a few videos and the cell plan limit is reached, too spendy.

 

I'm waiting until the reviews come out about the nexus7.

My nexus7-1 is very laggy due to the cheap flash memory they put in there, it is very frustrating to use.

I blame Tegra :P

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear that the nexus 7 only supports Verizon LTE and no cdma so if this is true does that mean Google didn't give the nexus 7 sprint lte because there LTE is to spotty right now and there will be no 3G support?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear that the nexus 7 only supports Verizon LTE and no cdma so if this is true does that mean Google didn't give the nexus 7 sprint lte because there LTE is to spotty right now and there will be no 3G support?

It has nothing to do with how much Sprint coverage there is. It most likely has to do with Sprint's LTE band.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My nexus7-1 is very laggy due to the cheap flash memory they put in there, it is very frustrating to use.

 

My original 8 GB Nexus 7, which I have had since release, feels like it has slowed down considerably over the last year.  Is that likely a NAND issue?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CPU is fast enough, install a cpu monitor app, you'll see where the bottleneck is.

Are you referring to me? I've done a factory reset. It's still slow and sluggish, I don't know if it's the NAND or Tegra, but I've had two tegra devices and both have failed to stay modestly usable after a whole year.

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we even know if Sprint really pursued Google to produce a LTE version of the Nexus 7?  Yeah I guess I can buy that it could be a LTE band issue since its so unique but maybe Sprint is waiting to launch a tri-band LTE version of the Nexus 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you referring to me? I've done a factory reset. It's still slow and sluggish, I don't know if it's the NAND or Tegra, but I've had two tegra devices and both have failed to stay modestly usable after a whole year.

 

I've noticed the same thing with my Transformer. It started after Asus upgraded it to ICS so I thought that might've been the reason, if the tablet wasn't optimized for ICS. But maybe it's the Tegra 2 processor if other Tegra-based devices have similar issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed the same thing with my Transformer. It started after Asus upgraded it to ICS so I thought that might've been the reason, if the tablet wasn't optimized for ICS. But maybe it's the Tegra 2 processor if other Tegra-based devices have similar issues.

i honestly believe it's tegra. I've seen online complaints on the One X international that has the Tegra, and people complaining that it's slow and sluggish. I can't say for the US One X variant, but the EVO LTE on my line is working fine.

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read that its to do with the poor flash memory.

 

I have run the app called ForeverGone, which really does help but only for a short amount of time.

 

I'm hoping (wishfully) that 4.3 will fix it.

I downloaded and installed 4.3 the day it was available from the Google servers and it seems to be a lot faster and smoother. But I also factory reset it upon installation.

 

Sent from my Sprint Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone preordered the device?

 

As of three minutes ago, I have one in hand.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How? I read bestbuy is selling them early in stores.

 

Yes.  I have a bestbuy.com preorder and received an e-mail early this morning that its date had been upped to today.  Then, I checked in store availability and saw that my local Best Buy has them in stock.  So, I decided to jump my preorder, drive down to Best Buy, and see if I could really pick one up in person today.  Success.

 

2v9dbvb.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...