Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Albuquerque market (including El Paso, Las Cruces, Santa Fe, Los Alamos, Roswell)

S4GRU

By S4GRU
in Markets

 Share

Recommended Posts

FLEABttn Member Level: Smoke Signals

FLEABttn

Posted
Posted

So for all of you who work right near me... I just got a ping of 168 and download speeds of 1.74 mbps at work. This is by far the fastest speeds I've gotten here at work on 3g.

 

Sorry guy, can't test this anymore.  I very recently found out after my last post that my GFs work is a total deadzone so not seeing a point in paying for a line that doesn't work 8-10 hours a day, I jumped to T-Mobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

S4GRU
S4GRU

They are starting the ABQ market with the site next to my house. I just ran into subcontractors for Ericsson who are starting to upgrade my site in El Valle de Arroyo Seco, New Mexico. Unbelievable!!!

S4GRU
S4GRU

OK. I've now uploaded pics. I talked with the guys there. They are electricians hired by SBA. SBA is subcontracted to Ericsson. They are here to install the RRU's only today. My site here did no

techcj_manzer
techcj_manzer

Also, here's a quick speed test while I stopped to pick my dinner up @ Uptown     Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted Images

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sorry guy, can't test this anymore. I very recently found out after my last post that my GFs work is a total deadzone so not seeing a point in paying for a line that doesn't work 8-10 hours a day, I jumped to T-Mobile.

Tmo is fantastic in ABQ and Santa Fe...in the city limits. It's all 2G EDGE everywhere else. :td:

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy Note II using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Strife Member Level: iDEN *chirp*

Strife

Posted
Posted

The TorC site hasn't been accepted yet. So they may have it hooked up to legacy backhaul while checking if the equipment is operational and forgot to take it down.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

So what is the deal with the accepted site in cruces losing LTE?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So what is the deal with the accepted site in cruces losing LTE?

Happens all the time in unlaunched markets.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
khammondnm Member Level: eHRPD

khammondnm

Posted
Posted

But isn't Sprint basically 2G everywhere in NM?

absolutely not. Sprint has quite a bit of 3g and with NV almost every site, rural or not, will have 3g and 4g, even if it only has 2g right now.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
  • Author
Posted

But isn't Sprint basically 2G everywhere in NM?

Every Sprint site in New Mexico has 3G EVDO/EHRPD. And the ones outside the city where Tmo only has 2G work great. Typically 1-2.5Mbps.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites
khammondnm Member Level: eHRPD

khammondnm

Posted
Posted

I've only been getting mostly sub 1 Mbps on Sprint in the city...

Just ran a test here at work and got .21 mbps down and .05 up...

That is because you are on a legacy tower that likely had insufficient backhaul in place. Once we start seeing lte turned on you will also see over 1mbps 3g speeds all over town pretty consistently.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCUJuan Member Level: 3G EVDO

TheCUJuan

Posted
Posted

That is because you are on a legacy tower that likely had insufficient backhaul in place. Once we start seeing lte turned on you will also see over 1mbps 3g speeds all over town pretty consistently.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 4

:clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCUJuan Member Level: 3G EVDO

TheCUJuan

Posted
Posted

Speaking of which... I was driving by Jefferson/Paseo today after lunch and once again must have been on that updated GMO 3G tower by balloon fiesta and got speeds of about 1.5 Mbps... can't wait to see that at least those speeds citywide! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jroepcke51 Member Level: 4G WiMax

jroepcke51

Posted
Posted

Speaking of which... I was driving by Jefferson/Paseo today after lunch and once again must have been on that updated GMO 3G tower by balloon fiesta and got speeds of about 1.5 Mbps... can't wait to see that at least those speeds citywide!

Welcome to being a Premier Sponsor. I suggest you spend a bunch of time in the Sponsor and Premier section. So much information to get caught up on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
khammondnm Member Level: eHRPD

khammondnm

Posted
Posted

Im starting to decide if i should stay with Sprint, or switch to T-Mobile

like it has been said on here before, T-Mobile is good in the New Mexico metro areas but unusable (data wise) outside of them. Sprint is hitting a few speed bumps, but once tri band lte is deployed it will be amazing! And plus you can now buy a tri band phone, so in essence, you can future proof yourself.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
khammondnm Member Level: eHRPD

khammondnm

Posted
Posted

I'm starting to think that inspectors who accept sites have left our state and are not returning until ABQ proper catches up with backhaul so they can justify their presence beyond a few sites.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jroepcke51 Member Level: 4G WiMax

jroepcke51

Posted
Posted

Has anyone been to the west side to see if any of their towers have begun work? I think last I looked, I only saw one tower in progress west of the river.

I have a route I am going to do on Sunday to my parents house. I will pick up most along 528 and rio rancho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jroepcke51 Member Level: 4G WiMax

jroepcke51

Posted
Posted

I'm starting to think that inspectors who accept sites have left our state and are not returning until ABQ proper catches up with backhaul so they can justify their presence beyond a few sites.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

I seem to want to agree with you. However, most of the sites i have been too in abq have no sign of backhaul at all.  This was all within the last three or four weeks that I have been visiting. I do hope this changes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCUJuan Member Level: 3G EVDO

TheCUJuan

Posted
Posted

I seem to want to agree with you. However, most of the sites i have been too in abq have no sign of backhaul at all.  This was all within the last three or four weeks that I have been visiting. I do hope this changes. 

I would hope that Sprint gets all the towers ready to go before the winter and then centurylink can bring backhaul to all the sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seventy_x_7 Member Level: Digital

seventy_x_7

Posted
Posted (edited)

I would hope that Sprint gets all the towers ready to go before the winter and then centurylink can bring backhaul to all the sites.

Me too. I can only tell customers "in the coming months" for so long. 

Edited by seventy_x_7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shmoe723 Member Level: iDEN *chirp*

shmoe723

Posted
Posted

I'd love to know exactly what the backhaul install process truly entails.  Is it just them plugging a few things in?  Is it running all sorts of fiber down miles and miles of underground duct work?  What exactly is taking so long?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SeanK_ Member Level: 4G WiMax

SeanK_

Posted
Posted

Has anyone been to the west side to see if any of their towers have begun work? I think last I looked, I only saw one tower in progress west of the river.

I live on the westside, but I don't ever seen any trucks around from my point of view.

 

Another wave of acceptances and not one acceptance in the ABQ Market. hmmm... I am starting to get scared the ABQ will be the last possible place for LTE.

:td:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • dkyeager
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Uploaded data without issues on Friday. Now with the latest update I am getting "Cluster #1 skipped: invalid file format detected. File exported for inspection." Doing same with all other clusters. Did this on 4 phones in a row.  Seems to work on s24 ultra just fine. On s21 ultra it says "web data upload failed. No data to send" although 8800 records were displayed. Now gives same error as above. I have not sent the data from 3 other phones.  All should have latest update.
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck - Android app to monitor your Wi-Fi/2G/3G/4G LTE/5G-NR signal strengths

      By mikejeep · Posted

      After several months of testing, an update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out on Google Play. It may take up to 48 hours to become available for download. Notable changes include: Added option to display site notes for NSA 5G-NR cells. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show NSA 5G-NR Site Notes) will cause the app to make an "educated guess" as to what the most appropriate site note is linked to the connected NSA 5G cell, using the PCI and the device location. If it finds an existing entry that is likely to be relevant, it will display the note along with the distance from where the strongest signal from that cell was logged. While connected to NSA 5G, these notes cannot be edited; a valid NCI is required to add/edit notes and that information is not available on NSA connections.   Added option to log cells with missing/invalid PLMN (such as NSA 5G-NR cells). Users asked for the ability to log data for NSA 5G, so a new option (Preferences > Logger Settings > Log Cells with Missing PLMN) will permit this.   Added option to display LTE info above 5G-NR info. Enabling this new option (Preferences > Display Settings > Show LTE Cells Above 5G-NR Cells) shows the same information that is currently displayed, but moves the LTE information above the 5G-NR information. Other changes: Code optimizations and enhancements. Improved Android 15 compatibility. Overhauled Purchases module. Resolved force closes impacting some GSM/LTE connections. Resolved issue with improper 5G-NR PLMN display when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with improper PLMN display with single-digit MNCs. Resolved issue with incorrect 5G-NR bands displayed on some devices due to Android bug. Resolved issue with incorrect number of neighbor cells displayed when some cells were unknown. Resolved issue with missing 5G-NR data when sector display is enabled. Resolved issue with saving 5G-NR site notes when NR/LTE PLMNs did not match. Resolved issue with settings to log missing GCI/NCI/TAC/PLMN being ignored. Resolved issues with web data export function. Updated internal libraries. Updated provider database. Updated target API to Android 15. I appreciate all of your support, and a big thank you to the members of the Beta Crew that help with testing and feedback!
    • clbowens
      Galaxy S23

      By clbowens · Posted

      Oct security update is out.
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Stopped by again today and the antennas are up but it isn't live just yet. If other Sprint conversions are anything to go by it'll likely take about a month for the site to go live.
    • mikejeep
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By mikejeep · Posted

      It is an Android bug that was reportedly fixed in August 2023 but definitely has not been. I have implemented numerous workarounds in SCP to correct the NR bands the app displays. The OS ignores the possibility that many NR-ARFCNs are valid across multiple bands.. it reports the lowest NR band that is valid for the current ARFCN. In your example, channel 432530 can be n1, n65, or n66.. so the OS just (lazily) reports n1.   Awesome, thanks! I will add an n65 override also.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...