Jump to content

Motorola X Users Thread!


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

Looks like there is going to be a Motorola X phone coming later this year that is suppose to compete with the iPhones, Galaxy S, HTC One, LG Optimus series.  Hopefully it goes to all carriers and is slated for 2H 2013 release.  What this also means is that if it does come to Sprint, it will most likely be a tri-band LTE phone *woo hoo*.  Not that I would buy a Motorola product this time around due to my bias toward the lack of support on the Photon 4G but I am be happy to see more competition in the smartphone space.

If Motorola improves on how they treat their software updates, I may come back to Motorola in the future but certainly not in 2013.

 

http://www.technobuffalo.com/2013/05/29/moto-x-confirmed/

 

http://allthingsd.com/20130529/moto-x-coming-out-by-october-and-its-all-about-sensors-and-will-be-built-in-texas/

 

http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/29/motorola-chief-mentions-moto-x/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No tri-band, no sale. I'm still pissed off at Motorola for the way that they abandoned the original Photon anyway.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No tri-band, no sale. I'm still pissed off at Motorola for the way that they abandoned the original Photon anyway.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

Don't get me started.  I am still livid about the abandoned ICS project on the Photon.  Since its slated to be released in 2H 2013, it should have tri-band LTE so I am not so worried about that.  I think Sprint knows the importance of needing to begin releasing tri-band LTE phones on its flagship products.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No tri-band, no sale. I'm still pissed off at Motorola for the way that they abandoned the original Photon anyway.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Not to mention the poor radio performance they threw into the Photon Q. Definitely not the Motorola king of RF I grew up with.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention the poor radio performance they threw into the Photon Q. Definitely not the Motorola king of RF I grew up with.

 

Sent from my little Note2

 

I never looked up the RF performance of the Photon Q, but that explains some things. My wife's Photon Q seems to break up and get poor than expected reception in locations where it should perform well. I thought it might be defective unit and told her to take it in to the Sprint store, but as per usual she hasn't listened to me. 

 

Anyone else excited that it is "Assembled in USA"?

 

I am not sure how many people on this forum are aware where the items they purchase are made - it's a big deal for me.

 

Yeah I just read that it's going to be made in Texas and that is indeed a big deal. I do try to buy products that are made in the USA whenever possible; unfortunately with consumer electronics it's not usually possible. I suppose when they decide to release the second generation with tri-band support, I'll have to seriously consider them again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else excited that it is "Assembled in USA"?

 

I am not sure how many people on this forum are aware where the items they purchase are made - it's a big deal for me.

The comments regarding this made me LOL! They said it was basically Mexico since it's in Texas, I thought it was funny. If it doesn't affect cost I think it's a great thing, unfortunately American made products tend to be really expensive because of all of our workplace regulations that later translate into higher product prices. Ce la vie in 'Murica.

 

All in all, I think this is great for Moto, I think they have some of the best designed phones (aside from my HTC bias), they just need to work on the screen and provide a killer camera.

 

 

-Luis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never looked up the RF performance of the Photon Q, but that explains some things. My wife's Photon Q seems to break up and get poor than expected reception in locations where it should perform well. I thought it might be defective unit and told her to take it in to the Sprint store, but as per usual she hasn't listened to me. 

 

 

Yeah I just read that it's going to be made in Texas and that is indeed a big deal. I do try to buy products that are made in the USA whenever possible; unfortunately with consumer electronics it's not usually possible. I suppose when they decide to release the second generation with tri-band support, I'll have to seriously consider them again.

 

I don't know the numbers off hand but after seeing the poor numbers on the Note2 and then actually seeing the crazy real world performance of it, I don't pay attention to those numbers at all anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's tri-band, I'd probably pick one up. But it would depend on what other tri-band devices are out on the market around that time. I will not buy another device on contract or full retail price until tri-band phones are on the market. Although, at the rate Charlie Ergen is going, we may only need dual band.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not care where a phone is made as long as it is good quality and cost. If the United States cannot deliver that, then we need to up our game or be content with the trade. Not everything needs to be made in America; we should support a free market (mostly).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not care where a phone is made as long as it is good quality and cost. If the United States cannot deliver that, then we need to up our game or be content with the trade. Not everything needs to be made in America; we should support a free market (mostly).

 

I think you can support free markets and the ability to have the choice to purchase something made in America. I don't see these as contradictory philosophies.

 

Robert from Note 2 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not care where a phone is made as long as it is good quality and cost. If the United States cannot deliver that, then we need to up our game or be content with the trade. Not everything needs to be made in America; we should support a free market (mostly).

Yes, free trade, producing to comparative advantage, all good. All parts will be made overseas, but it is designed and built in the hands of USA workers. I think this is a huge step In the right direction considering it must have been a cost to benefit analysis checked move by Motorola in the first place. Id like to see others follow suit if the move bodes well for them.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not care where a phone is made as long as it is good quality and cost. If the United States cannot deliver that, then we need to up our game or be content with the trade. Not everything needs to be made in America; we should support a free market (mostly).

 

I always prefer a choice.  I educate myself on the options and pick the option that best fits my needs.

 

It's a complex discussion.

 

For the most part, the biggest issue with products made in USA isn't the cost/quality, it's finding that they exist.

 

For example, I recently went on a hunt for measuring cups - it's hard to find a set made in USA, but I found them (cost was roughly the same for a set made elsewhere).

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not everything needs to be made in America

 

Not everything needs to be made in China either...

 

we should support a free market (mostly).

 

"We" should? Call me crazy, but all things being relatively equal, I'd rather support American workers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"We" should? Call me crazy, but all things being relatively equal, I'd rather support American workers.

 

It is the ultimate example of free markets when the consumer has a choice to decide where they prefer to purchase their goods from. If an individual consumer wants to purchase products Made in America, then that's great! :tu:

 

I used to laugh at my grandparents for their exclusionary Made in America consumption. Now, I see things differently as I get older. I see that my consumption has helped people stay gainfully employed overseas. As factories and people have been laid off here. As a result, we don't even have a choice to purchase items made here in many product categories.

 

I applaud Motorola for attempting to make a phone in the U.S. If they can make a high quality phone for a competitive price, I can see it being a success. If I have a choice of two equal products, but one is Made in America, I will definitely support the American made product.

 

And in no terms would I not want someone who prefers a foreign made object to lose their choice, either. American companies and workers need to compete. And this example from Motorola is a free market competition. It's too bad Apple didn't try this. Something I've asked for a long time.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Apple's mobile devices are still made overseas, they have begun to start assembling some iMacs in the USA. Supposedly the Mac Pro line will move some or all production to the USA at some point too.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Apple's mobile devices are still made overseas, they have begun to start assembling some iMacs in the USA. Supposedly the Mac Pro line will move some or all production to the USA at some point too.

 

I applaud Apple and Motorola for moving assembly lines back to the US. We need more products built here in the USA. Maybe some other major devices will start being built here too.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any new iPhone is heralded as the Jesus Phone, does that make a highly anticipated Google phone the Satan Phone? Just asking...

 

:devilangel:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If any new iPhone is heralded as the Jesus Phone, does that make a highly anticipated Google phone the Satan Phone? Just asking...

 

:devilangel:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

 

I'm so tired of this crazy idea that the iPhone is the 'Jesus Phone'. First, the iPhone is a very selfish phone, hence the 'i' in its name, and Jesus was very anti-selfish! So people using said term are calling Jesus selfish. And second, if Google flops on the Xphone like Moto did on the Photon and the Photon Q, then they are just another stupid company so riddled with corporate greed that they would line their pockets at consumers expense of being dumb enough to buy a phone based on the brand. Of course, this applies to Apple, Samsung, and HTC (who have all released bad products) so ill just stop right there.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

My only worry about this phone is the supposedly under-spec of the hardware.  This is supposedly the mid-level phone in some articles?  720 screen.  S4 Pro or worst processor.  4.3-4.5 screen.

 

I don't mind the smaller screen...I kinda like it.  But, Android ain't the most efficient OS around...it needs lots of horsepower to make things run smoothly!  No matter the amount of smoothing done by Motorola, the upcoming features (4.2.2 notoriously run bad on low spec phones) of future software updates will kill this low-end processor!  Apple OS can be smoothly run on a low spec phone...Android is not that way.  And what about high-end GPU-intensive games (like Modern Combat or Real Racing)?  These games will make this X phone into a butt joke!

 

I hope that I am wrong...because I always like Motorola for their cell signal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My only worry about this phone is the supposedly under-spec of the hardware.  This is supposedly the mid-level phone in some articles?  720 screen.  S4 Pro or worst processor.  4.3-4.5 screen.

 

I don't mind the smaller screen...I kinda like it.  But, Android ain't the most efficient OS around...it needs lots of horsepower to make things run smoothly!  No matter the amount of smoothing done by Motorola, the upcoming features (4.2.2 notoriously run bad on low spec phones) of future software updates will kill this low-end processor!  Apple OS can be smoothly run on a low spec phone...Android is not that way.  And what about high-end GPU-intensive games (like Modern Combat or Real Racing)?  These games will make this X phone into a butt joke!

 

I hope that I am wrong...because I always like Motorola for their cell signal.

 

 

It will be a standard qualcomm quad core S4 Pro - what the clockspeed is (likely 1.7GHz, like the HTC One) doesn't really matter.

 

The display quality is more important to me vs. resolution.  Granted the HTC One has the quality and resolution that really sets the bar... so 720p is pretty outdated at this point.

 

I think how the phone performs overall will really be the deciding factor here.  Not just specs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link: http://androidandme.com/2013/07/opinions/4-reasons-why-the-moto-x-will-live-up-to-the-hype/

 

 

" There are actually going to be eight different “cores” making the Moto X a contextually aware information powerhouse. 

They break down like this:

  • Four processors cores are dedicated to graphics. By taking this route, you’re going to see Android running smoother than ever before. Paired with stock Android, this thing is going to fly in the graphics department.
  • Two processors cores are dedicated to applications. Let the graphics processors focus on graphics, while two 1.7 GHz processors focus on apps.
  • One processor will be dedicated to language processing. The low-power language chip will focus on audio sensors, noise cancellation and speech recognition. This will allow the Moto X to use an always-on listening mode, but still retain sufficient battery life.
  • One processor will be dedicated to other contextual sensors. During his interview at All Things D11, Dennis Woodside said the Moto X would “anticipate” what you want to do with your phone. Hold it up like you’re going to take a picture, your camera will turn on. That’s what this processor is for."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't understand this.  It is Qualcomm S4 PRO processor...what is the deal with 8 cores??  It sounds like a Samsung Exynos 5 Octa copy or something.  Anyone with more knowledge comment on this???

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So, in summary, here are the options I tested: T-Mobile intl roaming - LTE on SoftBank, routes back to the US (~220ms to 4.2.2.4) IIJ physical SIM - LTE on NTT, local routing Airalo - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer SoftBank), routed through Singapore (SingTel) Ubigi - 5G on NTT, routed through Singapore (Transatel) US Mobile East Asia roaming - 5G on SoftBank, routed through Singapore (Club SIM) Saily - 5G on NTT, routed through Hong Kong (Truphone)...seems to be poorer routing my1010 - LTE on SoftBank and KDDI (seems to prefer KDDI), routed through Taiwan (Chunghwa Telecom) I wouldn't buy up on the T-Mobile international roaming, but it's a solid fallback. If you have the US Mobile roaming eSIM that's a great option. Otherwise Ubigi, Airalo, or my1010 are all solid options, so get whatever's cheapest. I wouldn't bother trying to find a physical SIM from IIJ...the Japanese IP is nice but there's enough WiFi that you can get a Japanese IP enough for whatever you need, and eSIM flexibility is great (IIJ as eSIM but seems a bit more involved to get it to work).
    • So, the rural part of the journey still has cell service for nearly all the way, usually on B18/19/8 (depending on whether we're talking about KDDI/NTT/SoftBank). I think I saw a bit of B28 and even n28 early on in the trip, though that faded out after a bit. Once we got to where we were going though, KDDI had enough B41 to pull 150+ Mbps, while NTT and SoftBank had B1/B3 IIRC. Cell service was likewise generally fine from Kawaguchiko Station to Tokyo on the express bus to Shinjuku Station, though there were some cases where only low-band LTE was available and capacity seemed to struggle. I also figured out what I was seeing with SoftBank on 40 MHz vs. 100 MHz n77: the 40 MHz blocks are actually inside the n78 band class, but SoftBank advertises them as n77, probably to facilitate NR CA. My phone likely preferred the 40 MHz slices as they're *much* lower-frequency, ~3.4 GHz rather than ~3.9, though of course I did see the 100 MHz slice being used rather often. By contrast, when I got NR on NTT it was either n28 10x10 or, more often, 100 MHz n78. As usual, EMEA bands on my S24 don't CA, so any data speeds I saw were the result of either one LTE carrier or one LTE carrier plus one NR carrier...except for B41 LTE. KDDI seems to have more B41 bandwidth live at this point, so my1010 or Airalo works well for this, and honestly while SoftBank and NTT 5G (in descending order of availability) have 5G that's readily available it may be diminishing returns, particularly given that I still don't know how to, as someone not from Hong Kong, get an eSIM that runs on SoftBank 5G that isn't the USM "comes for free with the unlimited premium package" roaming eSIM (NTT is easy enough thanks to Ubigi). In other news, I was able to borrow someone's Rakuten eSIM and...got LTE with it. 40 Mbps down, 20 Mbps up, 40ms latency to Tokyo while in Tokyo...which isn't any worse than the Japan-based physical SIMs I had used earlier. But not getting n77 or n257 was disappointing, though I had to test the eSIM from one spot rather than bouncing around the city to find somewhere with better reception. It's currently impossible to get a SIM as a foreigner that runs on Rakuten, so that was the best I could do. Also, I know my phone doesn't have all the LTE and 5G bands needed to take full advantage of Japanese networks. My S24 is missing: B21 (1500 MHz) - NTT B11 (1500 MHz) - KDDI, SoftBank B42 (3500 MHz) - NTT, KDDI, SoftBank n79 (4900 MHz) - NTT Of the above, B42/n79 are available on the latest iPhones, though you lose n257, and I'm guessing you're not going to find B11/B21 on a phone sold outside Japan.
    • T-Mobile acquiring SoniqWave's 2.5 GHz spectrum  Another spectrum speculator down! T-Mobile is acquiring all of their BRS/EBS licenses and their leases. Details are lacking but it looks like T-Mobile might be giving them 3.45GHz in exchange in some of the markets where they're acquiring BRS/EBS to sweeten the deal and stay below the spectrum screen. Hopefully NextWave is at the negotiating table with T-Mobile so NYC can finally get access to the full BRS/EBS band as well.  — — — — — Edit: Turns out this is a spectrum swap where T-Mobile is basically giving them DoD spectrum in a bunch of markets in exchange for all of SoniqWave's BRS/EBS. SoniqWave will likely turn around and sell the DoD spectrum to AT&T whenever the FCC removes the 40MHz cap.
    • Maybe. The taller buildings on one side of the street all have Fios access and the NYCHA buildings are surrounded by Verizon macros that have mmWave. I don’t think this site will add much coverage. It’d be better off inside the complex itself.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...