Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Michigan Market (Detroit/Flint/Ann Arbor/Tri-Cities)


ReyBanz

Recommended Posts

In the places you frequent, how are indoor speeds?

Even if you're on b25 indoors, are you noticing speeds increasing due to b41 adoption?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I haven't been able to test Band 25 indoors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway with spark very close to launch in Detroit, you soon won't have to make excuses for sprint anymore [emoji12]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm not making excuses for Sprint, 3-5Mbps is solid enough to do tasks on a smartphone or use as a hotspot, etc.  Some people in rural United States would rejoice to get those speeds with a wireline connection.  Meanwhile some complain they are not getting epenis speeds...

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not making excuses for Sprint, 3-5Mbps is solid enough to do tasks on a smartphone or use as a hotspot, etc.  Some people in rural United States would rejoice to get those speeds with a wireline connection.  Meanwhile some complain they are not getting epenis speeds...

Where are you getting those speeds? Wherever I am I'm getting .5 at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just got an M9 and around Livonia and downriver those are the speeds I'm getting.

Hmm. I would think you'd see at least ONE multi megabit speed test by now since many other people in this thread have reported them all over.

 

If you can $5, you can become a sponsor and have access to precise sprint tower locations to have a better chance of finding 2.5

 

According to premier sponsor schedule maps for Detroit -AA, sprint should be very close to their 6-month upgrade timeline for 2.5 ghz

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint store

Telegraph and 12 mile

Galaxy S5

B25

3c72099ce1e7b02da95a85402e839e1f.jpg

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's how Lansing was until B41 was launched. Made all the difference in the world

 

Sent from SPH-L720T running CM12

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's how Lansing was until B41 was launched. Made all the difference in the world

 

Sent from SPH-L720T running CM12

I know. Only reason I posted it is because we're really close according to b41 schedule and I thought things would be better by now.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's how Lansing was until B41 was launched. Made all the difference in the world

 

Sent from SPH-L720T running CM12

 

You waste your time, energy and electrons replying to the resident T-Mob agitant. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You waste your time, energy and electrons replying to the resident T-Mob agitant.

I think I adequately replied k?

http://www.s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2262-Network-Vision-LTE---East-Michigan-Market-%28Detroit-Flint-Ann-Arbor-Tri-Cities%29/page__view__findpost__p__414698

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how you guys deal with Sprint up there. Every time I've been to Michigan anywhere near Detroit, Canton, Oak Park, Romulus, etc... LTE doesn't work worth a damn. I have to switch to 3G to get working service. Ann Arbor is nice though, Cleveland is still a lot better in terms of LTE speed and usability. For all I know it might be an issue with my phone being provisioned in another market. Can I get any conformation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how you guys deal with Sprint up there. Every time I've been to Michigan anywhere near Detroit, Canton, Oak Park, Romulus, etc... LTE doesn't work worth a damn. I have to switch to 3G to get working service. Ann Arbor is nice though, Cleveland is still a lot better in terms of LTE speed and usability. For all I know it might be an issue with my phone being provisioned in another market. Can I get any conformation?

PRL update always helps. It's what I had to do in Florida to get LTE reliability. But yes, LTE really isn't that reliable in the Detroit market, especially Detroit. At my house I'm on 3G most of the time. It was excellent in Florida.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PRL update always helps. It's what I had to do in Florida to get LTE reliability. But yes, LTE really isn't that reliable in the Detroit market, especially Detroit. At my house I'm on 3G most of the time. It was excellent in Florida.

 

Any improvement in "LTE reliability" that you see after a PRL update is likely by coincidence. It does not change your service or what market your device is provisioned for. You probably saw an improvement because your mobile connection was reset after the PRL update and it forced a rescan of some sort that put you on a better connection. You can simulate the exact same thing by turning on airplane mode, waiting a few seconds, and then turning it back off.

 

-Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PRL update always helps. It's what I had to do in Florida to get LTE reliability. But yes, LTE really isn't that reliable in the Detroit market, especially Detroit. At my house I'm on 3G most of the time. It was excellent in Florida.

Chances are that in Florida you had B26. With B26, you will have better propagation and in-building penetration as it is a lower frequency. No band 26 in east michigan in the near future i think.....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PRL update always helps. It's what I had to do in Florida to get LTE reliability. But yes, LTE really isn't that reliable in the Detroit market, especially Detroit. At my house I'm on 3G most of the time. It was excellent in Florida.

 

Yeah,  I did that to get better LTE service but it was still shoddy at most. I switched to 3G only and it worked perfectly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I went back to Oak Park on Wednesday I ended up getting better speeds. Around 5mbit/s which is more than fine. I didn't have to switch back to 3G just to use data this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • In the conference call they had two question on additional spectrum. One was the 800 spectrum. They are not certain what will happen, thus have not really put it into their plans either way (sale or no sale). The do have a reserve level. It is seen as great for new technologies which I presume is IOT or 5g slices.  They did not bite on use of their c-band or DOD.  mmWave rapidly approaching deadlines not mentioned at all. FWA brushes on this as it deals with underutilized spectrum on a sector by sector basis.  They are willing to take more money to allow FWA to be mobile (think RV or camping). Unsure if this represents a higher priority, for example, RVs in Walmart parking lots where mobile needs all the capacity. In terms of FWA capacity, their offload strategy is fiber through joint ventures where T-Mobile does the marketing, sales, and customer support while the fiber company does the network planning and installation.  50%-50% financial split not being consolidated into their books. I think discussion of other spectrum would have diluted the fiber joint venture discussion. They do have a fund which one use is to purchase new spectrum. Sale of the 800Mhz would go into this. It should be noted that they continue to buy 2.5Ghz spectrum from schools etc to replace leases. They will have a conference this fall  to update their overall strategies. Other notes from the call are 75% of the phones on the network are 5g. About 85% of their sites have n41, n25, and n71. 93% of traffic is on midband.  SA is also adding to their performance advantage, which they figure is still ahead of other carriers by two years. It took two weeks to put the auction 108 spectrum to use at their existing sites. Mention was also made that their site spacing was designed for midrange thus no gaps in n41 coverage, while competitors was designed for lowband thus toggles back and forth for n77.  
    • The manual network selection sounds like it isn't always scanning NR, hence Dish not showing up. Your easiest way to force Dish is going to be forcing the phone into NR-only mode (*#*#4636#*#* menu?), since rainbow sims don't support SA on T-Mobile.
    • "The company’s unique multi-layer approach to 5G, with dedicated standalone 5G deployed nationwide across 600MHz, 1.9GHz, and 2.5GHz delivers customers a consistently strong experience, with 85% of 5G traffic on sites with all three spectrum bands deployed." Meanwhile they are very close to a construction deadline in June for 850Mhz of mmWave in most of Ohio iirc. No reported sightings.
    • T-Mobile Delivers Industry-Leading Customer, Service Revenue and Profitability Growth in Q1 2024, and Raises 2024 Guidance https://www.t-mobile.com/news/business/t-mobile-q1-2024-earnings — — — — — I find it funny that when they talk about their spectrum layers they're saying n71, n25, and n41. They're completely avoiding talking about mmWave.
    • Was true in my market. Likely means a higher percentage of 5g phones in your market.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...