Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - East Michigan Market (Detroit/Flint/Ann Arbor/Tri-Cities)


ReyBanz

Recommended Posts

I know... To my point, exactly! Are contractors required to notify the municipality first? Perhaps there are some public records available online?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I know that after Nextel was taken down, Verizon moved in and they had permit drawings for anyone to see on the premises. Clarify, this was Sylvania,OH

 

mobile with Evo LTE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty confident to say that the tower right next to the Southfield freeway just north of West Chicago has been upgraded to NV. I drive past it almost everyday. I drove past it today and it sure looks a lot more cluttered up there; i.e. more cabling and I believe RRU's I definitely saw some new longer panels up there.

 

I'm going to try and get some pictures tomorrow morning; the site is right on the service drive so I should be able to get some great pictures.

 

P.S. - I didn't see a LTE connection on my phone, but I was doing 70 when I drove past it so..... I'm going to try toggling airplane mode a few times while I'm taking pictures tomorrow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty confident to say that the tower right next to the Southfield freeway just north of West Chicago has been upgraded to NV. I drive past it almost everyday. I drove past it today and it sure looks a lot more cluttered up there; i.e. more cabling and I believe RRU's I definitely saw some new longer panels up there. I'm going to try and get some pictures tomorrow morning; the site is right on the service drive so I should be able to get some great pictures. P.S. - I didn't see a LTE connection on my phone, but I was doing 70 when I drove past it so..... I'm going to try toggling airplane mode a few times while I'm taking pictures tomorrow

 

Sprint, at least here in FL, typically has two panels up then add an additional panel to the mix with RRUs mounted on the back of that one panel. Other carriers, like the AT&T sites I have seen, have an RRU on the back of each panel. Here is an example of the back of the one panel additional installed on each side http://bit.ly/WelfLi It's been easy from a distance to make out a tower that has had NV upgrades made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am pretty confident to say that the tower right next to the Southfield freeway just north of West Chicago has been upgraded to NV. I drive past it almost everyday. I drove past it today and it sure looks a lot more cluttered up there; i.e. more cabling and I believe RRU's I definitely saw some new longer panels up there.

 

I'm going to try and get some pictures tomorrow morning; the site is right on the service drive so I should be able to get some great pictures.

 

P.S. - I didn't see a LTE connection on my phone, but I was doing 70 when I drove past it so..... I'm going to try toggling airplane mode a few times while I'm taking pictures tomorrow

 

OK false alarm; I went back to the tower over the weekend and there's nothing new on the Sprint tier of the tower. I'll keep an eye on it though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too am waiting for the east Michigan market. I just wanted to say that this weekend while parking somewhere in the metro Detroit area I saw a Samsung wireless coverage truck (and that was how it was labeled). Shockingly he parked right next to me. Was running late so I didn't have time to ask about it. Does anyone know if this is a definite sign of lte work done in my area?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too am waiting for the east Michigan market. I just wanted to say that this weekend while parking somewhere in the metro Detroit area I saw a Samsung wireless coverage truck (and that was how it was labeled). Shockingly he parked right next to me. Was running late so I didn't have time to ask about it. Does anyone know if this is a definite sign of lte work done in my area?

 

Definite sign? No. But encouraging. :tu:

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grrrrr....not encouraging:

 

http://bit.ly/WoNYxa

 

No Michigan cities or towns even on this list, but much smaller areas are on it. I'm trying to figure out what Detroit/lower southeast Michigan ever did to Sprint to deserve the cold shoulder.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to remind you two that you are violating the S4GRU posting rules regarding unwanted negativity on the forums.

 

The update is stating new cities that are going to be worked on relatively soon and all markets are to begin in 2013 no matter what. Feel free to donate and become a sponsor if you want to know more info about the roll outs but if you won't then don't complain here.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/1197-s4gru-posting-guidelines-aka-the-rulez/

 

Negative comments. Negative comments about Sprint and/or S4GRU are allowed. However, negative comments must be constructive in nature, relevant to the topic and the conversation, illustrate facts, be made rationally and intelligently and cannot have an attack tone. Rants will not be allowed. We do not host Sprint's complaints. Complaints about Sprint should be directed to their customer service channels.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking the same thing... Why set up 4g in every little dinky town in the nation, but none where people actually are? Why doesn't sprint listen to people? I understand that the problem with Detroit is how big of a market it is, but it isn't unreasonable. Sprints probably getting around us by saying we have some (as in a ridiculously small amount) WiMAX, now shut up and be happy.

 

They are updating markets as soon as they are ready, they are not going by population size, number of subscribers, or anything like they. They are taking the route that gets the job done the fastest. It just so happens that some people get to be first, and someone has to be last. Like with anything else in life.

 

Today I started a google search by typing "sprint 4g" and before I had even finished typing google already suggested that I was going to type "sprint 4g lte Detroit". How many people have to search that for it to be automatically assumed by google?

 

Google knows where you are. If I type in "Sprint 4G", I get "Sprint 4G Kansas City."

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone comes here and wonders where their pointless, whiny posts went, I deleted them. Rants and unhelpful negative comments are prohibited, and should be directed to official Sprint channels. S4GRU.com does not host Sprint's complaints. If you are unable to abide by this rule, you can notify the staff that you would like your account deleted and we will even give you suggestions on where to find another forum for your posts.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Google knows where you are. If I type in "Sprint 4G", I get "Sprint 4G Kansas City."

 

Mistake on my part. Now that you mention it that seems to make a lot more sense.

 

Sorry about the rant; I was very disappointed upon not seeing this area on sprints latest release of cities. This forum is so helpful to me the last thing I'd like is to be kicked off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I misread it or that some people didn't bother reading it thoroughly at all but wasn't it posted on the wall that this list of cities was in addition to markets already being rolled out? Point being that just because no Michigan cities were on the new list doesn't mean LTE isn't coming soon. My take is that information was posted thus answering questions before some eventually asked anyway. Then again I could be very wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My office location changed. Right outside my windows about 600 yards away is a tower. My signal meter is pegged so it is probably Sprint. Can anyone confirm?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

They cannot, I'm afraid. In the Sponsor section are maps showing all Sprint sites in the country. But it would be a violation for our members to disclose anything in the Sponsor section. But if you become a S4GRU Sponsor, you can get access to that data and much more.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps my interest wasn't accurately communicated. I was really just wondering if the antenna tower appears as if it was upgraded for LTE or not. I know some have mentioned there are ways of identifying updated towers. I'll see this every weekday for a long time, just wondering if I should be looking for someone climbing the tower with some hardware in tow?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps my interest wasn't accurately communicated. I was really just wondering if the antenna tower appears as if it was upgraded for LTE or not. I know some have mentioned there are ways of identifying updated towers. I'll see this every weekday for a long time, just wondering if I should be looking for someone climbing the tower with some hardware in tow?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

By the picture alone, it is hard to identify. It is quite blurry. If you are able to post a better picture, we may be able to identify for you.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

By the picture alone, it is hard to identify. It is quite blurry. If you are able to post a better picture, we may be able to identify for you.

 

Robert

 

Will do. It will be a while, I'm not back in the office until after the new year. :-)

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the picture alone, it is hard to identify. It is quite blurry. If you are able to post a better picture, we may be able to identify for you.

 

Robert

 

Robert, have any good info on the East Michigan deployments, such as metro Detroit. Sprint put out a tweet to someone yesterday. Here is what it said

 

"@thetictacaddict Currently LTE is not scheduled for Detroit, for up to date information please visit --> http://t.co/LwyO2iaj -EAC"

 

The above tweet was sent by @sprintcare

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Historically, T-Mobile has been the only carrier contracting with Crown Castle Solutions, at least in Brooklyn. I did a quick count of the ~35 nodes currently marked as "installed" and everything mapped appears to be T-Mobile. However, they have a macro sector pointed directly at this site and seem to continue relying on the older-style DAS nodes. Additionally, there's another Crown Castle Solutions node approved for construction just around the corner, well within range of their macro. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Verizon using a new vendor for their mmWave build, especially since the macro site directly behind this node lacks mmWave/CBRS deployment (limited to LTE plus C-Band). However, opting for a multi-carrier solution here seems unlikely unless another carrier has actually joined the build. This node is equidistant (about five blocks) between two AT&T macro sites, and there are no oDAS nodes deployed nearby. Although I'm not currently mapping AT&T, based on CellMapper, it appears to be right on cell edge for both sites. Regardless, it appears that whoever is deploying is planning for a significant build. There are eight Crown Castle Solutions nodes approved for construction in a 12-block by 2-block area.
    • Starlink (1900mhz) for T-Mobile, AST SpaceMobile (700mhz and 850mhz) for AT&T, GlobalStar (unknown frequency) for Apple, Iridium (unknown frequency) for Samsung, and AST SpaceMobile (850mhz) for Verizon only work on frequency bands the carrier has licensed nationwide.  These systems broadcast and listen on multiple frequencies at the same time in areas much wider than normal cellular market license areas.  They would struggle with only broadcasting certain frequencies only in certain markets so instead they require a nationwide license.  With the antennas that are included on the satellites, they have range of cellular band frequencies they support and can have different frequencies with different providers in each supported country.  The cellular bands in use are typically 5mhz x 5mhz bands (37.5mbps total for the entire cell) or smaller so they do not have a lot of data bandwidth for the satellite band covering a very large plot of land with potentially millions of customers in a single large cellular satellite cell.  I have heard that each of Starlink's cells sharing that bandwidth will cover 75 or more miles. Satellite cellular connectivity will be set to the lowest priority connection just before SOS service on supported mobile devices and is made available nationwide in supported countries.  The mobile device rules pushed by the provider decide when and where the device is allowed to connect to the satellite service and what services can be provided over that connection.  The satellite has a weak receiving antenna and is moving very quickly so any significant obstructions above your mobile device antenna could cause it not to work.  All the cellular satellite services are starting with texting only and some of them like Apple's solution only support a predefined set of text messages.  Eventually it is expected that a limited number of simultaneous voice calls (VoLTE) will run on these per satellite cell.  Any spare data will then be available as an extremely slow LTE data connection as it could potentially be shared by millions of people.  Satellite data from the way these are currently configured will likely never work well enough to use unless you are in a very remote location.
    • T-Mobile owns the PCS G-block across the contiguous U.S. so they can just use that spectrum to broadcast direct to cell. Ideally your phone would only connect to it in areas where there isn't any terrestrial service available.
    • So how does this whole direct to satellite thing fit in with the way it works now? Carriers spend billions for licenses for specific areas. So now T-Mobile can offer service direct to customers without having a Terrestrial license first?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...